Latest market news

Viewpoint: Asia base oil fundamentals to stay tight

  • Market: Oil products
  • 22/12/20

Asia-Pacific base oil prices are set to hold firm at least for the first few months of 2021 because of unexpectedly tight supply and strong demand.

Asia-Pacific base oil prices already rebounded by the end of 2020 to their highest levels since 2018. Prices slumped in the first half of the year when Covid-19-related lockdown measures slashed demand in the second quarter. Prices then surged in the second half of the year, when supply-demand fundamentals flipped to increasing tightness.

Prices began 2020 at firm levels. Producers ended 2019 and began the new year with supplies that were more balanced than usual. The lack of any need to clear surplus supplies in late 2019 had helped to support firm prices at that time. This price support extended into the beginning of 2020.

Supply starts 2020 more balanced

Producers' availability was more balanced at the start of the year following extended run cuts in response to persistent oversupply in 2019. The oversupply had left margins unusually weak. The diversion of feedstock and base oil supplies to other fuel markets such as the marine fuel pool added to the relative balance. A narrow price spread between base oils and the other fuels made the diversion feasible. The more balanced supplies then gave producers more leverage with the sale of their remaining volumes.

Producers used that leverage of more limited supply to maintain steady prices even as crude oil values fell throughout the first two months of 2020. Base oil demand also held firm during that period even as the lockdown in China slashed economic activity in the country in February especially. But steep run cuts by Chinese base oil producers cushioned the impact of that decline in activity.

The firmer supply-demand fundamentals helped to support prices well into March, even after crude prices slumped at the start of that month. The combination of steady base oil prices and lower crude and diesel prices triggered a sharp rebound in base oil margins.

Widespread lockdowns slash demand

But lockdowns were then implemented in a growing number of countries throughout the region to curb the Covid-19 outbreak. The moves triggered a sudden and widespread slump in base oil demand. The lockdown in India especially forced regional base oil producers to target other outlets in place of one of the region's largest importers.

A pick-up in Chinese demand in March also began to falter as buyers held back to cut their exposure to the risk of lower prices.

The slowdown in demand put more pressure on Group II producers especially because of the large volumes of supplies that usually move to base oil import giants India and China. Group I producers faced less pressure from oversupply because of run cuts in southeast Asia and Japan, and still-steady demand in China.

Producers slash prices

Group II producers responded to the lack of buying interest by slashing their prices. These fell by early April to an unusual discount to Group I base oils. This discount widened to more than $50/t by early May for Group II light grades.

But the lower prices made more arbitrage opportunities to markets like the Mideast Gulf and east Mediterranean feasible in April, and then to southeast Asia in May.

Group II heavy-grade prices also fell below Group I base oils. But they faced less pressure than Group II light-grade prices amid a steady rise in Chinese demand for heavy-grade base oils.

China soaks up surplus

The lower prices also coincided with steadier domestic prices in China. The widening spread between falling fob Asia cargo prices and steady Chinese prices made the arbitrage increasingly attractive, providing an ideal outlet for South Korean producers to clear their surplus cargoes. With their supplies more balanced, producers were then able to target firmer prices.

The stronger heavy-grade fundamentals also supported a steady rise in the heavy-grade premium to fob Asia Group II light-grade prices. The heavy-light premium rose to more than $80/t by the end of June, up from $20/t in March.

Group II prices began their steep downward correction from the first half of March. Group I base oil prices followed several weeks later, led initially by a slump in bright stock prices.

Prices for Group I light and heavy neutrals then fell as southeast Asian producers offered sizeable volumes at increasingly lower prices to clear a large overhang. Surplus supply had risen because of steady output levels in markets like Thailand in March and April, while the country's lube demand slumped. The surplus volumes attracted buyers from a range of markets, from China and southeast Asia to the Mideast Gulf.

Fundamentals balance out

The region's Group I and Group II producers had cleared most of their surplus supplies by the second half of May. Crude prices were also continuing their strong rebound at that time after bottoming out in the second half of April. Economic activity was reviving in a growing number of countries as lockdown measures were gradually relaxed during the final weeks of the second quarter.

The base oil market then switched from a state of surplus to increasing supply tightness as demand revived strongly in key markets throughout the region.

Supply tightens, demand rebounds

Extended run cuts throughout the region added to the supply tightness. The planned shutdown of several Group II plants in Asia-Pacific in the third quarter curbed those producers' supplies as they built stocks ahead of the maintenance work.

The firmer fundamentals, rising feedstock prices and squeezed margins prompted Group I and Group II producers to target increasingly higher prices, especially for heavy grades.

Heavy-grade premium rebounds

The supply of heavy grades became tighter because of a drop in shipments from several Mideast Gulf producers, the closure of some production capacity in South Korea in the fourth quarter of the year, and China's structural shortage of those base oils. Persistent refinery run cuts also trimmed feedstock supply. This curbed some producers' room to raise base oil production in response to the surge in margins.

The trend triggered a rebound in the heavy-grade premium to light grades throughout the second half of the year.

Buyers in other regions such as India, Europe and Latin America also faced tight supplies in their own markets. They responded by targeting the limited spot volumes that were available in Asia-Pacific. The pick-up in competition for the supplies triggered a further rise in prices for all base oil grades throughout the fourth quarter of the year.

The sustained competition for those tight supplies left fob Asia Group I bright stock prices more than $150/t higher than at the start of the year. They were also up by more than $350/t after bottoming out at close to $500/t in early May.

Fob Asia Group II heavy-grade prices ended the year more than $140/t higher than at the start of the year. They were also up by more than $350/t from their lowest level in late May.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
25/10/24

Pemex budget cuts freeze vendor orders

Pemex budget cuts freeze vendor orders

Mexico City, 25 October (Argus) — Mexico's state-owned company Pemex stopped requesting or receiving new work orders from vendors in the past three to four weeks, likely linked to the company's plan to cut its budget by about $1bn in the last quarter, three industry sources and a Pemex source. "Upper management has issued clear instructions: No new projects until 2025," one Pemex source told Argus . Vendors report that these reductions are affecting all Pemex regions, with significant impacts on major well maintenance — such as pipeline renewals, valve replacements and secondary recovery techniques — essential for safe and efficient oil production. Without these services, oil service companies may need to shut down wells, risking oil spills or even explosions. The halt in work orders took effect in late September and has primarily hit orders related to maintenance in Pemex's exploration and production (E&P) operations. According to vendors, Pemex issued an internal directive on 11 October, instructing units to implement budget reductions across all E&P activities to save an estimated $1bn. Despite these cuts, vendors claim Pemex's new administration has not formally notified them about the halt — a pattern they say has become typical over the last six years. Adding to vendors' worries is Pemex's ongoing payment backlog. As of 2 October, Pemex's upstream division (PEP) owed Ps99bn ($5bn) to suppliers, with Ps81bn related to 2024 projects, Ps10.5bn from 2023 and Ps1.9bn from 2022, according to an internal document. Pemex's overall overdue payments peaked at Ps126.4bn in July. "The current situation is extremely worrisome," one Pemex supplier told Argus . "And there is no indication thatthere will be any new payments to vendors this month." Some top vendors, including Protexa, Marinsa, Naviera Integral and Solar Turbines, are weighing partial or complete work stoppages by early November unless payment issues are resolved. Drilling company Opex recently announced a "temporary adjustment" in its services because of payment delays, two other vendors said. A year ago, Pemex vendors discussed a general halt over similar payment delays, with some major suppliers like SBL, Halliburton, Weatherford and Baker Hughes eventually securing payments and continuing work. Now, with budget cuts looming into 2025, vendors are increasingly concerned that continued cuts and payment delays will severely impact Pemex's oil production, which hit a 40-year low of 1.45mn b/d in September. By Édgar Sígler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

B24 bunker demand in Asia, Middle East to rise in 2025


25/10/24
News
25/10/24

B24 bunker demand in Asia, Middle East to rise in 2025

Singapore, 25 October (Argus) — B24 bunker demand in the key ports of Singapore, Zhoushan and Fujairah will likely rise in 2025, because of increased demand ahead of the implementation of the EU's FuelEU maritime regulation. Regional demand for B24 — which consists of 24pc used cooking oil methy ester (Ucome) and 76pc very low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) — is expected to rise as shipowners prepare to meet more stringent mandates set by the EU and the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) from next year, said market participants. FuelEU Maritime aims to raise the share of renewable and low-carbon fuels in the fuel mix of maritime transport within the EU, and will set requirements for greenhouse gas emission reductions against a 2020 baseline level, starting with 2pc in 2025. The use of B24 is a relatively low-cost way to help meet the new mandate and is available at key ports globally. Competition for B24 is rising in Asia and the Middle East as port authorities revisit local rules and permits. The Zhoushan Port Authority will obtain the domestic blend permit by the end of the year, it said recently at a local conference,which will pave the way for key local refiners to blend and sell B24 to local and international shipowners. The quota is likely to be divided among Chinese majors like PetroChina (CNPC), Sinopec, and CNOOC. The port authorities further mentioned that CNPC and Sinopec are expected to each receive a blending quota of 200,000t of B24, while CNOOC will receive a blend quota of 100,000t in 2025. There were no further details available or any other formal announcement. But regional traders and shipowners, which have been waiting for the lifting of restrictions by the Chinese government, expect the move will allow shipowners more options to bunker B24 in this region. European market participants expect this B24 blending permit, if allocated, may pull some marine biodiesel demand towards Zhoushan and away from shipowners operating on east-west routes between Singapore and Europe.B24 blends in Zhoushan could end up pricing very competitively against VLSFO when EU emission trading system (ETS) costs are accounted for, given easing prices for Chinese-origin biodiesel, participants added. And FuelEU Maritime's pooling mechanism, which allows shipowners to pool different vessels together to achieve overall compliance across the pool, will enable shipowners that operate east-west routes to pool those vessels with other vessels that operate only within the EU — opening the door for marine biodiesel bunkered in Zhoushan to help meet FuelEU compliance. Singapore B24 consumption has been on the rise in Singapore, the world's largest bunkering hub, through 2024 because of demand from regional and international shipowners for refuelling of this blended marine fuels. B24 consumption touched 470,300t between January to September, according to data from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA). Demand for B24 is expected to near 800,000t by the end of 2024, up from 518,000t in 2023. Zhoushan remains competitively priced versus Singapore for VLSFO, with Singapore's delivered on board (dob) prices for the past year showing a $3/t premium versus Zhoushan on average, based on Argus data. But Singapore-based traders remain confident that the city-state will continue to lead the region in terms of B24 bunkering demand into 2025. "I think both ports will co-exist and there will be price competition…also it doesn't replace Singapore as the main port, do note," said a key global trader and refiner. Singapore is also the cheapest in terms of B24 pricing, compared with other key ports like Rotterdam and Fujairah. The spread between Singapore versus Rotterdam since 24 April shows a $94/t discount for bunkering in the former port, while the discount for Singapore with Fujairah stood at an average of $39.4/t, based on Argus data. Middle East Bunkering B24 has been picking up in the Middle East since the end of 2023, with sporadic demand trickling in this year. "We receive enquiries for B24 once or twice a month, sometimes even less than that for small volumes of 150-200t," one Fujairah-based trader said. But this could change following the implementation of the EU's FuelEU Maritime regulation from January 2025 . The EU is an important market and a regular destination for much of the maritime traffic passing through Fujairah, so the new regulations are likely to be a trigger for change, market participants said. "Many vessels refuel in Fujairah before calling at EU ports," one trader says. "They already have to comply with the EU ETS, [Carbon Intensity Index], and will need to also comply with FuelEU." By Mahua Chakravarty, Hussein Al-Khalisy and Elshan Aliyev Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

TotalEnergies Feyzin refinery issue hits bitumen supply


23/10/24
News
23/10/24

TotalEnergies Feyzin refinery issue hits bitumen supply

London, 23 October (Argus) — Bitumen production at the 109,300 b/d Feyzin refinery near Lyon, France has been hit following an issue with its sulphur recovery unit. Bitumen production is limited while the issue is resolved, according to sources. A market participants told Argus they had seen no bitumen production or supply available from Feyzin for the past week as a result of the issue. Feyzin previously had a reformer unit out due to a fire at the refinery in late August. By Fenella Rhodes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

UK bitumen demand outlook downbeat ahead of budget


23/10/24
News
23/10/24

UK bitumen demand outlook downbeat ahead of budget

London, 23 October (Argus) — The outlook for UK road construction and bitumen demand is downbeat, with no clear prospects of a recovery from years of weakening consumption ahead of the government's budget announcement on 30 October. Construction sector buyers and refinery suppliers at the recent Highways UK conference said road and highway spending, and resulting bitumen demand, is likely to remain slow, with the government unlikely to commit larger sums as it looks to tackle a £22bn ($28.6bn) "black hole" in government finances it says was left behind by the previous administration. A European construction firm with a UK project portfolio said a number of major highway projects it had expected to begin in 2025 will probably be postponed to 2026, as a start next year would have required funding to be allocated to them well before now. A firm with extensive UK project work said its activity and volumes had dropped this year but that it was hoping for no further falls in 2025. Some of the funds due to have been switched from the UK's ambitious high-speed rail (HS2) programme into road building could end up plugging the financial gap. The previous goverment in November last year pledged £8.3bn from a massively curtailed HS2 would be spent on resurfacing more than 5,000 miles (8,000km) of roads over an 11-year period. Some market participants pointed to the government's commitment to a major housebuilding programme as something that could, if public and private funds are forthcoming, generate a significant boost to bitumen demand for associated paving and roofing work. Fixing potholes Additional demand could be generated from pothole repair work, after the most recent annual Local Authority Road Maintenance (Alarm) survey showed a further deterioration in road surfaces because of real-term cuts in local authority maintenance budgets. Transport secretary Louise Haigh pledged in October to fix a "pothole plague" as part of a government plan to repair up to 1mn more a year. An October 2021 spending review by the previous government had pledged more than £2.7bn of local highway maintenance funding over the three tax years from 2022 to 2025 to local authorities outside London and the eight largest city regions. The funds, including monies to fix potholes, have failed to arrest a decline on UK roads. Motorist body AA said that up to September this year pothole related breakdown call-outs have increased by 2pc compared with the same period of 2023. The other leading UK body representing road users, RAC, said its pothole-related breakdown numbers went up by 10pc in the 12 months to 31 March. Government data show UK bitumen consumption slipped to 1.54mn t in 2023, the lowest since 2016 . Consumption was 1.89mn t in 2021 and 1.56mn t in 2022. In the first seven months of this year consumption was 835,000t, 9pc down from 917,000t in the same period of 2023. By Fenella Rhodes and Keyvan Hedvat Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Biomethanol, fuel oil demand up in Rotterdam port 3Q


23/10/24
News
23/10/24

Biomethanol, fuel oil demand up in Rotterdam port 3Q

London, 23 October (Argus) — Bunker fuel oil and biomethanol sales at the port of Rotterdam rose in the third quarter of this year, but those of gasoil and marine biodiesel fell, according to official port data. Very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO), ultra-low sulphur fuel oil (ULSFO), and high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) sales all picked up on the quarter and on the year ( see table ). Participants attributed the increase in HSFO demand to the seasonal arrival of containerships at the port. HSFO demand rose in the previous quarter owing to re-routing of vessels because of chronic traffic disruption in the Red Sea. Ahead of the Mediterranean Sea becoming an emission control area (ECA) in May 2025, participants had pointed to expectations of firmer ULSFO demand in Europe for scrubber-less vessels operating between ECA zones. Vessels operating in ECA zones are be required to burn marine fuels with a sulphur content no higher than 0.1pc, rather than the global cap of 0.5pc. Combined sales for marine gasoil (MGO) and marine diesel oil (MDO) fell on the quarter and on the year in July-September. Market participants reported mostly lacklustre bunker fuel demand in the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) hub in that time, combined with tight prompt availability that weighed further on sales. Marine biodiesel blend sales declined sharply owing to a shift in voluntary demand east of Suez. B24 dob Singapore, a blend comprising VLSFO and used cooking oil methyl ester (Ucome), was an average of $715.56/t in July–September. This is lower than comparable assessed European blends, such as B30 Ucome dob ARA that averaged $804.71/t, B30 advanced fatty acid methyl ester (Fame) 0 dob ARA — which includes a deduction of the value of Dutch HBE-G renewable fuel tickets — at $738.12/t, and B24 Ucome dob Algeciras-Gibraltar at $784.12/t. Consequently containerships seeking to deliver proof of sustainability (PoS) documentation to their customers, to offset the latter's scope 3 emissions, shifted their marine biodiesel demand to Singapore when feasible. PoS can be obtained on a mass-balance system, allowing shipowners flexibility with regards to the port at which a blend can be bunkered. Biomethanol sales at the port of Rotterdam more than doubled on the quarter and soared by more than eight times on the year. Several shipping companies are leaning towards methanol and renewable methanol as alternative marine fuels to reduce their emissions. Danish shipping giant Maersk has ordered 24 methanol-powered container ships for delivery and commissioning during 2024-25, and Japanese classification society ClassNK said recently it expects 77 methanol-ready ships to be ordered by 2026, up from 27 newbuilds expected to be ordered this year. ESL Shipping said earlier this month it will build four new vessels that can run on biomethanol and green hydrogen-based e-methanol. Offtake agreements for renewable methanol are on the rise. Maersk has signed several letters of intent for procurement of biomethanol and e-methanol from producers such as Norway's state-controlled Equinor , Proman and OCI Global . Maersk has agreed to buy 500,000 t/yr from Danish shipping and logistics company Goldwind from 2024. Singaporean container shipping group X-Press Feeders said in 2023 it will buy biomethanol from OCI's Texas plant starting this year. By Hussein Al-Khalisy, Natália Coelho, and Evelina Lungu Rotterdam bunker sales t Fuel 3Q24 2Q24 3Q23 q-o-q% y-o-y% VLSFO & ULSFO 1,045,774 917,253 997,356 14.0 4.9 HSFO 906,737 825,125 790,195 9.9 14.7 MGO & MDO 334,752 369,267 379,142 -9.3 -11.7 Marine biodiesel blends 137,177 235,043 183,249 -41.6 -25.1 Total 2,424,440 2,346,688 2,349,942 3.3 3.2 LNG (m³) 220,120 242,931 204,418 -9.4 7.7 Biomethanol 2,066 950 250 117.5 726.4 Port of Rotterdam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more