Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Viewpoint: Asia fails to ramp up Paris pledges in 2020

  • Market: Emissions
  • 25/01/21

Joe Biden took executive action to rejoin the global Paris climate agreement in one of his first moves as US president, signalling a term of renewed climate leadership from the world's second-largest greenhouse gas emitter.

A co-ordinated ramp-up in action is needed if the agreement's goal of limiting global temperatures' increase to between 1.5-2°C is to be met. Without additional policies, warming is set to surpass 3°C by the end of the century despite a 7pc emissions dip because of the Covid-19 pandemic this year, according to the UNEP's 2020 emissions gap report. But Asia-Pacific nations unanimously failed to strengthen emissions reduction targets by 2020, the agreement's first rolling five-year deadline.

Major emitters India and China neglected to update climate pledges by the end of 2020, while Japan, South Korea, Singapore, New Zealand, Vietnam and Australia did submit new targets on time but did not increase ambitions, according to climate policy analyst Carbon Brief.

Signatories to the 2015 Paris agreement approved a "ratchet mechanism" that requires they each update emissions targets and policies or nationally determined contributions (NDCs) every five years to steadily raise ambition over time, after governments formally acknowledged their collective commitments from 2015 would not meet the agreement's goal.

China

China, the world's largest emitter, has yet to formally register its new NDC with the UN despite accelerating climate commitments in recent months. Beijing pledged the country would reach peak emissions before 2030 and be carbon neutral by 2060 in September, shortly followed by a long-awaited nationwide emissions trading scheme that starts from February.

But China's unofficial revised 2030 target mentioned at December's UN climate action summit sets it up for overachievement, with ambiguous language contrasting with its bold, clear-cut decarbonisation pledge. At December's summit President Xi Jinping said China aims to cut GDP emissions intensity by "more than" 65pc by 2030 from 2005 levels, up from 60-65pc in its previous NDC. Ambition appears weak given the country has already slashed emissions intensity by over 50pc from the 2005 baseline and at a rate of 20-22pc during recent five-year periods. To achieve the new target, intensity will need to drop by 16pc for each five-year period over the next decade.

But the addition of "more than" is far from negligible and leaves room to scale up efforts. While a 65pc intensity reduction will still allow absolute emissions to rise by around 15pc over the next decade, a 69pc drop will halt emissions growth. China's ministry of ecology and environment is still engrossed in hashing out its climate change strategy and should clarify its plan to 2030 and beyond after the country's parliamentary 2021 two sessions in early March.

Japan, South Korea

Japan and South Korea were among 10 major emitters — contributing over 1pc of global greenhouse gases annually — that met the 2020 deadline, although both resubmitted NDCs unchanged from 2016.

Japan aims to lower emissions by 26pc below 2013 levels by 2030, while South Korea by the same year plans to bring emissions 37pc below business-as-usual (BAU) levels. Independent climate policy tracker Climate Action Tracker (CAT) rates these targets as "highly insufficient", meaning if all governments took a similar approach, warming will reach between 3-4°C by 2100. But both nations have said they will update NDCs in 2021. Ambition in these new targets will be seen as a litmus test of their commitment to decarbonise after they announced plans to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 late last year.

Australia

Australia also left its NDC flat from 2016 and deliberately downplayed rather than ramped up ambitions. Its new submission states the country is "on track to meet and beat [its] 2030 target" of reducing emissions by 26-28pc below a 2005 baseline.

But critics point out this target warranted revisiting in 2020 as it is not yet in line with the Paris agreement goals. The government has also faced criticism for making the target weaker in absolute emissions terms by adjusting historical emissions data between 2016 and 2020 submissions. It set the 2005 baseline at 598mn t of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) in 2016 but later hiked this up to 611mn t CO2e on changed assumptions about land use emissions.

Unlike large northeast Asian economies, Australia has stressed that it will not revisit its target again before 2025.

Singapore

Singapore altered its 2030 NDC to an absolute emissions cap of 65mn t CO2e from its prior GDP intensity cut target of 36pc from 2005 levels. Absolute emissions targets guarantee reductions regardless of economic growth, but in this case ambitions remain similar despite the change in metric. Singapore is set to overachieve without any policy changes, with 2030 emissions already on course to peak up to 24pc below target at 48.3mn-49.7mn t CO2e in 2030.

New Zealand

New Zealand put forward an unchanged NDC rated as "insufficient" by CAT, though further edits are likely following advice from the country's independent climate change commission due in early 2021. The government has sought to position itself as a global leader in climate policy by enshrining its net-zero emissions by 2050 target into law in the 2019 Zero Carbon Act, although the exemption of methane that makes up 40pc of total emissions weakens this commitment.

Vietnam

Vietnam submitted a slightly improved NDC in 2020 but is still set to vastly outperform its new target, which uses an inaccurate emissions baseline inflated far above its real BAU trajectory. Annual emissions are heading for 448mn-496mn t CO2e by 2030, 40-50pc beneath its NDC target in absolute emissions terms but still consistent with 2-3°C warming.

But the country's revised environmental protection law passed in November 2020 may pave the way for stronger climate policy and deeper emissions cuts. Under the law, which takes effect from 1 January 2022, the government seeks to become the first developing nation to establish carbon pricing, although details have not yet been specified.

India

Though India has not indicated it will update its initial NDC, it is one of the few nations assessed by CAT with a 2030 target in line with 1.5-2°C warming as targeted by the Paris agreement. It is also on track to overperform, as emissions intensity should drop to 37-39pc below 2005 levels by 2030, largely spurred by strong investments in solar and wind power.

But India must plan for a full phase-out of coal by 2040 to remain Paris-compliant beyond the next decade. The agreement requires that signatories peak emissions in the first half of the century and reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

Asia-Pacific emissions, NDCs(mn t CO2e)
Latest historical GHG emissions excl forestryGlobal emissions share %Projected 2030 emissions current post-Covid policy2016 initial NDC to 20302020 updated NDC to 2030Latest NDC in absolute emissions by 2030Latest NDC warming equivalent<2C compatible absolute emissions by 2030
Japan1,238 (2018)2.6905-1,03626% emissions cut below 2013 Unchanged; updates expected 20211,079.03-4°C<327
South Korea714 (2017)1.3665-74337% emissions cut below BAU Unchanged; updates expected 20215393-4°C<316
Australia557 (2017)1.1487-50626-28% emissions cut below 2005 Unchanged445-4673-4°C<386
New Zealand79.6 (2017)0.165-72.130% emissions cut below 2005 Unchanged67.52-3°C<58
Singapore49.3 (2014)0.148.3-49.736% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005Peak emissions at 65mn t CO2e 653-4°C<5.9
Vietnam325 (2014)0.6448-4968% emissions cut below BAU; 25% with international assistance9% emissions cut below BAU; 27% with international assistance903; 748 with assistance>4°C<375
China13,442 (2018)24.312,922-14,66660-65% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005>65% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005 * not official13,744-15,1943-4°C<10,715
India2,993 (2018)6.93,837-4,06633-35% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005No update expected5,350-5,6821.5-2°C<6,463
Malaysia158 (2016) 0.6Unassessed35% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005; 45% with international assistance No update expectedUnassessedUnassessedUnassessed
Indonesia856 (2016)4.71,073-1,32629% emissions cut below BAU; 41% with international assistanceNo update expected1,8173-4°C<1,127

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
01/04/25

US oil, farm groups push EPA for steep biofuel mandate

US oil, farm groups push EPA for steep biofuel mandate

New York, 1 April (Argus) — The American Petroleum Institute and biofuel-supporting groups told Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials at a meeting today that the agency should sharply raise advanced biofuel blend mandates for 2026. The coalition told EPA that it supported a biomass-based diesel mandate next year of 5.25bn USG, up from 3.35bn USG this year, and a broader advanced biofuel mandate, including the cellulosic category, at 10bn Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits, up from 7.33bn RINs this year, according to three different groups that attended the meeting. Both mandates would be record highs for the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program. Soybean oil futures and RIN credit prices have risen sharply over the past week on optimism that oil and biofuel interests were working to coordinate volume mandate requests for consideration by President Donald Trump's administration. The coalition is also pushing the agency to set a total conventional volume requirement at 25bn RINs, which would keep an implied mandate for corn ethanol flat at 15bn USG. Ethanol groups had previously eyed a mandate even higher, but limits on the amount of ethanol that can be blended into gasoline make much more-stringent requirements a tough sell to oil refiners. The coalition provided no specific request for the cellulosic biofuel subcategory, where most credit generation comes from biogas. Credits in that category are more expensive, but price concerns have been less potent recently given an EPA proposal to lower previously set cellulosic obligations, signaling that future volume requirements can be cut, too. EPA is aiming to finalize new RFS volume mandates by the end of the year if not earlier, people familiar with the administration's thinking have said. EPA officials signaled at the meeting they were working urgently on the rulemaking. "The agency is intent on getting the RFS program back on the statutory timeline for issuing renewable volume obligation rules," EPA said, declining to comment further on its plans for the rule. The RFS program requires oil refiners and importers to blend biofuels into the conventional fuel supply or buy credits from those who do. Under the program's unique nesting structure, credits from blending lower-carbon biofuels can be used to meet obligations for other program categories. One gallon of corn ethanol generates 1 RIN, but more energy-dense fuels earn more RIN credits per gallon. Some disagreements persist While groups at the meeting were aligned around high-level mandates, how administration officials and courts treat small refinery requests for exemptions from RFS requirements could undercut those targets. Groups present were broadly aligned on asking EPA not to grant widespread exemptions, though there is still disagreement in the industry about how best to account for exempted volumes when deciding requirements for other refiners. Groups present at the meeting today included the American Petroleum Institute and representatives of biofuel producers and crop feedstock suppliers. Some groups that previously engaged with the coalition's efforts to project unity to the Trump administration were not present. And some groups more historically skeptical of the RFS and more supportive of small refinery exemptions — including the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers — have not been closely involved. Fuel marketer groups notably did not attend the meeting after a representative sparred with others in the coalition at an American Petroleum Institute meeting last month. Some retail groups, including the National Association of Convenience Stores and the National Association of Truck Stop Operators, instead sent a letter to EPA today arguing that the groups pushing steep volumes are discounting potential headwinds to the sector from new tax credit policy. Some of the groups advocating for higher biofuel volumes have pointed to high production capacity and feedstock availability, but have preferred to ignore thornier issues like tax credits, lobbyists say. "An overly aggressive increase in advanced biofuel blending mandates under the RFS will be punitive for American consumers" without extending a long-running $1/USG tax credit for biomass-based diesel blenders, the retailers' letter said. That incentive expired last year and was replaced by the Inflation Reduction Act's "45Z" credit, which offers subsidies to producers instead of blenders and throttles benefits based on carbon intensity. Generally lower credit values for biomass-based diesel — coupled with the US government's delays setting final regulations on qualifying for the credit — have spurred a sharp drop in biofuel production to start the year. Without a blenders credit, the RFS volume mandates pushed by some groups could increase retail diesel prices by 30¢/USG, the fuel marketers estimate, a potential political headache for a president that ran on curbing consumer costs. Other biofuel groups say that extending the credit would be an uphill battle this year, with some lawmakers and lobbyists instead focused on legislatively tweaking the 45Z incentive's rules to benefit crop feedstocks instead of reverting wholesale to the prior tax policy. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Singapore, Peru sign Article 6 carbon deal


01/04/25
News
01/04/25

Singapore, Peru sign Article 6 carbon deal

London, 1 April (Argus) — Singapore and Peru have signed an agreement to trade carbon credits under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. The deal will provide the foundation for Singapore to hit its climate targets by buying carbon credits from Peru, while channelling finance to the latter for scaling its climate projects. Carbon credits traded under Article 6 are called Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (Itmos). They count towards the buyer's nationally determined contribution and must meet several criteria, such as featuring a letter of authorisation from the host country. Market sources have suggested that "logistical barriers" have complicated the issuance of letters of authorisation, heavily limiting the pool of credits that can be traded as Itmos. Towards the end of last month, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change issued a template for letters of authorisation establishing precisely what information a host country must receive from project developers in order to authorise their credits for trade credits under Article 6. The deal is Singapore's first with a Latin American country, which host some of the largest nature-based projects in the world in reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation and afforestation, reforestation and revegetation project areas. Singapore has signed similar Article 6 agreements with Papua New Guinea, Ghana and Bhutan. By Felix Todd Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU publishes CO2 car standard tweak proposal


01/04/25
News
01/04/25

EU publishes CO2 car standard tweak proposal

Brussels, 1 April (Argus) — The European Commission has published the long-awaited proposal to give automobile manufacturers more flexibility in complying with the bloc's CO2 reduction targets for cars and passenger vehicles in 2025, 2026 and 2027. Those three years would be assessed jointly, rather than annually, averaging out fleet emission performance. EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said the additional compliance flexibility shows that the commission has "listened" but the EU is still maintaining its zero-emission targets [for new vehicles from 2035]. "Predictability in the sector is crucial for long-term investments," said Hoekstra. The commission urged the European Parliament and EU member states to reach agreement on the targeted amendment "without delay". German centre-right member Jens Gieseke said there is a "broad majority" in parliament to fast-track approval for May. He noted that the car industry faces over €15bn ($16bn) in penalties for non-compliance with the CO2 standards. A member of parliament's largest EPP group, Gieseke also called for the commission to go further towards technological neutrality. "We need different kinds of fuels, e-fuels, biofuels, every fuel which could help to reduce CO2 should be recognized," he added. This second step, withdrawing the phase-out of internal combustion engines (ICE) from 2035 onwards, Gieseke noted, should come in the last quarter of 2025. German Green MEP Michael Bloss disputed the figure of €15bn in potential fines put forward by automotive industry association ACEA. "Even in the worst-case scenario, the total fines for all car manufacturers would not exceed €1bn," said Bloss. "Car manufacturers have had enough time to adjust their production planning. Many have done so," Bloss said, pointing to Automaker Volvo. Under the current 2019 regulation, fines should be imposed on manufacturers for each year in 2025–2029 when they do not reach their specific fleet-wide target CO2 reductions, compared to 2021 values. But manufacturers have the option to form compliance pools with other firms. "European car manufacturers are already talking to Tesla or Chinese manufacturers about so-called pooling, which must be stopped quickly," said EPP climate and environment spokesman Peter Liese. "We want to maintain climate targets, but not make Elon Musk richer through European legislation," said Liese. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU commission's CO2 tweak for cars imminent: Update


31/03/25
News
31/03/25

EU commission's CO2 tweak for cars imminent: Update

Updates with likely date for approval Brussels, 31 March (Argus) — The European commission could approve a legal proposal for a limited revision of the bloc's 2019 regulation setting CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and light commercial vehicles (LCVs) on 1 April, an official said. A draft proposal circulating does not change the substance of the 2019 rules but specifies a three-year compliance period (2025-2027) used to calculate potential excess emissions premiums. And the 29-page legal proposal does not alter the bloc's 2030 emissions reduction target to reduce economy-wide CO2 emissions by 55pc, compared to 1990. Nor does it lower the overall CO2 emission standards, the commission said. If agreed by the European Parliament and EU member states, the "one-off" three-year compliance period over 2025-2027, instead of an annual assessment, would provide additional flexibility for vehicles manufacturers, while maintaining investor certainty and predictability, the commission added. The 2019 regulation requires annual EU fleet-wide average CO2 emissions from new cars and new vans to be reduced in five-year intervals. For each year in 2025–2029, a target reduction of 15pc, compared with 2021 values, would normally be applied. Without any legal change approved by parliament and EU states, manufacturers exceeding their specific emissions targets, would have to pay excess emission premiums of €95 per g/km for each new vehicle registered. The commission is also "accelerating" work on a review that will commence "in good time this year", said the commission's energy and climate spokesperson Anna-Kaisa Itkonen. But she had "nothing new" on whether compliant fuels could be expanded beyond e-fuels to include other low-carbon and zero-carbon, such as biofuels. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU commission expects CO2 tweak for cars soon


31/03/25
News
31/03/25

EU commission expects CO2 tweak for cars soon

Brussels, 31 March (Argus) — The European commission expects to "very soon" release a legal proposal for a limited revision of the bloc's 2019 regulation setting CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and light commercial vehicles (LCVs). A draft proposal circulating does not change the substance of the 2019 rules but specifies a three-year compliance period (2025-2027) used to calculate potential excess emissions premiums. And the 29-page legal proposal does not alter the bloc's 2030 emissions reduction target to reduce economy-wide CO2 emissions by 55pc, compared to 1990. Nor does it lower the overall CO2 emission standards, the commission said. If agreed by the European Parliament and EU member states, the "one-off" three-year compliance period over 2025-2027, instead of an annual assessment, would provide additional flexibility for vehicles manufacturers, while maintaining investor certainty and predictability, the commission added. The 2019 regulation requires annual EU fleet-wide average CO2 emissions from new cars and new vans to be reduced in five-year intervals. For each year in 2025–2029, a target reduction of 15pc, compared with 2021 values, would normally be applied. Without any legal change approved by parliament and EU states, manufacturers exceeding their specific emissions targets, would have to pay excess emission premiums of €95 per g/km for each new vehicle registered. The commission is also "accelerating" work on a review that will commence "in good time this year", said the commission's energy and climate spokesperson Anna-Kaisa Itkonen. But she had "nothing new" on whether compliant fuels could be expanded beyond e-fuels to include other low-carbon and zero-carbon, such as biofuels. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more