Petrobras ramps up gas imports amid drought

Market: Electricity, Natural gas
14/05/21

Brazil's oil and gas regulator (ANP) today authorized higher imports of natural gas to generate more gas-fired electricity as drought saps hydropower output.

ANP authorized state-controlled Petrobras to import 31mn m³ a year of LNG while thermal power generation company Ambar Energia was authorized to import 2.3mn m³/d of natural gas from Bolivia.

Petrobras got the green light to import LNG from any country through January 2023, to be delivered at the Rio de Janeiro state port of Baía de Guanabara, the Ceara state port of Pecem, and the Bahia state port of Baia de Todos os Santos, where the state-controlled company has regasification facilities.

The authorizations are among measures the Brazilian government has announced since April to try to boost thermal power generation as the largely hydropower-dependant country faces its worst drought in its 91-years of record keeping.

The imports of LNG authorized for Petrobras are the equivalent of 51mn m³/d of natural gas, about 40pc of the country's daily natural gas output.

The Ministry of Mines and Energy also ordered that all maintenance on thermal power facilities be cancelled to avoid restrictions on power generation. The Electric Sector Operator (ONS) lists in its daily report around 4,000MW of natural gas and LNG thermal power capacity that is currently unavailable because of maintenance, restrictions in operations for unreported reasons, retrofitting or suspended commercialization.

The ministry also promised to move forward the dispatch of natural gas to thermal power plants. In December, the entity estimated that 4,010MW of thermal power capacity, comprised of mainly gas, was expected to start operation by 2021 and 2022. Brazil's natural gas production in April averaged 123.9mn m³/d, while imports from its main supplier Bolivia in February averaged 20.2 mn m³/day.

President Jair Bolsonaro's office has created a special group formed by ministries and regulatory entities focused on water and energy use planning. The first meeting of the group occurred yesterday, with discussions to avoid rationing water and electricity this year. An action plan will be presented within 15 days, aiming to help maintain water levels at the main reservoirs.

Planned maintenance at Petrobras' pre-salt Mexilhao field and its Rota 1 pipeline, expected in August, would reduce the gas supply for thermal power plants, which prompted the government to discuss measures that can be adopted to avoid shortages to gas power plants. The Rota 1 pipeline has a gas transport capacity of 10mn m3/d. Measures regarding the pipeline and Mexilhao were not disclosed by the ministry.

The ministry said a recently enacted new gas law will help the country cope with hydropower generation restrictions, and help stimulate more gas supply for the country. "There will be more actors that will compete to meet eventual gas demand from the thermoelectric segment," the ministry said in an email.

By Flávia Pierry

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

05/11/24

Voting set to conclude in race for White House

Washington, 5 November (Argus) — Voting concludes today in the US presidential contest between former president Donald Trump and vice president Kamala Harris, a race with high stakes for energy policy, trade and climate change. Polls will close by 6-9pm ET in eastern states and by 11 pm ET in most western states, but election officials say it will take time to count votes, including from mail-in ballots that will trickle in over the coming days. As of 3 November, voters who went to the polling stations early or sent mail-in ballots added up to 48pc of the total turnout in 2020, according to analysis by the Washington Post. The presidential race is likely to be determined by voters in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada, where pre-election polls have shown no decisive lead for Harris or Trump. Voters are casting ballots at a time when domestic oil and gas production is booming. US crude output reached a record high 13mn b/d last year, while gas production hit a record 103 Bcf/d, according to the US Energy Information Administration. Despite record production and profits in the oil industry, Trump has focused heavily on energy policy — and voter anger over higher prices across the economy — in his bid to win a second term. US drivers paid an average of $3.07/USG for regular grade gasoline in the week ended on 4 November, the lowest price in 10 months — but still higher than at any point during Trump's first presidency. On the campaign trail, Trump has assured oil and gas producers that under his watch they would be permitted to "drill, baby, drill" and has promised to dismantle the energy tax credits in President Joe Biden's signature climate initiative, the Inflation Reduction Act. Harris has committed to support the 2022 law and other energy policies adopted by Biden, including continued support for electric vehicles. Harris has disavowed her 2019 pledge to ban hydraulic fracturing. But oil and gas firms remain concerned about restrictions on federal leasing and efforts to electrify the vehicle fleet if she is elected. The next president will decide key questions on energy policy, such as how to proceed with a "pause" on the licensing of new US LNG export facilities and to manage climate-related rules for power plants, oil and gas facilities and vehicles. The race for the White House will have equally high stakes for companies involved in metals and agriculture , as well as other commodities. Trump is planning a combative approach to trade, with a 20pc tariff on all foreign imports and even higher tariffs against China, and to rescind many regulations. In 2025, the US Congress is poised for a major fight on tax policy because of the year-end expiration of an estimated $4 trillion in tax cuts. Russia's war on Ukraine, and the future of US restrictions on Russian energy exports is also at stake during the election. Trump has vowed to end the war by forcing Kyiv to negotiate a deal with Russian president Vladimir Putin and appears to back the Kremlin's argument that the continuation of US sanctions on Russia would weaken and undermine the dollar. A Harris administration would continue enforcing the G7 price cap on Russian oil exports and, possibly, add to the restrictions on Moscow's earnings from its oil and gas exports. The growing threat of an Israel-Iran war and its potential impacts on oil flows from the Middle East is threatening to overwhelm the final months of Biden's term in office and any foreign policy initiatives either candidate vying to succeed him will pursue in the region. US-China relations are likely to remain adversarial in coming years. Viewing Beijing as the principal economic and geopolitical challenge for the US is a rare overlap in foreign policy priorities identified by Trump and Harris. Of particular concern in Washington is the ability of oil exporting countries such as Iran, Venezuela and Russia to find willing buyers for their crude in China despite US sanctions. Polls also show a tight race in the fight for control of the US House of Representatives, where Republicans hold a slim 220-212 majority. Up to 22 congressional races are up to grabs, with a range of potential outcomes favoring either party, election ratings firm Cook Political Report says. Cook rates 208 seats as solid or leaning Republican, and 205 solid or leaning Democratic, with both shy of the 218 needed for control of the chamber. In the US Senate, where Democrats hold a 51-49 majority, Republicans have a clear path to taking control because of polling leads in West Virginia and Montana. Republicans could win control of the Senate by flipping just one seat, if Trump wins the election, but would need to flip two seats if Harris wins. By Chris Knight and Haik Gugarats Presidential race still a toss-up Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Latin America mulls nuclear power revival

05/11/24

News

05/11/24

Latin America mulls nuclear power revival

New York, 5 November (Argus) — Nuclear power is gaining traction in Latin America as countries see small modular reactors (SMRs) as options for remote regions that are not connected to power grids. "The advent of SMRs are behind Latin America's new interest in nuclear energy, because they do not need to be large and do not require large investments," said Modesto Montoya, a nuclear physicist and former president of the Peruvian Institute for Nuclear Energy. Nuclear power is not a prevalent source of electricity in Latin America, producing around 2pc of the region's power consumption. There are seven nuclear power plants with a total capacity of 5.07GW in operation in the region, located in Argentina, Mexico and Brazil. Argentina has a 32MW SMR plant under construction. But the role of nuclear could increase in the region. Argentina, Brazil and Mexico are providing technical advice to countries that are considering including the technology in their power systems. Earlier this month, El Salvador approved a nuclear energy law and signed a memorandum with the Argentinian government for scientific and technology cooperation for nuclear power. Daniel Alvarez, director of the Agency for Implementation of the Nuclear Energy Program in El Salvador, told Argus that the country was "following the book to develop nuclear power. We want to convert El Salvador into a nuclear country." The country needs to replace fossil fuels as half of the country's power capacity is fueled by bunker fuel. It has 204MW of geothermal capacity installed and, while solar energy is possible, the country's size limits the amount of physical space to add large solar plants. The government's plan is to have a research reactor and 400 people trained to manage a nuclear plant within seven years. The next step would be the construction of SMR. "We have to include alternatives for power generation and SMRs are a very good option. We want to include them in our transition to 2050,"Alvarez said. SMRs are also seen as a solution to the energy problem in the northern jungle city of Iquitos, in Peru, energy and mines minister Romulo Mucho said. It is one of the world's largest cities that is not accessible by road and not connected to the national grid, relying primarily on fuel oil for power generation. Peru has had experience with nuclear technology since 1988, when it opened the nuclear research facility, RASCO. Neighboring Bolivia has been working on a small nuclear program since the previous decade with Russia's Rosatom. It has a center for nuclear medicine and is finishing a small research reactor. Ronald Veizaga, deputy minister of electricity and renewable energies, said Bolivia began the program to improve medical treatment for cancer, but has changed gears. "Critics claim SMRs are expensive, but it is more expensive to have blackouts affecting your population and industry," he said. Traditional nuclear Paraguay is considering a more ambitious path, looking at a traditional nuclear plant. "We need to make political decisions if we want to explore a SMR or a large-scale plant to generate 1GW or more," said Jorge Molina, executive secretary of Paraguay's Radiology and Nuclear Authority. Paraguay could work with Argentina and Brazil to create a regional platform. "Our idea is part of regional integration. Our neighbors are already helping us develop our regulations," he said. But the construction of nuclear plants comes with challenges including high costs, time, labor and materials. Brazil began work on the 1.4GW Angra 3 nuclear plant in 1984 but works have been halted and resumed several times since then. The plant is roughly 67pc complete and has been in limbo since 2015. The country's Bndes development bank recently concluded that abandoning the construction of the project would be less costly than completing it. By Lucien Chauvin Countries with installed nuclear capacity in Latin America GW Country Capacity Argentina 1.64 Brazil 1.88 Mexico 1.55 — Ons, Cammesa, Cenace Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Japan’s 53MW Chokai Minami biomass plant comes on line

05/11/24

News

05/11/24

Japan’s 53MW Chokai Minami biomass plant comes on line

Tokyo, 5 November (Argus) — A joint venture led by Japanese utility Tohoku Electric Power has started commercial operations at the 53MW Chokai Minami biomass-fired power plant in Japan's Yamagata prefecture. Operations started on 2 November. The plant burns a combined 200,000 t/yr of imported wood pellets and palm kernel shells (PKS) to generate around 330 GWh/yr of electricity, which will be sold under the country's feed in tariff (FiT) scheme, the joint-venture company announced on 5 November. The plant is operated by Chokai Minami Biomass Power, which is 75pc owned by Tohoku Electric Power, 15pc by renewable energy developer Olympia and 10pc by a subsidiary of Japanese gas supplier Shizuoka Gas. Chokai Minami is Tohoku's first biomass-only combustion project. The company has also invested in the 50MW Niigata Higashikou biomass plant, which is planning to start operations in mid-November, later than October as initially scheduled. Tohoku has two other planned biomass projects, the 2MW Yokote and the 2MW Yuzawa plants. These facilities are scheduled to come on line in June 2026 and October 2026 respectively. By Takeshi Maeda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump unlikely to fully end US clean energy policies

04/11/24

News

04/11/24

Trump unlikely to fully end US clean energy policies

Houston, 4 November (Argus) — Although former US president Donald Trump has promised to end climate policies enacted during the administration of President Joe Biden, the political complications of reversing course make a full change of direction unlikely should Trump return to the White House. Trump has frequently criticized Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), promising to terminate the " Green New Scam " and rescind all unspent funds in the Biden administration's climate policy suite, if he is elected to a second term. But fulfilling that pledge may be difficult for many reasons, not least of which is whether Republicans have control of both chambers of Congress after Tuesday's election, including the unlikely outcome of a 60-seat majority needed to bypass a Senate filibuster. Beyond the math, Republican districts are benefiting from IRA funding, with some lawmakers from Trump's party already opposing the turmoil that could arise from an about-face on tax policy. "There's no way they're going to be able to replace and repeal the IRA, in large part because so many of the dollars are flowing to [Republican] states," said David Shepheard, a partner at consultant Baringa who specializes in energy and resources. "I think the pieces of the IRA that are most at risk are the [electric vehicle] tax credits, potentially some of the stimulative pieces around offshore wind." The IRA established a host of federal incentives to support clean electricity growth and the associated domestic supply chain. Those include technology-agnostic production and investment tax credits for electricity generators based on their emissions intensities. But the law went well beyond the power sector and also established credits for hydrogen production, electric vehicles and the manufacture of components needed by clean electricity systems. Project developers are counting on a policy trajectory that does not match Trump's rhetoric, which would allow some incentives to stay on the books. Companies expect market forces, such as corporate demand, and state mandates to continue to drive growth for solar and onshore wind and energy storage, rather than national politics. But there is more trepidation around offshore wind, a less mature sector for which the federal government is effectively the landlord for project sites. "There is no doubt that the trajectory of the US offshore wind industry will be impacted by the November election," Liz Burdock, chief executive of offshore wind industry group Oceantic Network, said. "Its outcome will influence how we maintain our momentum." Uncertainty around the US presidential election has dampened private investment in the sector this year, according to Oceantic. At the same time, companies say the industry has come a long way since 2016, with a handful of projects now operating, while recent macroeconomic challenges are subsiding. Furthermore, demand for offshore wind would continue at the state level, and these factors could make the industry more resilient to headwinds. Executive decisions Trump still could use the executive branch to "stonewall" sectors helped by the IRA in the absence of a repeal, including by influence the timing or distribution of IRA funds, according to Shepheard. He could shift regulators' priorities to new oil and gas development, which, along with other actions, could make resources such as combined-cycle natural gas plants more attractive than renewables. "The extent that renewables and other cleaner energy assets are competing with gas, that'll be the big change from a Trump administration," Shepheard said. At the same time, funding for onshore wind and solar is "relatively safe", and tax credits for hydrogen and carbon capture are on comparably firm ground because of support from the oil and gas industry, Shepheard said. Some companies have expressed cautious optimism that some elements of the IRA, such as the advanced manufacturing tax credit, will survive. The incentive is not only important for the solar supply chain but also offshore wind, as state-level solicitations often require developers to invest in local manufacturing. Republican states in the US southeast have already benefited from new factories springing up on the back of the credits. For example, Enel chose Oklahoma for a new new module plant , First Solar located a factory in Alabama and Qcells has expanded production in Georgia. Moreover, removing that carrot could leave the US solar industry reliant on Chinese companies, which could run afoul of Trump's protectionist trade instincts. Trump's campaign did not respond to multiple requests to elaborate on his policy plans. By Patrick Zemanek Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Oil services upturn takes a pause for breath

04/11/24

News

04/11/24

Oil services upturn takes a pause for breath

New York, 4 November (Argus) — The boom in demand for oil field services is showing signs of wavering in the short term as international customers signal greater caution around spending and the outlook for US shale remains challenged. Upstream spending growth in the North American onshore market is expected to be flat in 2025, with low natural gas prices, drilling efficiencies and further consolidation among producers in the shale patch all exerting downward pressure. Given a mixed international outlook, one bright spot will be offshore markets, and deepwater in particular, according to investment management firm Evercore ISI. "The solid growth years of 2023 and 2024 are over as the cycle resets," senior managing director James West says. "We view 2025 as an aberration in a long-term, albeit slower, growth cycle." In the near term, the sector's attention will be focused on spending plans by top producers including state-run Saudi Aramco and Brazil's Petrobras, as well as any signs of a potential recovery in Chinese oil demand given the government's latest stimulus efforts to kick-start growth. The sector has had to contend with more than $200bn of shale mergers and acquisitions over the past year, which has shrunk the pool of available customers, and led to oil field services providers beginning their own round of consolidation. Moreover, with capital discipline remaining the rallying cry, significant productivity gains have enabled producers to do more with less. Its immediate challenges were put into stark contrast this week by oil's renewed plunge, this time on the back of Israel's decision to spare Iran's energy infrastructure from retaliatory strikes. SLB, the biggest oil field services contractor, has attributed recent price volatility to concerns over an oversupplied market owing to higher output from non-Opec producers, as well as questions over when the cartel will return barrels to the market and weak economic growth. That spurred some customers to adopt a "cautionary approach" when it came to activity and spending in the third quarter. Gas to the rescue But SLB remains upbeat over the long-term outlook, given the current emphasis on energy security, a key role for natural gas in the energy transition, and expectations that oil will remain a "large part" of the energy mix for decades to come. Gas investment remains robust in international markets, particularly in Asia, the Middle East and the North Sea. "While short-cycle oil investments have been more challenged, long-cycle deepwater projects globally and most capacity expansion projects in the Middle East remain economically and strategically favourable," SLB chief executive Olivier Le Peuch says. Exploration successes in frontier regions from Namibia to Suriname are also unlocking vast reserves that only serve to bolster confidence in the offshore market. Global offshore investment decisions will approach $100bn this year and in the next 2-3 years, adding up to more than $500bn for 2023-26, according to Le Peuch, representing a "growth engine for the industry going forward". Meanwhile, Baker Hughes expects to capitalise on a growing market for gas infrastructure equipment. The company forecasts natural gas demand will grow by almost 20pc by 2040, with global LNG demand increasing at a faster rate of 75pc. "This is the age of gas," chief executive Lorenzo Simonelli says. The top services firms see limited short-term growth prospects for North America, with the exception of the Gulf of Mexico. Hydraulic fracturing services provider Liberty Energy plans a temporary reduction in its fleet in response to slower customer activity and market pressures. And SLB says any potential pick-up in gas rigs could be offset by a further decline in oil rigs owing to efficiencies. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more