Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

EU green fuels talks slowed by detail

  • Market: Biofuels, Natural gas, Oil products
  • 29/11/21

EU energy ministers will meet this week to try and clear stumbling blocks — notably over targeted levels — in legislation aimed at boosting uptake of renewable fuels, including sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) and maritime fuels with a lower greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity.

Member states had aimed for a common position on the proposals before the end of this year, which would have allowed ministers to press the European Parliament to open talks for a final legal text. But energy ministers are now only expected, on 2 December, to take note of their differences.

Chairing discussions, Slovenia would like ministers to give political "guidance" to member state experts on the "ambition" for SAFs, maritime fuel GHG reductions and, more generally, targets for renewable fuels.

For maritime fuels, member states "largely agree" with the objectives but call for "more time" to examine it properly. And countries are divided on the level and timing of the SAF blending mandates as well as SAF feedstocks. For maritime fuels, the GHG reduction targets are a stumbling block, accompanied by discussions about on-shore power supply requirements, penalties and the geographical scope. Further questions are whether to mandate GHG emission cuts for all ships above a gross tonnage of 5,000t, as well as which fuels to include and how to count these towards GHG intensity reduction targets.

Some agreement has been achieved on less contentious issues, for instance allowing member states to oblige operators to uptake SAF blends at smaller airports, catching more aircraft operators under the blending obligation and defining "yearly" aviation fuel and compliance demonstration by fuel suppliers.

Legal proposals were made by the European Commission, in July, to phase maritime transport emissions into the EU ETS from 2023 to 1 January 2026 and mandate a reduction in the GHG intensity of marine fuels. Ships should reduce their average GHG intensity of the energy used on board by 6pc by 2030, by 49pc by 2050 and by 75pc by 2050, all from 2020 levels.

For SAFs, the commission wants aircraft landing at EU airports to uptake fuel with a 2pc SAF blend by 2025, 5pc by 2030, 20pc by 2035, 32pc by 2040 and 63pc by 2050. From 2030, the 5pc SAF target to be composed of a minimum share of 0.7pc of synthetic aviation fuels or aviation-certified renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBOs), rising to 5pc synthetic aviation fuels from 2035, 8pc from 2040 and 11pc in 2045.

Discussions on SAFs and maritime fuels have hosted similar reservations to those on an overarching revision of the EU's 2018 renewables directive (RED II), which proposes an EU target share of least 40pc renewable in EU gross final consumption of energy by 2030, aligning climate and energy legislation with the bloc's 55pc emissions-reduction target.

Beyond the level of ambition, Slovenia, while chairing discussions, has noted "several" states are against sub-targets for industry, notably the indicative 1.1 percentage point annual increase and a sub-target for RFNBOs. Similarly, energy ministers are divided over the indicative 1.1 percentage point increase in heating and cooling.

Renewables in transport is also contentious, with the 13pc GHG intensity reduction target for transport fuels seen as "too ambitious" for some states. And countries are divided over whether to shift the renewable transport target, currently a 14pc share of energy used in transport by 2030, to a GHG reduction target. Slovenia notes a "majority" of countries have reservations on increasing the sub-targets for advanced biofuels to at least 0.2pc in 2022, 0.5pc in 2025 and 2.2pc by 2030. Similarly, there is no enthusiasm for the proposed new 2.6pc sub-target for transport RFNBOs.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
31/01/25

Trump tariffs most likely to bite US east coast market

Trump tariffs most likely to bite US east coast market

Houston, 30 January (Argus) — The prospect of the US imposing 25pc tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico would most likely have the greatest impact on US Atlantic coast motor fuel markets. President Donald Trump repeated plans to impose the tariffs this weekend , although he said crude may be exempted from the plan. But a crude exemption would not matter in the case of Irving Oil's 320,000 b/d Saint John, New Brunswick, refinery, which is a regular source of gasoline and diesel to the US' upper Atlantic coast markets. The US imported roughly 595,000 b/d of oil products from Canada in October, according to the latest Energy Information Administration data, most of it bound for the Atlantic coast. New York Harbor spot market gasoline prices are currently around $2/USG, meaning a 25pc tariff on Canadian imports could up that price by as much as 50¢/USG. This could prompt buyers in New England or other East coast markets to look to other supply options. Canadian refiners could also start sending their product to west Africa or Latin America. In the US midcontinent, as much as 4.25mn b/d of US midcontinent refining capacity relies on heavy sour Canadian crudes for up to 70pc of their supplies. In theory, US midcontinent refiners could run lighter, US-produced grades. But there are relatively few pipelines serving the midcontinent with such grades and they would be much less profitable to refine compared to a pre-tariff WCS barrel. Chicago gasoline spot prices were just under $2/USG today, so a 25pc tariffs would also add 50¢/USG to prices. Chicago Buckeye Complex ultra low sulphur diesel (ULSD) prices were at $2.18/USG today while West Shore/Badger ULSD prices below that at $2.15/USG. Imports of Mexican refined products should be less of an issue as Mexico sent only 180,000 b/d of products to the US in October, according to the latest data. Counter tariffs on crude and oil products by Mexico or Canada would also be an issue for US refiners and blenders. US refiner Valero said today that the tariffs could cause a 10pc cut in refinery runs depending on how long the tariffs go and how fast they are implemented. By Dave Ruisard and Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Trump to impose 25pc tariffs on Canada, Mexico


30/01/25
News
30/01/25

Trump to impose 25pc tariffs on Canada, Mexico

Washington, 30 January (Argus) — President Donald Trump said today he will proceed with plans to impose tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico on 1 February and explicitly referenced their potential application to crude imports. "I'll be putting the tariff of 25pc on Canada, and separately, 25pc on Mexico," Trump told reporters at the White House. "We will really have to do that, because we have very big deficits with those countries. Those tariffs may or may not rise with time." Pressed to explain if his tariffs may exempt crude imports, Trump said he was not inclined to exclude them but has yet to make a decision. "We may or may not" exclude oil, Trump said. "It depends on what the price is, if the oil is properly priced, if they treat us properly." Trump added: "We're going to make that determination, probably tonight, on oil." The looming face-off on tariffs has unnerved US oil producers and refiners, which are warning of severe impacts to the integrated North American energy markets if taxes are imposed on flows from Canada and Mexico to the US. Industry trade group the American Petroleum Institute has lobbied the administration to exclude crude from tariffs. US refiner Valero said today that a 25pc tariff on Canadian imports would force it to find alternative sources of crude, potentially resulting in a 10pc cut to throughputs. Valero's refining footprint in the US Gulf coast allows it to source feedstocks from around the world, but there is a point where a limit on heavy feedstocks like those from Canada could affect production of refined products, said chief operating officer Gary Simmons. Nearly all of Mexico's roughly 500,000 b/d of crude shipments to the US in January-November 2024 were waterborne cargoes sent to US Gulf coast refiners. Those shipments in the future could be diverted to Asia or Europe. Canadian producers have much less flexibility, as more than 4mn b/d of Canada's exports are wholly dependent on pipeline routes to and through the US. Canadian crude that flows through the US for export from Gulf coast ports would be exempt from tariffs under current trade rules, providing another potential outlet for Alberta producers — unless Trump's potential executive action on Canada tariffs eliminates that loophole. Trump frequently makes the case that foreign suppliers are solely responsible for paying tariffs. In reality, US importers pay the tariffs, and such costs are typically passed on to consumers. In the case of Canadian and Mexican crude, the US refiners that buy from those countries would pay a tax on the value of crude imports. Whether the price of Canadian crude falls by a sufficient amount to offset the 25pc tariff would depend on the market power of individual US refiners and Canadian producers, as well as actions by the Alberta government, according to a recent report by the Congressional Research Service. US refineries with access to alternative suppliers could source crude from non-Canadian producers, potentially keeping their additional costs below 25pc. Conversely, import reductions could pressure prices for Western Canadian Select (WCS) crude. In turn, Alberta could reimpose a production curtailment policy in a bid to narrow WCS discounts, the report said. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Study calls for e-fuels bunker subsidies, GHG tax


30/01/25
News
30/01/25

Study calls for e-fuels bunker subsidies, GHG tax

New York, 30 January (Argus) — E-fuel subsidies and a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions tax is needed for e-fuels to compete as a bunkering fuel before 2044, said a study by maritime consultancy University Maritime Advisory Services (Umas) and the UCL Energy Institute. The study found that adding a multiplier of the GHG intensity credit given to e-fuels could help to make e-fuel use financially competitive, but it would have to be set at high levels at the start. Using a multiplier of two, where one ship running on zero emissions e-fuel could generate credits to offset three other similar ships operating on conventional fossil fuels, was not able to make e-fuels more competitive before 2041. The multiplier would have to be set initially at 15 in 2030, falling to 10 by 2035, to enable the competitiveness of e-fuels, concludes the study. Additionally, levying a GHG tax or fee of $150-$300/t of CO2-equivalent would also make e-fuels more competitive. A tax of $30-$120/t CO2e is close to the aggregate level of subsidies, and would not create a sustained promotion of e-fuels. Under the current marine fuel standards, a combination of fossil fuels, including LNG, biofuels and carbon capture and storage systems would be most competitive up until 2036. After, blue ammonia dual fuel ships would be the lowest-cost solution until 2044. Ships that were more competitive from 2027-2035 would have at least 25pc higher operating cost from 2040 onwards. Thus, if ship owners order newbuild vessels to maximize short-term competitiveness, the sector is at a "major risk of technology lock-in" and will not be as cost-effective for reaching net zero by 2050. The study models a 2027-build, 14,000 twenty-foot equivalent unit container ship. The vessel sails between Asia and Latin America using different marine fuels such as bio-methanol, e-methanol, LNG, bio-LNG, e-LNG, bio-marine gasoil (MGO), e-MGO and very low-sulphur fuel oil. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Tariffs could cut refinery throughput by 10pc: Valero


30/01/25
News
30/01/25

Tariffs could cut refinery throughput by 10pc: Valero

Houston, 30 January (Argus) — US refiner Valero is in a strong position to find alternative sources of crude if the US imposes a 25pc tariff on Canadian imports, but the switch could still cut throughputs by 10pc, the company said today. Valero's refining footprint in the US Gulf coast allows it to source feedstocks from around the world, but there is a point where a limit on heavy feedstocks like those from Canada could affect production of refined products, said chief operating officer Gary Simmons during a fourth quarter earnings call. "You might see a 10pc change in throughputs" depending on how long the tariffs go and how fast they are implemented, he said. Valero operates 1.6mn b/d of refining capacity in the US. President Donald Trump has threatened to impose 25pc tariffs on all imports from Canada and Mexico as soon as 1 February. But commerce secretary nominee Howard Lutnick said earlier this week that the tariffs may not be imposed if the countries cooperate on border security. Trump frequently makes the case that foreign suppliers are solely responsible for paying tariffs, while it is actually US importers that pay the tariffs. In the case of Canadian and Mexican crude, the US refiners that buy from those countries would pay a tax on the value of crude imports. Whether the price of Canadian crude falls by a sufficient amount to offset the 25pc tariff would depend on the market power of individual US refiners and Canadian producers, as well as actions by the Alberta government, according to a recent report by the Congressional Research Service. Valero does not have any details on how the tariffs would be applied and will just "have to deal with it when it comes up," Simmons said. The company reported record high throughputs of heavy sour crude in the fourth quarter of 2024. Heavy sour crude runs averaged 608,000 b/d, compared with 485,00 b/d in the same period in 2023. The increase showed the refining system's flexibility and the company's ability to secure and process the most economic crude oils, Valero said. By Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Marine biodiesel sales drop in Rotterdam port 4Q 2024


30/01/25
News
30/01/25

Marine biodiesel sales drop in Rotterdam port 4Q 2024

London, 30 January (Argus) — Marine biodiesel demand fell in the final quarter of last year in the port of Rotterdam, while LNG sales picked up ahead of the introduction of FuelEU Maritime regulations at the turn of the new year. Sales of marine biodiesel blends in Rotterdam fell by 13.8pc on the quarter and just under 50pc on the year in October-December. This contrasts with an increase of about 62pc on the quarter for marine biodiesel blend sales in Singapore, pointing to a continued trend of voluntary demand shifting east of Suez. Participants reported this trend throughout last year, with more competitive prices for the blends in Singapore. Argus assessed B24 dob Singapore, a blend comprising very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) and used cooking oil methyl ester (Ucome), at an average discount of $10.58/t against B30 Advanced Fatty acid methyl ester (Fame) 0 dob ARA in the final quarter of 2024. B24 dob Singapore was marked at an average discount of $119.34/t against B30 Ucome dob ARA. Consequently, shipowners seeking to deliver proof of sustainability documentation to their customers, to offset the latter's scope 3 emissions, shifted their marine biodiesel demand to Singapore when feasible. FuelEU Maritime regulations, which came into effect in January and require a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from vessels every year, will probably incentivise regulatory-driven demand for marine biodiesel blends. But the regional price dynamics between ARA and Singapore will probably remain relevant to regulatory-driven demand as well, as energy consumed from blends bunkered in Singapore can be mass balanced to be fully accounted for under the scope of FuelEU Maritime. The pooling mechanism within FuelEU Maritime would also allow for vessels operating on the east-west route to potentially utilise compliance generated from marine biodiesel blends bunkered in Singapore across other vessels that operate solely in Europe. LNG sales picked up by 19.5pc on the quarter and soared by 76.6pc on the year ahead of the introduction of FuelEU Maritime regulations at the start of 2025. Fossil LNG, depending on the type of engine used on board, can help shipowners with LNG-capable vessels meet their FuelEU compliance targets for 2025. The Gate LNG import terminal is planning to start operations at a second jetty for LNG bunker vessels in 2028, pointing to expectations of greater demand. Bio-LNG sales were reported for the first time in 2024 since small volumes in 2021, ahead of FuelEU Maritime regulations. Conventional bunker fuel sales comprising VLSFO, ultra-low sulphur fuel oil (ULSFO), marine gasoil (MGO), marine diesel oil (MDO), and high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) dipped by 4.7pc on the quarter but rose by 17.7pc on the year in October-December. VLSFO sales alone were marked higher than HSFO's for the first time at the port since the last three months of 2023. Total VLSFO volumes traded in the fourth quarter came to nearly 811,000t, down by 3pc from the previous quarter, while HSFO sales totalled 780,500t, down by 14pc. Market participants attribute this retail drop-off to considerable local HSFO supply-side constraints at the end of 2024. Thin volumes produced by CDUs at refineries in the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) hub meant imported volumes were needed to cover shortfalls. Refineries cut throughput runs, reducing residual byproduct output. Biomethanol sales dropped by over half on the quarter, under pressure from thin trading activity, but were 86pc higher on the year in the final quarter of 2024. Shipping giant Maersk has signed several letters of intent for the procurement of biomethanol and e-methanol from producers such as Equinor , Proman and OCI Global . But the European Commission's proposal to exclude automatic certification of biomethane and biomethane-based fuels for the Union Database for Biofuels if relying on gas that has been transported through grids outside the EU, could slow some negotiations for 2025 imports of biomethanol of US origin into the EU. By Hussein Al-Khalisy, Bob Wigin and Evelina Lungu Rotterdam bunker sales t Fuel 4Q24 3Q24 4Q23 q-o-q% y-o-y% VLSFO & ULSFO 1,004,398 1,045,774 847,862 -4 18.5 HSFO 780,437 906,737 643,218 -13.9 21.3 MGO/MDO 395,903 334,752 361,585 18.3 9.5 Conventional total 2,180,738 2,287,263 1,852,665 -4.7 17.7 Biofuel blends 118,201 137,175 233,108 -13.8 -49.3 LNG (m³) 263,068 220,120 148,933 19.5 76.6 bio-LNG (m³) 575 0 0 na na biomethanol 930 2,066 500 -55 86 Port of Rotterdam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more