Latest market news

Cop 27: Draft decision shows slow progress

  • Market: Emissions
  • 17/11/22

A draft of the Cop 27 UN climate summit cover decision released today reiterates many of the Glasgow Climate Pact goals agreed at Cop 26 last year, and does not mention a broader fossil fuel phase down.

The document repeats a request made at Cop 26 for all countries to revisit and strengthen their 2030 nationally determined contributions (NDCs) — countries' climate pledges — to align with the UN's 2015 Paris Agreement, and to update their long term strategies. The Paris Agreement aims to limit global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, and ideally to 1.5°C.

Only around 25 countries updated their NDCs before Cop 27, and a few more did so during the summit, but it is still not enough to meet the 1.5°C target. The document says the emission gap between pledges and what is needed to hit the Paris Agreement target represent "a grave concern".

The document reiterates the "urgency of action to keep 1.5°C in reach", but during informal consultations at the start of this week parties were unable to reach agreement on inclusion of stronger language to limit global warming to 1.5°C. This would be more ambitious than the Paris Agreement. The G20 summit of major economies, held this week, strengthened commitments, saying the group "resolves to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C", which could be viewed as an encouraging sign.

The text still makes no reference to a fossil fuel phase down, language pushed by India at the start of the summit and that has gained support, although the EU stressed it should not distract from efforts on phasing down coal power generation, as agreed at Cop 26.

But language on coal and fossil fuel subsidies does appear in this version of the cover agreement, echoing the Glasgow text. The new draft stresses the "importance of enhancing the share of renewable energy in the energy mix", and "encourages the continued efforts to accelerate measures towards the phase down of unabated coal power and rationalise inefficient fossil fuel subsidies". The language on fossil fuel subsidies differs from last year's text, focusing on rationalising rather than just "accelerating efforts towards" their phase-out.

The energy and cost of living crises have put efforts to phase out fossil fuel subsidies at risk. Subsidies are likely to increase this year, partly because of higher energy prices arising from Russia's war in Ukraine. The commitment in the draft Cop 27 text still does not set a deadline for a phase-out of inefficient subsidies. So far only G7 countries have one, for 2025.

Pan-African Parliament president Fortune Charumbira said today that the issue of fossil fuels cannot come "before other major commitments are delivered". Fossil fuels will remain a reality in terms of use until "we have financed the alternatives", he said.

On loss and damage, the document does not mention the creation of a new facility, but it welcomes the inclusion on the Cop 27 agenda of discussions on a new funding arrangement. Loss and damage refers to the destructive effects of global warming, and is a priority for many vulnerable countries experiencing extreme climate-related events such as storms and rising sea levels.

The draft decision "expresses deep concern towards the significant financial costs associated with the loss and damage for developing countries" and "reiterates the urgency of scaling up action and support". Many countries and observers said Cop will be a failure if parties fail to agree on the creation of a loss and damage fund this year, and progress on the issue could be critical to move forward with other negotiations.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
15/10/24

Tax credit delay risks growth of low-CO2 fuels

Tax credit delay risks growth of low-CO2 fuels

New York, 15 October (Argus) — A new US tax credit for low-carbon fuels will likely begin next year without final guidance on how to qualify, leaving refiners, feedstock suppliers, and fuel buyers in a holding pattern. The US Treasury Department this month pledged to finalize guidance around some Inflation Reduction Act tax credits before President Joe Biden leaves office but conspicuously omitted the climate law's "45Z" incentive for clean fuels from its list of priorities. Kicking off in January and lasting through 2027, the credit requires road and aviation fuels to meet an initial carbon intensity threshold and then ups the subsidy as the fuel's emissions fall. The transition to 45Z was always expected to reshape biofuel markets, shifting benefits from blenders to producers and encouraging the use of lower-carbon waste feedstocks, like used cooking oil. And the biofuels industry is used to uncertainty, including lapsed tax credits and retroactive blend mandates. But some in the market say this time is unique, in part because of how different the 45Z credit will be from prior federal incentives. While the credit currently in effect offers $1/USG across the board for biomass-based diesel, for example, it is unclear how much of a credit a gallon of fuel would earn next year since factors like greenhouse gas emissions for various farm practices, feedstocks, and production pathways are now part of the administration's calculations. This delay in issuing guidance has ground to a halt talks around first quarter contracts, which are often hashed out months in advance. Renewable Biofuels chief executive Mike Reed told Argus that his company's Port Neches, Texas, facility — the largest biodiesel plant in the US with a capacity of 180mn USG/yr — has not signed any fuel offtake contracts past the end of the year or any feedstock contracts past November and will idle early next year absent supportive policy signals. Biodiesel traders elsewhere have reported similar challenges. Across the supply chain, the lack of clarity has made it hard to invest. While Biden officials have stressed that domestic agriculture has a role to play in addressing climate change, farmers and oilseed processors have little sense of what "climate-smart" farm practices Treasury will reward. Feedstock deals could slow as early as December, market participants say, because of the risk of shipments arriving late. Slowing alt fuel growth Recent growth in US alternative fuel production could lose momentum because of the delayed guidance. The Energy Information Administration last forecast that the US would produce 230,000 b/d of renewable diesel in 2025, up from 2024 but still 22pc below the agency's initial outlook in January. The agency also sees US biodiesel production falling next year to 103,000 b/d, its lowest level since 2016. The lack of guidance is "going to begin raising the price of fuel simply because it is resulting in fewer gallons of biofuel available," said David Fialkoff, executive vice president of government affairs for the National Association of Truck Stop Operators. And if policy uncertainty is already hurting established fuels like biodiesel and renewable diesel, impacts on more speculative but lower-carbon pathways — such as synthetic SAF produced from clean hydrogen — are potentially substantial. An Argus database of SAF refineries sees 810mn USG/yr of announced US SAF production by 2030 from more advanced pathways like gas-to-liquids and power-to-liquids, though the viability of those plants will hinge on policy. The delay in getting guidance is "challenging because it's postponing investment decisions, and that ties up money and ultimately results in people perhaps looking elsewhere," said Jonathan Lewis, director of transportation decarbonization at the climate think-tank Clean Air Task Force. Tough process, ample delays Regulators have a difficult balancing act, needing to write rules that are simultaneously detailed, legally durable, and broadly acceptable to the diverse interests that back clean fuel incentives — an unsteady coalition of refiners, agribusinesses, fuel buyers like airlines, and some environmental groups. But Biden officials also have reason to act quickly, given the threat next year of Republicans repealing the Inflation Reduction Act or presidential nominee Donald Trump using the power of federal agencies to limit the law's reach. US agriculture secretary Tom Vilsack expressed confidence last month that his agency will release a regulation quantifying the climate benefits of certain agricultural practices before Biden leaves office , which would then inform Treasury's efforts. Treasury officials also said this month they are still "actively" working on issuing guidance around 45Z. If Treasury manages to issue guidance, even retroactively, that meets the many different goals, there could be more support for Congress to extend the credit. The fact that 45Z expires after 2027 is otherwise seen as a barrier to meeting US climate goals and scaling up clean fuel production . But rushing forward with half-formed policy guidance can itself create more problems later. "Moving quickly toward a policy that sends the wrong signals is going to ultimately be more damaging for the viability of this industry than getting something out the door that needs to be fixed," said the Clean Air Task Force's Lewis. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Lignite displaces gas in German power mix


15/10/24
News
15/10/24

Lignite displaces gas in German power mix

London, 15 October (Argus) — Rallying German gas prices have pushed a significant amount of gas-fired generation out of the country's power mix this month, opening space for lignite. Average daily gas-fired generation in Germany has slipped to 3.8GW so far this month from 4.2GW in September and August and 4.1GW in July. During that time, lignite-fired generation climbed to 9GW from 7.2GW in September and August and 7.4GW in July. Coal-fired generation has also edged down to 2.9GW so far this month from just over 3GW in September, but higher than the averages of 2.3GW in August and 1.4GW in July. Meanwhile, supporting demand for thermal-fired generation, German renewables output has fallen to 30.3GW so far in October from just under 32GW in September when wind generation stepped up, but slightly above the 29.5GW in August when wind output was lower. Remaining German power demand in recent weeks has been covered by imports, which have risen to a net 3.8GW so far this month from 3.4GW in September, but remained well below the 6.2GW in August. Electricity imports from neighbouring countries such as France are occasionally cheaper than domestic generation and can help fill in gaps between German power demand and supply. A combination of changing renewable output, higher gas prices, stable lignite prices and lower emissions prices have spurred changes in the German power mix. The German THE day-ahead has risen strongly since late July and prices have rallied in recent weeks against a backdrop of rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Meanwhile, German lignite-fired plants typically source fuel from nearby mines, substantially insulating domestic lignite prices from external market forces. German regulator Bnetza assumed earlier this year that domestic lignite would cost about €3/MWh in 2024-25. At the same time, near-term prices in the EU emissions trading system (ETS) — a key driver of competitiveness for German lignite-fired generation — have fallen. Prompt ETS allowances closed at €65.36/t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) on Monday, down from €72.14/t CO2e on 19 August, boosting the profitability of lignite-fired plants, which are the more CO2 intensive than coal and gas. Those recent price shifts have made output from lignite-fired plants with a typical efficiency of 36pc more profitable than normal 55pc-efficient gas-fired plants as well as coal-fired stations operating at 40pc efficiency, which have also become more profitable . By contrast, in the first eight months of this year, 36pc-efficient lignite-fired plants had competed tightly with 55pc-efficient gas-fired plants even as gas prices fell to the bottom of the coal-to-gas fuel-switching range ( see fuel-switching graph ). Buffer zone More competitive lignite-fired generation has also started acting as the domestic buffer to cover gaps between supply and demand left by renewable generation ( see power generation graph ). After Germany renewable generation dropped to 26.8GW on 2-9 October from a strong 45.5GW on 26-28 September, lignite-fired generation jumped to 10.1GW from 6.4GW — a 57pc gain — while gas-fired output only rose to 3.5GW from roughly 3GW and coal-fired generation increased to 2.9GW from 2.3GW. In December-July, when the gas and lignite fuel-switching range was tight, generation from both fuels reacted similarly to fluctuations in renewable output and both plant types buffered their generation based on demand ( see power generation graph ). And forward prices assessed by Argus suggest that lignite-fired generation could remain competitive against gas and coal-fired output in the German power mix next month. As of market close on Monday, November-dated fuel and emissions prices would place the operating costs of a 36pc-efficient lignite-fired plant during that time below those of a 55pc-efficient gas-fired plant and a 40pc-efficient coal-fired plant. That said, Germany's decreasing lignite and coal-fired generation capacity limits how much of the national power mix those plant types can provide. As of April, Germany had 82.4GW of gas-fired capacity, but just 15.1GW of lignite-fired capacity and 11.5GW of coal-fired plants, according to Bnetza. By Lucas Waelbroeck Boix Fuel switching range €/MWh Power generation by fuel, 7 day average GW Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EU agrees negotiating mandate for Cop 29


15/10/24
News
15/10/24

EU agrees negotiating mandate for Cop 29

Brussels, 15 October (Argus) — EU ministers have agreed a general negotiating mandate for the UN Cop 29 climate conference, calling for a new climate finance goal, but without mentioning a concrete amount or range of figures for this. The main point of the EU's mandate remains that of obtaining an "ambitious and balanced" agreement at Cop 29, to be held on 11-22 November in Baku, Azerbaijan. The deal should still hold out hope of maintaining global temperatures within 1.5°C of pre-industrial levels in the "light of the best available science", according to the EU position. The bloc's environment and climate ministers want a Baku text to move "us all forward towards long-term resilience". The text sticks to language in a previous draft , underlining the need for "transitioning away from fossil fuels", tripling renewable energy capacity, and doubling annual energy efficiency gains by 2030 — all points agreed at last year's Cop 28. Countries, and especially major economies, should significantly enhance their national climate plans — known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs) — with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions peaking before 2025, EU ministers said. NDCs should contain "economy wide absolute emission reduction targets" for all GHGs, they added. The EU will push for a global approach to carbon pricing. The bloc will "encourage" all jurisdictions to introduce or improve their own domestic carbon pricing mechanisms. And ministers stressed the need to "explore" innovative options for widening the sources of climate finance, including "carbon pricing, levies for implementing climate action" and the "scaling down of harmful incentives". That mirrors language in EU finance ministers' conclusions on international climate finance . Finance will be the key topic at Cop 29, where countries must finalise the details of a new climate finance goal . Funding needs for this are "in the space of… trillions" of dollars, Azerbaijan's lead negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev said this week. But a "realistic goal for what the public sector could directly provide and mobilise seems to be in the hundreds of billions", he said. The Cop 29 presidency hosted a series of 'pre-Cop' meetings on 8-12 October, including ministerial dialogues. Some progress was made, the presidency said. Ministers "must now return to their capitals to secure the mandates they need for the breakthroughs they must deliver. There is no excuse for anyone to arrive at Cop 29 without clear political support to make progress", incoming Cop 29 president Mukhtar Babayev said this week. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Japanese firms eye developing CCS project in Alaska


11/10/24
News
11/10/24

Japanese firms eye developing CCS project in Alaska

Tokyo, 11 October (Argus) — Two Japanese firms are looking to develop a carbon capture and storage (CCS) value chain between Japan and US' Alaska state to help achieve Japan's 2050 decarbonisation goal. Japanese trading house Sumitomo and Japanese shipping firm Kline today reached a deal to sign a joint research agreement with US independent Hilcorp, for a strategic partnership to capture CO2 in Japan and transport it on a large liquefied CO2 (LCO2) carrier to storage and injection facilities in Alaska. Oil and gas fields have been developed in Alaska since the 1950s and the total storage capacity of the CCS project is expected to be 50 gigatonnes, equivalent to 50 years' worth of Japan's CO2 emissions, Sumitomo said. The world's first LCO2 transportation for CCS is scheduled to start next year ahead of this project, Kline said. Japanese companies are gearing up efforts to seek overseas storage sites for CO2, as domestic storage sites would be insufficient to store all of the country's possible emissions. Tokyo aims to add 6mn-12mn t/yr of CO2 storage capacity domestically and internationally from 2030, with a target of 120mn-240mn t/yr by 2050. The government has projected that Japan will be able to store up to 70pc of its forecasted CO2 emissions of approximately 240mn t/yr in 2050. Japan's parliament in May allowed the government to ratify the 2009 amendment to the International Maritime Organization's London Protocol that will enable the export of CO2. By Reina Maeda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

UN carbon market regulator takes 'agile' approach


10/10/24
News
10/10/24

UN carbon market regulator takes 'agile' approach

Berlin, 10 October (Argus) — The regulator of the new UN carbon crediting mechanism under Article 6 of the Paris climate agreement decided on key rules this week, adopting an "agile" approach to difficult issues to allow the rules to adapt to "ever-evolving developments in addressing climate change". The Article 6.4 supervisory body decided at its meeting this week in Baku, Azerbaijan, to adopt standards on methodologies and greenhouse gas (GHG) removals open to additional guidance by parties at the UN Cop 29 climate conference in Baku next month. This will allow the supervisory body to review and further improve the standards "whenever necessary" and to "keep up with market developments", it said. The body has requested that the parties meeting at Cop 29 to endorse this approach. The standards will help project developers create and submit methodologies for their projects, to allow them to be registered under the new Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM), the group said. Article 6 takes a bottom-up approach to methodologies, allowing project developers to draw up their own methodologies provided they comply with the standard. The standard includes principles such as the downward adjustment of GHG mitigation paths to "encourage ambition over time" and the selection of a baseline against which the mitigation is measured that is below business-as-usual levels. It also includes provisions for equitably sharing the mitigation benefits between the participating countries. This could also be achieved through applying the so-called Sustainable Development Tool adopted at the meeting. The tool, a key objective of which is to set apart the PACM from its predecessor the clean development mechanism's indifference towards environmental and human rights, will require all participants to assess, demonstrate and monitor the environmental and human rights impacts of their projects. Activity participants must also notify the supervisory body of any potential reversal of the achieved mitigation within 30 days of becoming aware of the event. The supervisory body will establish a Reversal Risk Buffer Pool Account in the mechanism registry to compensate fully for avoidable and unavoidable reversals, by cancelling an equivalent amount of buffer Article 6.4 emissions reductions. The supervisory body has tasked experts on the so-called Methodological Expert Panel with continuing their work on various unresolved principles, such as developing a tool for assessing the reversal risk of removals, including the possible application of upper limits and specific risk factors. The supervisory body did not look into the issue of registries at this week's meeting, considered another tricky issue among several outlined by UK department for energy security and net zero head of carbon markets negotiations Dexter Lee at a conference in London this week. But speakers at the event noted a renewed willingness to agree on Article 6 rules this year. By Chloe Jardine Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more