Romania becomes net gas exporter

Market: Natural gas
01/12/22

Romania switched to net gas exports in late November for the first time in nearly a year and a half, as weak demand allowed it to balance on domestic production and storage alone.

Romania was a net exporter on 26 November and 28 November, according to data from system operator Transgaz. The country's net imports had already been weak earlier in the month and averaged 26 GWh/d on 1-28 November, well below the five-year average for the period of 87 GWh/d.

The main driver behind the switch to net exports was weak consumption. Domestic consumption of 312 GWh/d on 1-28 November was well below the five-year average for the period of 451 GWh/d, even with weather that was colder than normal over some of the period.

Domestic production has held roughly in line with recent-year averages, following a boost since June's start-up of the Midia field. Output was 262 GWh/d on 1-28 November, about 5 GWh/d short of the five-year average.

And Romania relied more on storage to meet demand during recent colder weather, avoiding an increase in imports. Withdrawals reached 109 GWh/d on 21-28 November. That said, average net withdrawals of 21 GWh/d on 1-28 November were still below the five-year average for the period of 66 GWh/d, as injections continued later than usual thanks to muted demand.

Balancing without Russian gas

Romanian firms might rely on domestic production and storage as far as possible this winter to avoid more costly imports, given their lack of access to Russian gas.

Romania used to import Russian gas in winter, when demand exceeds domestic production. But following Moscow's imposition of sanctions on its former subsidiaries, including WIEE Romania, Romanian firms no longer have any way of importing Russian gas, as their contracts are with these intermediaries and not directly with Gazprom's export arm.

And several market participants told Argus that the country's windfall tax has discouraged international firms from trading gas in Romania, weighing on liquidity. Romanian gas and electricity traders' margins have been taxed at 98pc since the start of September.

In a sign of an increased focus on domestic supply ahead of imports, the Romanian subsidiaries of Engie and Eon — the country's biggest suppliers — concluded deals with producer Romgaz for winter gas supply.

And Romanian firms that produce gas onshore or offshore are obliged to sell output at a capped price to residential suppliers and electricity generators, but only for the amount needed to cover public consumption. The ceiling price is set at 150 lei/MWh.

Romanian energy regulator Anre has also since April obliged suppliers to store at least 30pc of the gas in their portfolio intended for consumption by end users, encouraging heavier reliance on domestic storage.

Romania becomes attractive transit market

Some of the gas entering Romania has transited on to the higher-priced Hungarian market, with exports at Csanadpalota reaching new highs recently following a capacity expansion.

Exports to Hungary reached 57 GWh/d on 21-28 November, the highest they have been following a capacity expansion to 73.4 GWh/d from 50 GWh/d since the start of October.

Imports from Bulgaria at Negru Voda have closely matched exports at Csanadpalota, suggesting that firms may have purchased gas from Bulgaria and Greece and transited the supply through Romania on to Hungary.

And some of the supply entering Hungary could have been shipped on to other markets. There was a reconfiguration of flows around Hungary in November, with the country taking nearly no gas from Austria since the middle of the month and beginning brisk withdrawals from storage while exporting more to Slovakia.

By Brendan A'Hearn

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

21/10/24

Growing IPO pipeline revives interest in oil and gas

New York, 21 October (Argus) — A recent flurry of initial public offering (IPO) announcements by US oil and natural gas firms, driven by lower borrowing costs and higher commodity prices, signals a modest revival of investor appetite for a sector that has long been out of favour. Denver-based natural gas producer BKV made its trading debut on the New York Stock Exchange last month after raising $270mn, while Appalachian-focused Infinity Natural Resources has also filed to go public. Oil field services firms are also getting on in the act with HMH, backed by Baker Hughes and Norway's Akastor ASA, filing to sell shares. Energy companies are looking to take advantage of cheaper capital after the US Federal Reserve embarked upon its long-awaited cycle of interest rate cuts, with some possibly hoping to squeeze in share sales ahead of November's presidential election. Record highs for US benchmark indexes have also fuelled positive momentum, as well as an oil market that has been lifted by the escalating tensions in the Middle East, and US natural gas prices that have bounced off their recent lows. While price volatility has acted as a brake on the IPO market for oil and gas in the past, the hope is that pent-up demand is ready to be tapped as Wall Street slowly comes around to a sector that has spent the years since the pandemic repairing balance sheets after past excesses. An industry previously shunned by environmentally focused investors is now seeing signs of renewed engagement. And as the IPO climate improves, firms that show solid growth prospects and the ability to turn a profit will be among those that are most attractive. "We're going to see more people hitting the markets, whether it is traditional capital markets activity, but also more IPOs," law firm Baker Botts' corporate department chair, Samantha Hale Crispin, predicts. "Being able to access the capital markets provides name recognition, access to a broader type of capital, and flexibility." BKV listed its shares almost two years after first unveiling plans to go public. The largest gas producer in Texas' Barnett Shale basin, with operations also in the Marcellus shale in Pennsylvania, BKV sold 15mn shares at $18 apiece. That was slightly lower than the proposed price of $19-21. Infinity, which is backed by Pearl Energy Investments and Natural Gas Partners and operates more than 120 wells across 90,000 acres in the Utica and Marcellus shale basins, has also filed. And Peak Resources, an oil and gas producer active in the Powder River basin of Wyoming, is also gearing up for an IPO, according to a recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Private exit Despite the uptick in energy IPO announcements, there is some scepticism that the market is finally about to turn a corner, given speculation that some companies with robust cash flows are merely exiting for their private owners, with the run-up in oil prices providing the window needed. And given a pick-up in the wider IPO market, it is only natural to see oil and gas receive a boost as well. "For private equity to exit is probably driven as much by the current status of the market, which is up a bit because of the rate cuts, and the fact that these companies are ageing in their portfolios," University of Houston energy economist Ed Hirs says. However, others see momentum behind the recent IPO announcements that is likely to gain traction once the US election is out of the way, and scope for more deals in 2025. "Sitting on capital for too long is never a good thing, regardless of which type of industry player you are," Crispin says. "There's a real desire to put that to work." By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Investors hold more sway for shale than election

21/10/24

News

21/10/24

Investors hold more sway for shale than election

New York, 21 October (Argus) — Both sides in an increasingly fractious US presidential election campaign have set out their pitches to the oil industry, but the reality is that shareholders might wield more influence over the outlook for shale than who wins the White House. Market forces and corporate strategy, rather than government policy, arguably hold greater sway over a sector that has been turned upside down since emerging from the pandemic-induced price slump of 2020. As such, promises of support from Republican candidate Donald Trump, or the risk of more regulations if Democrat Kamala Harris wins, might have limited fall-out for a sector where capital discipline and a clamour for shareholder returns remain the guiding forces. "The industry is driven by market fundamentals, not by politics," consultancy Rystad Energy's senior analyst of upstream research, Matt Bernstein, says. "The US onshore industry has learned to live with a high degree of uncertainty, and the presidential election is just one of many factors on operators' radars." Changes in oil prices, increased efficiencies on the part of producers, as well as acquisitions intended to boost long-term growth, could all be more significant for a shale industry whose short-term prospects remain positive, Rystad says. The industry's shifting priorities have seen it abandon a previous strategy of chasing growth at all cost, and focus instead on boosting dividends and share buybacks. Most publicly listed shale firms are sticking to output growth targets of no more than 5pc/yr, under relentless pressure to keep costs under control. That the race for the White House might have little bearing on the industry can be seen in comments in a recent Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas survey, with some executives more concerned over whether the economy will face a slowdown. "The presidential election is a side-show in terms of actual effects for most energy firms," one respondent from an exploration and production firm said. Caution when merging One area where a potential win for the Democrats could have more wide-ranging repercussions is the approval process for mergers. A wave of shale consolidation that has seen more than $200bn of deals signed over the past year has attracted the attention of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that has cast a more wary eye over oil deals under Joe Biden's administration. Recent mega-mergers led by ExxonMobil and Chevron were only cleared by the antitrust regulator after two high-profile chief executives of takeover targets — Scott Sheffield of Pioneer Natural Resources and John Hess of Hess — were barred from the boards of the merged companies. The FTC accused the two of improper communications with Opec officials to keep prices high, allegations both denied. But with Harris already pledging a crackdown on price gouging — mostly in relation to the grocery sector so far — it would not be a stretch to imagine her attention also turning to antitrust issues and oil deals. "With all of the talk from the Harris campaign about price gouging, exploitation, those are words that historically have been hurled at the energy sector more than any other," former FTC chairman Bill Kovacic says. "So I would expect the scrutiny would be no less intense, maybe even more intense." Given the sector's commitment to spending restraint, doubts remain as to whether Trump could do anything to accelerate growth of US oil and gas production already at record highs. Even higher oil prices might not necessarily spur companies to step up spending, given that the price link with increased drilling activity has weakened, according to Rystad. Nor has Harris flagged any plans to impose stricter regulations or drilling restrictions, instead recognising record domestic production as a means of reducing reliance on foreign oil. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US elections offer energy transition juncture

21/10/24

News

21/10/24

US elections offer energy transition juncture

Washington, 21 October (Argus) — The 5 November elections are likely to have an outsized effect on the trajectory of US renewable energy growth, electrification of its economy, and investment in climate-related technologies, such as carbon sequestration and clean hydrogen. Vice-president Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, has embraced the energy transition and backed policies meant to support a "thriving clean energy economy". In 2022, she cast the tie-breaking vote for the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and its vast spending on clean energy, while serving alongside President Joe Biden to support regulations that would cut down on CO2 from power plants and accelerate the transition to electric vehicles (EVs). If elected, Harris would continue to enforce those climate-focused regulations and defend them from challenges in court. Those policy views are anathema to former president Donald Trump, who has made mocking the energy transition a recurring part of his stump speech. Wind energy is "bullshit" and responsible for causing cancer and killing whales, Trump claims without evidence. He wants to curtail government support for EVs, which he says are straining the grid and wasting taxpayer support, and to "terminate" the clean energy spending in the IRA. And he sees investment in batteries as a boon for China and is sceptical of using hydrogen in transport because he says the fuel is likely to "blow up". Trump plans to again pull the US out of the "horrendously unfair" Paris climate accord and "immediately stop" enforcement of Biden-era energy efficiency rules, his campaign says. Harris and Trump can unilaterally advance some of their related to clean energy through executive orders and regulatory action, such as revising which energy projects will qualify for billions of dollars in IRA tax credits. But fully repealing clean energy spending or overhauling permitting laws will hinge on control of the US Congress, which polls suggest could again end up with slim majorities in both chambers. Clean energy tax credits at risk The White House estimates that more than $265bn in clean energy investment has been announced since the passing of the IRA more than two years ago, with further energy spending backed by the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law . Those laws will deliver a combined $1 trillion or more in federal funding and tax credits for renewable energy, batteries, electric transmission, clean energy manufacturing, EVs and other climate-related spending over 10 years, according to some estimates. Harris has committed to carry through with that industrial policy and "expand our lead in clean energy innovation and manufacturing", her campaign says, with a goal of building a workforce that will benefit from addressing climate change. Harris wants to finish clean energy projects quickly and efficiently by "cutting red tape". If elected, Trump plans to "terminate the Green New Deal" and rescind all unspent funds in the IRA, which would free up revenue that could go to other priorities such as tax cuts. But he would face stiff opposition from the industry groups and Republican-led districts that are seeing billions of dollars of investments as a result of the law. In September, 18 House Republicans urged against a "full repeal" that they say would waste billions of dollars and undermine growth in their districts. "I hope we look at it in a surgical way and not just take a sledgehammer to it," Georgia representative Buddy Carter says. Oil industry officials back some tax credits in the IRA, such as the 45V tax credit for producing low-carbon hydrogen and an expanded tax credit for sequestering carbon. The hydrogen tax credit is driving "a lot of investment" across Republican-led states, ExxonMobil Low Carbon Solutions vice-president of advocacy Erik Oswald says. In the US, battery-only EVs are expected to account for more than half of car and passenger truck sales within eight years, under tailpipe standards that environmental regulator EPA finalised this year for model years 2027-32. The rule will require automakers to meet increasingly stringent CO2 limits through options such as more efficient engines and selling a greater share of hybrids and EVs. A tax credit of up to $7,500/vehicle from the IRA will support that regulatory goal, lowering the cost of purchasing EVs that are made in the US. But Trump says the tailpipe rule — which is being challenged by states and industry groups in court — is an "EV mandate" that will wipe out auto industry jobs and "end" the use of gasoline-powered vehicles. Trump regularly attacks EVs over what he says is the difficulty of finding charging stations, the added weight of batteries, their limited range and their use of imported parts from China. He previously rolled back fuel-economy standards for model year 2022-26 vehicles during his first term. Predictably, oil groups also oppose the EV tax credit. "We don't think it needs this level of support from taxpayers," refiner group American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers president Chet Thompson says. Harris has yet to say if she wants to change the tailpipe rule, but she rejects its characterisation as a mandate to go electric. "I will never tell you what kind of car you have to drive," she says. With EVs gaining market share globally, Harris says the US needs to develop its manufacturing capacity so it can remain competitive, something she says did not occur when Trump was in the White House. "When it came to building the cars of the future, Donald Trump sat on the sidelines and let China dominate," Harris says. A rare area of agreement between the campaigns is the threat that EV imports from China — some of which sell for less than $10,000 in China — could pose to US automakers. This year, the Biden-Harris administration issued a 100pc tariff on Chinese EVs in response to alleged "unfair trade practices". Trump says he will go further by imposing a "100pc, 200pc, 2,000pc tariff". And, if elected, Trump says he will tell Mexico and Canada that he wants to renegotiate his own trade agreement, the USMCA, as a way to block Chinese auto parts from being brought into the US through their borders without being subjected to tariffs. Regulatory deja vu In his first term, Trump dismantled climate regulations such as the Clean Power Plan, which attempted to cut CO2 emissions from existing power plants primarily by reducing how frequently coal and inefficient gas-fired generators would operate. If re-elected, Trump would again work to dismantle replacement regulations from the Biden administration, which would require most existing coal-fired plants to add carbon capture systems or retire by 2032. Harris is "shutting down power plants and destroying our electric grid", Trump says. Harris has yet to speak in depth on the power sector regulations, but offered support for "tackling the climate crisis" and holding "polluters accountable", her campaign says. If elected, she would be responsible for defending the regulations in court and issuing a replacement rule if it fails to survive litigation. Trump's push to dismantle vast numbers of environmental rules would occur in a relatively untested legal landscape, after the US Supreme Court this summer overturned the decades-old ‘Chevron doctrine' that tended to give federal agencies a built-in advantage in court. The Supreme Court in a separate ruling opened up the possibility of lawsuits against decades-old rules — a possible opening for a Trump administration to work with industry to chip away at long-standing regulations. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia’s Santos commissions Moomba CCS facility

18/10/24

News

18/10/24

Australia’s Santos commissions Moomba CCS facility

Adelaide, 18 October (Argus) — Australia's Santos has commissioned its 1.7mn t/yr Moomba carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in the onshore Cooper basin of South Australia state. The Australian carbon credit unit-generating project is running at full injection rates of up to 84mn ft³/d (865mn m³/yr) of CO2 with all five wells on line, Santos said, adding that the full 1.7mn t/yr capacity would depend on Cooper basin gas production. The CCS will be Australia's second largest by nameplate capacity after Chevron's controversial 4mn t/yr Gorgon CCS on Barrow Island, which has been criticised for failing to reach its sequestration goals because of problems with pressure management . Santos results Jul-Sep '24 Apr-Jun '24 Jul-Sep '23 y-o-y % ± q-o-q % ± Volumes ('000 t) GLNG (100pc) 1,300 1,338 1,370 -5 -3 Darwin LNG (100pc) 0 0 42 -100 -100 PNG LNG (100pc) 1,938 2,001 2,111 -8 -3 Santos' equity share of LNG sales 1,148 1,264 1,300 -12 -9 Financial LNG sales revenue ($mn) 766 762 821 -7 1 Total sales revenue ($mn) 1,269 1,313 1,436 -12 -3 LNG average realised price ($/mn Btu) 12.69 11.47 12.02 6 11 Oil price ($/bl) 83.24 89.48 89.97 -7 -7 Source: Santos Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US oil company filings put 'spotlight' on taxes

18/10/24

News

18/10/24

US oil company filings put 'spotlight' on taxes

Washington, 18 October (Argus) — Data showing some US-headquartered oil and gas firms paid less in taxes to the US than to foreign governments could be a focus in an upcoming Congress tax policy debate. ExxonMobil reported paying nearly $1.2bn to the US in 2023, and $5.6bn to the UAE, according to a first-time ‘Form SD' report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In its own report, Chevron says it paid nearly $1.2bn in the US, against $4bn to Australia. Independent Hess paid $190,000 in the US and $50mn to Malaysia. Industry officials say the data do not provide a comprehensive view of obligations, which can vary from country to country depending on the tax code and their operations. The payment disclosures also do not cover payroll taxes or state and local taxes, for example, and do not say if a company had carryover net operating losses or tax credits that reduced its overall tax bill in the US. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more