Marine fuel global weekly market update

Market: Biofuels, Fertilizers, Hydrogen, Natural gas, Oil products, Petrochemicals
10/04/23

A weekly Argus news digest of interest to the conventional and alternative marine fuel markets. Argus' offices were closed on 7 April. To speak to our team about accessing the stories below, please contact: oil-products@argusmedia.com.

Alternative marine fuels

6 Apr Indonesia ships first sizeable volume of UCO to the US Indonesia exported the first ever sizeable volume of used cooking oil (UCO) to the US in...

6 Apr Malaysia's Petronas sells ammonia on formula to Gemoil Malaysia's state-owned Petronas has sold...

6 Apr Brazil's diesel consumption drops in February Brazil's diesel consumption fell in February amid lower demand from the agriculture sector, while gasoline consumption increased.

5 Apr Planned e-methanol site in southern Spain progresses Project developer Cetaer is advancing plans to develop an e-methanol production site in ...

5 Apr West Virginia 2.2mn t/yr blue ammonia plant secures gas One of the largest blue hydrogen projects under development, in West Virginia, US, has secured a supply ...

4 Apr Biodiesel share in German fuel mix up in January The share of biodiesel in Germany's road fuel mix rose on the month in ...

4 Apr UK's Atome actualises Iceland green ammonia plans UK-based green hydrogen and ammonia firm Atome Energy has announced a ...

4 Apr France remained an RME biodiesel market in 2022 French domestic supply and demand for biodiesel remains dominated by ...

4 Apr LNG discount to methanol renews LNG bunker interest The premium for LNG compared with grey methanol flipped to a discount in ...

4 Apr US methanol spot prices sink to multiyear lows The US Gulf coast methanol spot price assessment for the front-month sank to ...

3 Apr Morocco's OCP targets 1mn t of green ammonia by 2027 Moroccan fertilizer firm OCP has announced ambitious green ammonia ...

3 Apr Ireland's ethanol, biodiesel demand edges higher in Feb Irish biodiesel and ethanol consumption increased on the month and the year in …

3 Apr Q&A: EU boosts green marine fuels, says OCI CEO Inclusion of shipping emissions under the EU's emissions trading system (ETS) and mandatory reduction in the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of marine fuels excites OCI Global and Fertiglobe chief executive Ahmed El-Hoshy. The ETS, GHG fuel intensity cuts for EU maritime fuels and upwards revised renewables targets are building the market, he told Argus.

3 Apr Methanex cuts April Asia methanol contract price Canada-based methanol producer Methanex has cut its Asian Posted Contract Price (APCP) to ...

Conventional marine fuels

6 Ap ExxonMobil workers end strikes at French refineries Workers at ExxonMobil's downstream sites in France are ending a...

6 Apr Capesize bulkers face ‘anemic' port congestion: BRS The recent rise in Capesize rates on the back of rebounding...

5 Apr US Gulf coast fuel oil output at 3½-year high in March US Gulf coast residual fuel oil production in March rose to the highest in more than...

5 Apr Croatia's Ina seeks diesel made from non-Russian crude Croatia's Ina has issued a tender to buy diesel on a...

5 Apr India removes crude windfall levy, halves diesel tax India has removed a windfall tax on crude production and...

5 Apr Non-Russia origin bunker fuel sold at premium in UAE Guaranteed non-Russia origin fuel oil has been trading at substantial ...

4 Apr Pemex output of less-desired HSFO at 10-year high Pemex produced 305,100 b/d of heavy sulfur fuel oil (HSFO) in February, a high not seen since ...

4 Apr Japan sees higher oil product demand in FY2023-24 Japan's oil product demand is forecast to increase in the April 2023-March 2024 fiscal year, on the back of ...

4 Apr Lowest European diesel crack spread since war began European non-Russian diesel prices have fallen to their lowest premium against crude since ...

3 Apr Higher Asian bunkers may lift Pacific Panamax rates Freight rates for Pacific dry bulk Panamax vessels could continue to rise on ...

3 Apr NE Asian MR freight rises on higher Chinese exports Freight rates for clean Medium Range (MR) tankers from northeast Asia are higher, supported by ...

3 Apr Oil tanker backlog grows as French strikes rumble on Strikes over pension rights are continuing to hamper operations at French refineries, while a ...

3 Apr Russian Black Sea product exports rise Product loadings at Russian Black Sea ports increased by 60pc ...

3 Apr Fire hits Pertamina's Indonesian Dumai refinery An explosion and a fire hit state-controlled Indonesian refiner Pertamina's ...

3 Apr Boarded tanker found but some crew missing A tanker that was boarded by pirates on 25 March has been recovered, but ...

3 Apr German's Bayernoil refinery extends partial shutdown The shutdown at the Neustadt section of the 207,000 b/d Neustadt-Vohburg refining complex is ...

3 Apr Germany's costly return to diesel cargo market looms German diesel stockpiles are steadily sinking and ...

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

23/12/24

Viewpoint: US LPG cargo premiums poised to fall

Houston, 23 December (Argus) — The booming US LPG export market has fueled record spot fees this year for terminal operators that send those cargoes abroad, but those fees are poised to fall next year as additional export capacity comes online. US propane exports surged over the past two years, hitting an all-time high of 1.85mn b/d in the first quarter of this year, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Terminal fees for spot propane cargoes out of the US Gulf coast hit an all-time high of Mont Belvieu +32.5¢/USG (+$169.325/t) in mid-September. US propane production is expected to grow by another 80,000 b/d in 2025 to 2.22mn b/d while the outlook for domestic consumption is fairly steady, at 820,000 b/d next year — meaning even more propane will be pushed into the waterborne market. But that is dependent on US infrastructure keeping up with the pace of production. US export terminals in Houston, Nederland and Freeport, Texas, have run at or above capacity for the last two years given the thirst for cheaper US feedstock, largely from propane dehydrogenation (PDH) plant operators in China. This demand has created bottlenecks at US docks, and midstream operators like Enterprise, Energy Transfer, and Targa have rushed to ramp up spending on both pipelines and additional refrigeration to stay ahead of the wave of additional production. US gas output spurs LPG exports As upstream producers have ramped up natural gas production ahead of new LNG projects, most producers are counting on LPG demand from international outlets in Asia to offload the ethane and propane the US cannot consume. For the past four years, Asian buyers have been more than happy to oblige. US propane exports to China rose from zero in 2019, when China imposed tariffs on US imports, to an average of 1.36mn metric tonnes (t) per month in January-November 2024, according to data from analytics firm Kpler, making China the largest offtaker of US shipments. US exports to Japan averaged 480,000t per month throughout most of 2024, and exports to Korea averaged 460,000t per month in the first 11 months of 2024. China, Korea, and Japan received 52pc of US propane exports in 2024, up from 49pc in 2020, according to data from Vortexa. Strong demand in Asia has kept delivered prices in Japan high enough to sustain an open arbitrage between the US and the Argus Far East Index (AFEI). Forward-month in-well propane prices at Mont Belvieu, Texas, have remained well below delivered propane on the AFEI. In 2020, Mont Belvieu Enterprise (EPC) propane averaged a $143/t discount to delivered AFEI — a spread that has only widened as additional PDH units in Asia have come online. During the first 11 months of 2024, the Mont Belvieu to AFEI spread averaged a hefty $219/t, leaving plenty of room for wider netbacks in the form of higher terminal fees for US sellers, especially as a wave of new VLGCs entering the global market has left shipowners with less leverage to take advantage of the wider arbitrage. The resulting wider arbitrage to Asia has kept US export terminals running full for the last two years. So when a series of weather-related events and maintenance in May-September limited the number of spot cargoes operators could sell and delayed scheduled shipments, term buyers willing to resell any of their loadings could effectively name their price. This spurred the record-high premiums for spot propane cargoes in September. New projects may narrow premium An increase in US midstream firm investments in additional dock capacity and added refrigeration in the years ahead could narrow those terminal fees, however. Announced projects from Enterprise and Energy Transfer, in particular, will add a combined 550,000 b/d of LPG export capacity out of Houston and Nederland, Texas by the end of 2026. Enterprise's new Neches River terminal project near Beaumont, Texas, will add another 360,000 b/d of either ethane or propane export capacity in the same timeframe. These additions are poised to limit premiums for spot cargoes by the end of 2025. Already, it appears the spike in spot cargo premiums to Mont Belvieu has abated for the rest of 2024. Spot terminal fees for propane sank to Mont Belvieu +14¢/USG by the end of November. The lower premiums come not only as terminals resume a more normal loading schedule, but at the same time a surplus of tons into Asia ahead of winter heating demand has narrowed the arbitrage. The spread between in-well EPC propane at Mont Belvieu fell from $214.66/t to $194.45/t during November. A backwardated market for AFEI paper into the second quarter of 2025 means US prices are poised to fall more in order to keep the spread from narrowing further. By Amy Strahan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Viewpoint: Protectionist policies muddy US PE outlook

23/12/24

News

23/12/24

Viewpoint: Protectionist policies muddy US PE outlook

Houston, 23 December (Argus) — Potential new tariffs combined with protectionist policies from other importing countries are clouding the outlook for growth in the US polyethylene (PE) market heading into 2025. US president-elect Donald Trump threatened a 25pc tariff on all imports from Canada and Mexico, and at times has threatened as much as a 60pc tariff on all goods imported from China. Any new tariffs open the US up to retaliatory tariffs from the three countries, which have historically been among the top destinations for US PE exports. Brazil, another major trading partner with the US, recently raised import tariffs on PE to 20pc. On top of that, Brazil is in the midst of an anti-dumping investigation into US PE, which if successful would raise the tariff on US PE by an additional 21.4pc, bringing the total tariff for US PE in Brazil to 41.4pc. US PE exports in the first 10 months of 2024 totalled roughly 11.6mn t, with 16.4pc sold to China, 13.3pc sold to Mexico, 10.8pc sold to Brazil and 7pc sold to Canada , according to data from Global Trade Tracker (GTT). US PE producers are increasingly relying on exports, particularly with new capacity still set to come online in the next two years. This includes a new 600,000 t/yr linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE)/high density polyethylene (HDPE) swing plant from Dow set to start in the second half of 2025, as well as 2mn t/yr of HDPE capacity from Chevron Phillips Chemical's joint venture with Qatar-based QE in 2026. Exports as a percentage of total US and Canadian PE sales has been growing since 2016, when it was less than 25pc to crossing the 50pc threshold for the first time in November of this year, according to data from the American Chemistry Council (ACC). ACC data combines the US and Canada and considers trade between them as domestic rather than exports. With the US and Canadian PE markets largely functioning as one, the potential tariffs on product from Canada could cause problems for US buyers as well as Canadian suppliers, whose competitiveness in the region could be limited by new tariffs. "It would be a huge problem," said one US PE buyer who purchases resin from suppliers in both countries. For one particular grade of PE, the buyer said there are only two suppliers, including one producer in Canada and one in the US. If tariffs were imposed on Canadian material, it would suddenly make that particular grade more expensive because it would mean the US producer would no longer need to match competitive offers from Canada. Retaliatory concerns While US buyers are concerned about having to pay new duties on imports from Canada, US producers are also worried about potential retaliatory tariffs from other countries, such as China, and new duties and potential tariffs in Brazil. US PE exports to China totaled roughly 1.9mn t in the first 10 months of 2024, an amount that could not be easily absorbed by many other countries if new tariffs limit sales into that country. And in Brazil, US PE exports totaled roughly 1.26mn t in 2024 through October, another huge chunk that is at risk if the new anti-dumping duties against US PE are implemented. "Brazil is a huge market for the US. It's a big deal," said one US trader. "Producers can ship to countries around Brazil, but that will not cover everything we are losing. Where will it all go?" New outlets are opening up for US product in places such as Europe, where some global capacity has shut down. ExxonMobil, for instance, announced in April it was permanently shutting down its Gravenchon cracker and associated derivative plants in France, including a 420,000 t/yr HDPE-LLDPE swing unit. With the closure of that plant, sources have said ExxonMobil is exporting more volume from its cost-advantaged US assets to the region. But there is a limit to how much US export volume can be absorbed because of shutdowns in other regions. While many market participants are hopeful that proposed tariffs will not materialize, the uncertainty is making it difficult to plan for 2025, sources said. "Speculating on it is a waste. You don't know what is going to happen first, you don't know what the reaction is going to be," said one buyer. "All you can do is try to get the lowest prices you can and work a little bit of flexibility into your contracts." By Michelle Klump Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: Tight US phosphate supply may ease

23/12/24

News

23/12/24

Viewpoint: Tight US phosphate supply may ease

Houston, 23 December (Argus) — US phosphate buyers expect tight supply to ease next year after a lackluster fall application season left bins fuller, while unfavorable affordability will likely curtail spring demand. Tight P2O5 supply concerns driven by supply disruptions were of frequent concern among market participants earlier this year when DAP prices were roughly $80-100/st higher than price levels at the start of this December and MAP prices were at least $20/st higher. In May, a brush fire at major US phosphate producer Mosaic's Riverview facility in Florida caused a decrease in output. Market fundamentals tightened further throughout the summer and into early fall because of several hurricanes that made landfall in Louisiana and Florida, which reduced production from Mosaic and producer Nutrien's facilities. Higher phosphate values, lower crop prices and the resulting deterioration in affordability in the last six months of 2024 compared to 2023 deterred farmer buying interest. Some US buyers bought more triple superphosphate (TSP) throughout the summer as it became more economically appealing for the fall despite its lower nutrient content relative to MAP or DAP. The overall disinterest from farmers to use phosphate products this fall left higher-than-expected inventories across the Corn Belt that will carry over into next year and likely alleviate supply concerns along the Mississippi River for this spring. The US for the 2024/25 fertilizer year so far has imported less DAP and MAP compared with previous years, likely a result of poor affordability and farmer disinterest. Roughly 762,000 metric tonnes (t) of combined DAP and MAP were imported into the US from July through October, down from 34pc for the same period during the 2023/24 fertilizer year and 3pc lower than the five-year-average, according to US Census Bureau data. The absence of Moroccan producer OCP's phosphate products will continue to tighten US market fundamentals for the 2024/25 fertilizer year. The US Department of Commerce recently raised the phosphate import duty for OCP to 16.8pc from a preliminary rate of 14.2pc for calendar year 2022 and forward if it goes unchallenged. But most domestic buyers have been able to source product from elsewhere, like Jordan, Australia and Saudi Arabia. The US market also imported nearly 290,000t of TSP from July through October. That was 30pc higher than a year earlier and 70pc higher than the five-year-average, reflecting its recent appeal as a more affordable product. Affordability remains a headwind for demand in the spring as well. Based on the ratio between select phosphate barge prices and corn futures, farmer purchasing power for DAP and MAP has weakened throughout 2024 compared with 2023. This forces farmers to sell more of their crops to afford a ton of phosphate fertilizer. Market participants expect spring demand in 2025 to be lower than the robust demand seen last spring and for the market to be well supplied as a result. "Unless a big run on phosphate happens [this spring], we are looking at more supply than people know what to do with," one seller relayed. By Taylor Zavala Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: European HVO demand to rise in 2025

23/12/24

News

23/12/24

Viewpoint: European HVO demand to rise in 2025

London, 23 December (Argus) — European demand for hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), or renewable diesel, will be supported in 2025 by a combination of higher mandates for the use of renewables in transport, and by changes to EU member state regulations on the carryover of renewable fuels tickets, like in Germany and the Netherlands . European HVO production could grow by more than 400,000t in 2025, if announced projects are completed in time. Most new plants have the flexibility to switch to sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production, in the form of hydrotreated esters and fatty acids synthesised paraffinic kerosene (HEFA-SPK). But those seeking to import HVO into the EU will face barriers. Definitive EU anti-dumping duties (ADDs) on Chinese biodiesel and HVO will be imposed by mid-February , and anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties are already in place for HVO and biodiesel of US and Canadian origin . Flows of US-origin HVO to the UK are unimpeded as transposed EU duties were removed in 2022 . A clean slate... Against a headwind of gradually shrinking diesel demand, national transport renewables mandates are increasing. These ambitions rise again under the next iteration of the EU's Renewable Energy Directive (RED III), for which member states face a May 2025 transposition deadline. Optimism in the biofuels markets will be tempered by experiences in 2024. The low value of renewable fuel tickets — tradeable credits generated primarily by the sale of biofuel-blended fuels — in major European demand centres has weighed on supplier appetite for physical biofuels. This includes the relatively expensive HVO that can be blended in much greater volumes than cheaper fatty acid methyl esters (Fame). A portion of these tradeable tickets can usually be carried over from one obligation year to the next — as was done from 2023-24 — extending pressure on physical biofuel demand. But Germany has approved a law removing the option for companies to carry over excess 2024 greenhouse gas (GHG) certificates through both 2025 and 2026, aimed at resetting the outlook for physical renewables demand. Obligated parties will need start from scratch to meet their annual GHG savings targets — at 10.6pc for 2025 and 12.1pc for 2026 — resulting in greater demand for physical biofuels including HVO. In the Netherlands, the tickets carryover will be reduced from 25pc to 10pc for companies with an annual blending obligation. ...follows volatility Prompt HVO assessments firmed significantly late in 2024 — albeit from long-term lows — driven by short-term demand in the Netherlands at a time of tight regional supply. HVO (Class II) fob ARA range, a European benchmark based on HVO produced from used cooking oil (UCO), peaked at $1,500/m³ as a premium to escalated gasoil by 14 November — or a 122pc increase from the start of October — equating to $2,652.91/t on an outright basis. Assessments then fell back to a $860/m³ premium a week later, when the market rebalanced as suppliers looked to reroute prompt volumes. Before the rise, prices had hovered around historically soft levels for a sustained period. Sweden's decision to slash its GHG emissions mandate for the 2024-26 period due to fuel price concerns, and the low ticket prices have kept a lid on values. The HVO (Class II) outright price averaged around $1,625/t over 1 January-31 October 2024, down by around $580/t compared with the same period of 2023. While fundamentals now point to growth in European HVO use, the futures curve is backwardated. Those in the market may yet take a position that aligns with this viewpoint, but recent volatility has stunted forward trade. By Toby Shay Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: US tax fight next year crucial for 45Z

23/12/24

News

23/12/24

Viewpoint: US tax fight next year crucial for 45Z

New York, 23 December (Argus) — A Republican-controlled Congress will decide the fate next year of a federal incentive for low-carbon fuels, setting the stage for a lobbying battle that could make or break existing investment plans. The 45Z tax credit, which offers greater subsidies to fuels that produce fewer emissions, is poised to kick off in January. Biofuel output has boomed during President Joe Biden's term, driven in large part by west coast refiners retrofitting facilities to process lower-carbon fats and oils into renewable diesel. The 45Z tax credit, created by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), was designed to extend that growth. But Republicans will soon control Washington. President-elect Donald Trump has dismissed the IRA as the "Green New Scam", and Republicans on Capitol Hill, who had no role in passing Biden's signature climate legislation, are keen to cut climate spending to offset the steep cost of extending tax cuts from Trump's first term. Biofuels support is a less likely target for repeal than other climate policies, energy lobbyists say. But Republicans have already requested input on 45Z, signaling openness to changes. Republicans plan to use the reconciliation process, which enables them to avoid a Democratic filibuster in the Senate, to extend tax breaks that are scheduled to expire in 2025. "I want to place our industry in a place to make sure that the biofuels tax credit is part of reconciliation," said Kailee Tkacz Buller, president of the National Oilseed Processors Association. But lawmakers "could punt the biofuels discussion if stakeholders aren't aligned." A decade ago, biofuel policy was a simple tug-of-war between the oil and agriculture industries. Now many refiners formerly critical of the Renewable Fuel Standard produce ethanol and advanced biofuels themselves. And the increasingly diverse biofuels industry could complicate efforts to present a united front to Congress. Farm groups worry about carbon intensity scoring hurting crop demand and have lobbied to curtail record-high feedstock imports, to the chagrin of some biorefineries. Those producers are no monolith either: Biodiesel plants often rely more on local vegetable oils, while ethanol producers insist on keeping incentives that do not discriminate by fuel type and some oil majors would back subsidizing fuels co-processed with petroleum. Add airlines into the picture, which want greater incentives for aviation fuels, and marketers frustrated by 45Z shifting subsidies away from blenders — and the threat of fractious negotiations next year becomes clear. There are options for potential compromise, according to an Argus analysis of comments submitted privately to Republicans in the House of Representatives, as well as interviews with energy lobbyists and tax experts. The industry, frustrated by the Biden administration's delays in clarifying 45Z's rules, might welcome legislative changes that limit regulatory discretion regardless of what agency guidance eventually says. And lobbyists have floated various ways to appease agriculture groups without kneecapping biorefineries reliant on imports, including adding domestic content bonuses, imposing stricter requirements for Chinese-origin used cooking oil, and giving preference to close trading partners. Granted, unanimity among lobbyists is hardly a priority for Republican tax-writers. Reaching any consensus in the restive caucus, with just a handful of votes to spare in the House, will be difficult enough. "These types of bills always come to down to what's the most you can do before you start losing enough votes to pass it," said Jeff Navin, cofounder of the clean energy advocacy firm Boundary Stone Partners and a former House and Senate staffer. "Because they can only lose a couple of votes, there's not much more beyond that." And the caucus's goal of cutting spending makes an industry-wide goal — extending the 45Z credit into the 2030s — even more challenging. "It is a hard sell to get the extension right away," said Paul Winters, director of public affairs at Clean Fuels Alliance America. Climate costs Cost concerns also make less likely a simple return to the long-running blenders credit, which offered $1/USG across the board to biomass-based diesel. The US Joint Committee on Taxation in 2022 scored the two-year blenders extension at $5.5bn, while pegging three years of 45Z at less than $3bn. An inconvenient reality for Republicans skeptical of climate change is that 45Z's throttling of subsidies based on carbon intensity makes it more budget-friendly. Lawmakers have other reasons to not ignore emissions. Policies elsewhere, including California's low-carbon fuel standard and Europe's alternative jet fuel mandates, increasingly prioritize sustainability. The US deviating from that focus federally could leave producers with contradictory incentives, making it harder to turn a profit. And companies that have already sunk funds into reducing emissions — such as ethanol producers with heavy investments in carbon capture — want their reward. Incentives with bipartisan buy-in are likely more durable over the long run too. Next time Democrats control Washington, liberals may be more willing to scrap a credit they see as padding the profits of agribusiness — but less so if they see it as helping the US decarbonize. By Cole Martin Tax credit changes 40A Blenders Tax Credit 45Z Producers Tax Credit $1/USG Up to $1/USG for road fuels and up to $1.75/USG for aviation fuels depending on carbon intensity For domestic fuel blenders For domestic fuel producers Imported fuel eligible Imported fuel not eligible Exclusively for biomass-based diesel Fuels that produce no more than 50kg CO2e/mmBTU are eligible Feedstock-agnostic Carbon intensity scoring incentivizes waste over crop feedstocks Co-processed fuels ineligible Co-processed fuels ineligible Administratively simple Requires federal guidance on how to calculate carbon intensities for different feedstocks and fuel pathways Expiring after 2024 Lasts from 2025 through 2027 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more