Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Indian oil minister warns of consequences of Opec+ cuts

  • Market: Crude oil, Oil products
  • 04/10/23

India has been a key actor in the reshaped oil market of the past two years, absorbing much of Russia's redirected crude exports to cement its position among the world's fastest-growing oil demand countries. And it is pursuing further growth in oil products, through ambitious plans for refinery construction. But it remains a price-taker, and has been vocal on the need to allow developing economies room to breathe. India's oil minister Hardeep Singh Puri spoke to Argus at the Adipec conference in Abu Dhabi on 3 October about Opec+, oil prices and supply, and those refinery plans. Edited highlights follow:

You were expressing concerns around Opec production cuts when prices were around $75/bl. Now it is a different situation, and we are at around $90/bl. What is your message to Opec and Opec+ ministers? They are about to meet again to decide if any changes are needed to policy.

There is a context to everything. When I was expressing concern, even then I said it is your sovereign right, every producer's sovereign right, to decide how much crude oil you want to produce. You tell me that you don't determine the price, to which I say my understanding is that the amount of oil which is produced and released into the market in turn determines the price.

So, when at $75/bl, I was making a philosophical point. Today, well the price has come down by $5/bl since yesterday, but I'm making a point in a different context. What has happened in the last few months is that 5.2mn b/d of oil production has been taken off through voluntary production cuts. I am not getting into who has done it or why it was done. As against 102mn b/d that you had, you're down by 5.2mn b/d. Now, what has happened is they say that "we are trying to anticipate" because there is a reduction in demand. This is neither here nor there. You have got a problem on your hands.

This has happened once earlier. In 2008, the price had gone up to $130/bl and it came crashing down to $36/bl, which was neither in the interest of producers nor of consumers.

My limited point is that if you think that an unrealistic price can be taken and sustained by the market, then I place the following facts before you. It is not my opinion, the fact is half the world is either under, in, or slightly below recession. Even the economies which are not in recession are flirting with the whole idea of recession. Quarter to quarter, growth is 0.1pc down, 0.8pc up — that is not a very healthy situation.

Secondly, clearly you have a lot of inflationary liquidity caused by stimulus packages etc during the pandemic. You have the liquidity in the market, people have been trying to raise interest rates to mop up the liquidity. If on top of that you get high prices, then it tips that inflationary situation into a really big [arc]. That is the consistency in my argument of between $75/bl and $90/bl.

I talk to the main companies in the world, some of them think, well, it will peak and then come down to $70-75-80/bl. That's neither here nor there. We have to be responsible for what we do.

On behalf of India, my position has always has been that it's a sovereign right to determine how much you want to [produce], but don't be unmindful of the consequences. And it can become a self-fulfilling prophecy that demand will drop because people don't have the capacity to sustain it. My take is that in the last 18 months this has driven some 100mn people into abject poverty. People have gone back to using unconventional or non-conventional firewood for cooking and other purposes.

Therefore, it's not [a question of] how much it affects India. Of course India would be happier if oil prices were $80/bl or below, but India will survive. India has the capacity. We are also a major producing country now, we're also a major exporting country now. But it's a question of what happens in the global economy, which is far from recovered from a number of crises.

What about the idea that higher prices are needed to drive the investment required to sustain production in the longer run?

I have heard this argument many times earlier. Sure, there should be more investment. But when you take 5.2mn b/d out, it is not due to a lack of investment. You've taken it out because you want to do supply-side management.

So, if we talk about India's crude imports, the pattern of crude imports has obviously changed in the last year and a half or so. First we saw rising imports from Russia and then reduced flows from the Middle East. Over the last few months, we have seen something of a reversal on that side. How do you see this evolving going forward?

I think it's a very simple explanation. The Indian government doesn't buy oil. We tender. Our companies, some of them are purely private-sector companies, while some are public sector, but at arms length. They will issue tenders and they will buy oil from wherever they can get it at the cheapest price.

There was a time before February 2022 when our total imports from Russia wouldn't show up in any calculation. They were what you guys call de minimis — 0.2pc. It didn't show up. But you know where the market started going and Russia wanted to export etc. The Russians still produce 11mn b/d and they consume 4mn b/d or so. They still have to sell the 7mn b/d. So, what happens if India is not buying it? And if India starts buying Middle Eastern oil instead, then the price will go up even more. So, it's a complicated situation.

My own sense is that this price sensitivity being a determinant should also be seen in terms of the diversification we have done. Earlier we used to buy from 27 countries — we are buying from 39 countries now. And then there are all manner of people who come in and say, well, we want to sell oil. As long as I'm clear it's not sanctioned oil or something like that, we will buy it.

In terms of the Russian oil payment structure, is that something done in rupees?

There are some discussions on it. I think we've done a rupee payment with the UAE in one consignment, but it is a small percentage — 10pc only.

So, this is not something we are likely to see much more of in the future?

No, no, we would be happy to do it but then it takes two to tango. You need to work on an ecosystem to be able to do that. Somebody asked me today if I see de-dollarisation. I think it's too early for that. I still see the US as the major economy, the world's largest economy that's going to be around for a long time.

A big Saudi delegation came to India after last month's G20 summit. Were there any discussions around the Ratnagiri refinery joint venture with Saudi Aramco?

The discussion is still on but let me give you a perspective on that. Typically, a refinery in India is about 11mn t/yr (220,000 b/d). This predates me as minister. The discussion in Ratnagiri was for a large refinery of 60mn t/yr, which is huge. So, I think you're probably better off in terms of sure ground footing to have three refineries of 20mn t/yr each because there are local issues. Not just in India, even outside, I don't know if anybody has experience in producing and running a refinery of 60mn t/yr. It is very high.

We are keen on it. We are expanding our refining capacity. We're at about 252mn t/yr, we are taking that to 300mn-330mn t/yr and ultimately to 400mn-450mn t/yr. We have very good relations with the Saudis. Very important, not only in the energy sector, but elsewhere. But on individual projects, I would not know. We have a lot of actors who would act on this.

There were issues regarding land ownership around the refinery. Is there anything that could be done from the government side to move things along?

The government will encourage, but I think it's better if you can break it into three 20mn t/yr refineries rather than a 60mn t/yr one. There has been a lot of talk about it.

When you see the Saudis in China, for example, you're seeing a lot of downstream investment going into China. Is this something India is also looking at and thinking you'd like to attract as well?

We are open to all manner of investments. But obviously Indian companies will look at bilateral investments in terms of what is win-win for them. If they're already strong in an area, why would they want outside investment now? Fortunately, for the energy sector, we have a large number of companies who are doing very well. IOC, ONGC, HPCL and BPCL, they are doing well but are also looking to acquire assets outside. So, it is a question of synergies and doing good commercial negotiations.

So focusing on Saudi investment is not something India is necessarily looking to do?

India is looking to do business with everybody. India, we have $16bn of investment in Russia — Russia has $13bn of investment in India. There is a lot of Saudi investment which we welcome to India, from the UAE or all over the world.

Following recent discussions with Iraq, there was an announcement that India would like to increase oil imports beyond the total 1bn bl that it currently takes annually. Is there any reference point for the size of such an increase?

It's all price sensitivity. In India, the government does not do the oil buying. We don't do the target setting either. Typically, we used to import 4mn-5mn b/d roughly for our refining, out of which we equally divided 800,000 b/d between four or five suppliers, and the rest would come from outside. I've seen the Iraqis move up very quickly. I think it's over 1mn b/d [that Iraq supplies to India] now if you look at the total capacity. I see that the supply is increasing. And there is a good reason for all this. This is a tender which is being floated and you decide if you want to respond with a price. Some others may be discussing charging an Asian premium or some extra price etc, obviously the market will move away from that.

So this is more about economics than a political initiative?

There is no politics in this. We are happy with the politics of everyone. You know ultimately it is the price at which you can bring it to the consumer.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Oil slumps ahead of tariffs, Brent nears $60/bl


09/04/25
News
09/04/25

Oil slumps ahead of tariffs, Brent nears $60/bl

Singapore, 9 April (Argus) — Crude oil futures fell further in Asian trading today, hours before new US tariffs on imports from a range of key trading partners are due to take effect. Benchmark WTI and Brent futures each fell by more than 4pc in early trading to hit new four-year lows. The front-month June Brent contract on Ice fell by as much as 4.2pc to a low of $60.18/bl. Brent has not traded below $60/bl since February 2021. The Nymex front-month May crude contract fell by 4.8pc to a new four-year low of $56.70/bl. At today's lows, both benchmark contracts have now fallen by 20pc since US president Donald Trump announced his tariff plans on 2 April. Trump's so-called "reciprocal" taxes on imports from selected trade partners are due to come into force at 12.01am ET (05:01 GMT) on 9 April. Trump's 10pc baseline tariff on imports from nearly every foreign country already went into effect on 5 April. Cumulative tariffs on US imports from China imposed since Trump returned to power will rise to 104pc, after Trump this week added 50pc to previously announced rates. By Kevin Foster Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Keystone oil pipeline shut down after ND spill: Update


08/04/25
News
08/04/25

Keystone oil pipeline shut down after ND spill: Update

Adds latest pricing for US, Canadian sour crudes. Calgary, 8 April (Argus) — North American sour crude prices rose relative to their benchmarks today after the 622,000 b/d Keystone pipeline carrying Canadian crude was shut down following a spill in North Dakota. Canadian crude prices on either side of the spill diverged in Tuesday's trading, with Western Canadian Select (WCS) at Hardisty, Alberta, trading between a $9.15-11/bl discount to the CMA Nymex, with the midpoint representing a widening of about $1/bl day-over-day. WCS at the Texas Gulf coast was up by about 45¢/bl from its prior assessment, trading at a $2.60/bl discount to CMA Nymex. Fellow Canadian heavy sour Cold Lake meanwhile was up by a similar level, trading between $2.25-$2.65/bl discounts against CMA Nymex. The Keystone system is a major route for Canadian heavy crude destined for both the US midcontinent and the Gulf coast. Pipeline operator South Bow initiated a shutdown at 8:42am ET Tuesday after the leak occurred about 6 miles south of Kathryn, North Dakota, according to North Dakota environmental quality program manager Bill Suess. A pipeline employee working on a pump station along the route heard what he described as a "mechanical bang" prompting him to shut down the pipeline, which took about two minutes, Suess said. Crude was then seen surfacing in an agricultural field about 300 yards south of the pump station, where it was contained. Suess said there is no impact to a nearby stream. South Bow estimates about 3,500 bl was released. No restart timeline The company and government officials did not have an estimate for when the pipeline would restart. Next steps involve assessing the area for other utilities before excavating down to the 30-inch pipeline to make repairs. The US Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) said it has dispatched personnel to the scene to conduct a failure investigation. Today's upset is the latest of several incidents to disrupt the market since it was commissioned in 2010. The pipeline halted flows for more than three weeks in December 2022 after it spilled about 12,937 bl of oil in Washington County, Kansas. A crack in a flawed weld was determined to be the cause. Once fixed, PHMSA allowed the line to operate again, but at a reduced pressure. Only last month did PMHSA give South Bow the green light to increase pressure again . Other US prices affected Louisiana-delivered Mars and Thunder Horse widened their premiums over the Domestic Sweet (DSW) benchmark by over 30¢/bl, trading at 80¢-$1/bl premiums and $1.80-$1.90/bl premiums to the basis, respectively. Texas-delivered Southern Green Canyon (SGC) traded as strong as a 60¢/bl discount against the Cushing basis Tuesday morning, after trading at $1/bl discount for the prior two sessions. April DSW was exchanged for May in the Cushing physical spot market at premiums as high 60-70¢/bl, from roughly 45¢/bl on the final day of the April trade month on 25 March. In the futures market, May Nymex WTI has moved up to end the session at a 48¢/bl premium to June, rising from a 26¢/bl premium at settlement in the prior session. DSW is the assumed grade for delivery into the Nymex contract. It is blended to specifications in Cushing and is comprised of various crudes, including Canadian grades. The appreciating differentials came despite pressure from weak export demand from the US Gulf coast. By Brett Holmes, Mykah Briscoe and Amanda Smith Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US faults EU carbon fee during tariff fight


08/04/25
News
08/04/25

US faults EU carbon fee during tariff fight

Washington, 8 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration is citing the EU's upcoming tariff on carbon-intensive imports as one of the "unfair trade practices" that justified a tariff response. Trump has said a 20pc tariff on most EU goods and a higher tariff on many other key trading partners — set to take effect after midnight — are "reciprocal" to other countries' tariffs and non-tariff barriers, even though those tariffs are calculated based on each country's trade deficits and imports with the US. Trump has yet to even identify which trade policies he wants other countries to change before he would withdraw tariffs his administration expects will raise $600bn/yr in new revenue. But the US Trade Representative's office, in a social media post on Monday made in "honor" of Trump's tariffs, identified the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) — which will collect a carbon-based levy on imports such as steel, cement and fertilizer — as one of the examples of what it sees as an unfair trading practice. The Trump administration estimates $4.7bn/yr of US exports would be affected by the CBAM, which is set to take effect in 2026. "These EU regulations undermine fair competition, penalizing US companies while providing advantages to EU-based competitors," the US Trade Representative's office wrote in a series of posts on Tuesday that also criticized India and Thailand for imposing import restrictions on ethanol produced in the US. White House officials say more than 70 countries have approached the administration seeking deals on the tariffs since they were announced nearly a week ago. But with just hours before the tariffs take effect, Trump has yet to announce any definitive agreements to withdraw the tariffs. Instead, he has rejected offers from countries to zero out some of their tariffs. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen on Monday said the EU was "ready to negotiate" on tariffs, and would zero out its tariffs on industrial imports if the US agreed to do the same. But Trump on Monday said that offer was not enough. "We have a deficit with the European Union of $350bn, and it's gonna disappear fast," Trump said. "One of the ways that that can disappear easily and quickly is they're gonna have to buy our energy from us." Today, Trump said he had a "great call" with South Korea's acting president Han Duck-soo that created the "probability of a great DEAL for both countries." Trump cited a potential agreement that might include large-scale purchases of US LNG and investments tied to the 20mn t/yr Alaska LNG export project. Trump and his cabinet believe the tariffs will align with a goal to achieve "energy dominance" and increase the amount of US energy exported abroad. "At the end of the day, we're going to have growing American exports and reindustrialize the country," US energy secretary Chris Wright said today during an interview on CNBC. Trump's tariffs have already caused a selloff in equities and, according to many analysts on Wall Street, a higher likelihood of a recession. Oil prices have dropped because of a "sudden change in the economic outlook, whereas everyone just honestly 10 days ago was expecting modest but steady positive growth in the US", non-profit group Center for Strategic and International Studies' senior fellow Clayton Seigle said today. Republicans have largely backed Trump in his imposition of tariffs, with the hope the tariffs will be lifted as part of trade negotiations. But some Republicans have started criticizing the rationale for the tariff policy. "Whose throat do I get to choke if this proves to be wrong?" US senator Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina) said in a hearing today with the US trade representative Jamieson Greer. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Mexican peso weakens on US tariff fears


08/04/25
News
08/04/25

Mexican peso weakens on US tariff fears

Mexico City, 8 April (Argus) — The Mexican peso has weakened in recent days amid growing fears that US president Donald Trump's new wave of tariffs could derail the US economy and, in turn, slash Mexico's economic growth, financial analysts said. After Trump announced a series of new import tariffs on what he dubbed "Liberation Day" on 2 April, the peso initially reacted positively, as Mexico was largely spared from the measures, thanks to protections under the US-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) free trade agreement. The current tariff structure largely remains in place, which means zero tariffs on products under the USMCA agreement, except for steel, aluminum and finalized// assembled automobiles. Auto parts under USMCA still face zero tariffs. These exceptions, and other non-USMCA-compliant products, maintain 25pc tariffs on non-US content, analysts Barclays said. The peso appreciated more than 3.2pc to Ps19.97/$1 on 3 April from Ps20.4/$1 on 2 April, according to data from Mexico's central bank (Banxico). The exemptions could make Mexico more attractive in the medium- and long-term to manufacturers aiming to avoid US tariffs, Barclays said. Yet, investors are now concerned about the broader economic fallout of the escalating US-China trade conflict. "The Mexican peso is one of the most depreciated currencies [as of 7 April], because even though Mexico has not been hit with reciprocal tariffs and benefits from USMCA, the economic impact of tariffs on the US economy could significantly affect Mexico," said Gabriela Siller, chief economist at Mexican bank Banco Base. The peso weakened to Ps20.50/$1 on 4 April, from Ps19.97/$1 on 3 April, and continued weakening, closing at Ps20.69/$1 on 7 April, a 2.3pc depreciation over the last week. Year over year, the peso has tanked 21pc, affected by multiple reforms diminishing Mexico's business environment that passed in late 2024, Trump's electoral victory in November, and now by Trump's tariffs. Mexico's GDP is expected to grow by 0.2pc this year, according to a new Citi survey of 32 bank analysts, with nine forecasting zero or negative growth because of the potential fallout from US trade policy. On 1 April, Mexico's finance ministry lowered its 2025 GDP forecast to 1.5–2.3pc, down from 2–3pc. That's still more optimistic than the central bank and private analysts, who expect growth of only 0.7pc , citing uncertainty over US policy and tariff threats. By Édgar Sígler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more