Guyana rejects Ven claiming province as its own

Market: Crude oil
22/03/24

Guyana rejected Venezuela's declaration of the resource-rich Essequibo province as its newest state today, another move in the century-long territorial dispute that has cast a shadow over highly prospective offshore oil and gas fields.

Venezuela's national assembly declared the province that forms the western two-thirds of Guyana as a state on Thursday, saying the move reflects the result of a referendum in December.

Guyana has rejected Venezuela's move, which ignores a December agreement between presidents Irfaan Ali and Nicolas Maduro "that they would do nothing to make the dispute worse," Guyana's home affairs minister Robeson Benn said today.

"This is highly regrettable and it is a violation of the principles of the good faith discussions which were undertaken in December and more latterly in Brazil," Benn said.

Benn did not indicate Guyana's next move to address the issue.

Venezuela said it would call the region Guayana Esequiba and consider it formally created when the declaration is published in that country's official gazette.

The territorial dispute dates to colonial times, when the UK acquired British Guyana, which included the disputed territory, without establishing a clear border with Venezuela. The dispute has prevented the countries from agreeing on their maritime boundary.

It has intensified since 2016 when US major ExxonMobil made several oil finds in the deepwater Stabroek block that partially overlaps the disputed waters.

The UN's International Court of Justice is to determine the merits of Venezuela's claim to Essequibo, but Venezuela has rejected the ICJ's role. It is seeking direct bilateral talks on the dispute, which Guyana refuses.

By Canute James

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

31/12/24

US crude output at record 13.46mn b/d in Oct: EIA

Calgary, 31 December (Argus) — US crude production in October rose to a record high 13.46mn b/d on sustained strength in Texas and New Mexico, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) said today in its Petroleum Supply Monthly report. Output rose from 13.2mn b/d in September and from 13.15mn b/d in October 2023. The prior record of 13.36mn b/d was set in August. Texas, home to 44pc of the country's crude production, pumped out a record 5.86mn b/d in October, up from 5.8mn b/d in September and up from 5.57mn b/d in October 2023. New Mexico, which shares the prolific Permian basin with Texas, produced 2.08mn b/d in October, ticking down by 5,000 b/d from record highs set in August and September but up from 1.8mn b/d in October 2023. US offshore crude output in the Gulf of Mexico rebounded to 1.85mn b/d in October after hurricane activity in September cut production to 1.57mn b/d. Still, US Gulf of Mexico output was down from 1.94mn b/d in October 2023. Monthly production changes inland were mixed, with North Dakota falling to 1.16mn b/d in October from 1.21mn b/d in the month prior. Bakken shale basin producers had to contend with wildfires during the month and effects are still lingering for some, state officials said earlier this month. Colorado output rose in October to the highest in more than four years at 499,000 b/d. This was up from 476,000 b/d in September and the highest level for the state since March 2020. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Viewpoint: 2025 Hardisty heavy diffs may remain strong

31/12/24

News

31/12/24

Viewpoint: 2025 Hardisty heavy diffs may remain strong

Calgary, 31 December (Argus) — Heavy crude spot differentials in Alberta are expected to remain strong into next year, even with growing oil sands production and possible US import tariffs. After years of cost-overruns and construction delays, the 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) commenced on 1 May, nearly tripling the capacity of crude able to reach Canada's Pacific coast and providing Alberta oil sands producers with increased access to buyers on the US west coast and Asia-Pacific. Extra egress capacity for Alberta crude westward has pulled previously apportioned volumes away from Enbridge's 3mn b/d Mainline system — Canada's main method of export to ship crude south to US refiners in the midcontinent and Gulf coast. In the fourth quarter, apportionment averaged just over 1pc for both light and heavy crude on the Mainline, significantly lower than the average apportionment of 21pc for lights and heavies in the fourth quarter last year. While president-elect Donald Trump's looming blanket tariff on all Canadian imports would re-direct more Albertan crude westward via TMX to Asia- Pacific buyers, many believe the tariff would be too harmful to US midcontinent refiners for Trump to actually carry out his threat. Prior to TMX's commencement, high apportionment combined with rising crude production heading into the winter months forced more crude onto railcars, which typically requires a $15/bl to $20/bl spread between Western Canadian Select (WCS) at Hardisty Alberta, and Houston, Texas, for uncommitted shippers to profit. With the redirection of apportioned volumes to buyers in the west, Canadian heavy spot differentials in Alberta have strengthened in a quarter when discounts have generally widened in recent years. Argus's WCS Hardisty assessment averaged a $12.08/bl discount to the CMA Nymex WTI during fourth quarter Canadian trade cycle dates, $11.52/bl stronger than the $23.61/bl discount averaged in the fourth quarter a year prior. Yet, crude output in Alberta's key oil sands is expected to rise heading into 2025, with production levels reaching record-high levels this year. Alberta crude output was 4.2mn b/d in October, according to the latest Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) data, up by 9.4pc year from a year earlier and the second highest monthly production on record. Alberta oil sands producers, meanwhile, have increased their crude production guidance for next year. Suncor expects to pump out 810,000-840,000 b/d across its upstream sector in 2025, up by 5pc from 2024. Cenovus expects to increase production next year by 4pc to between 805,000-845,000 b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d), and Imperial Oil plans to boost upstream production by 2pc to 433,000-456,000 boe/d. Egress capacity remains ample despite rising production heading into 2025. Total crude pipeline egress capacity out of Alberta is expected to be over 4.6mn b/d in 2025, with shippers still yet to utilize uncommitted space on the 890,000 b/d Trans Mountain pipeline. About 712,000 b/d or 80pc of the system is reserved for contracted shippers, with the remaining 20pc available for uncontracted shipments. With unconstrained egress capacity expected to persist, Suncor and Cenovus have both assumed WCS at Hardisty will average a strong $14/bl discount to WTI in 2025. In the near term, Trump's plans to impose a blanket 25pc tariff on all Canadian imports would threaten some US demand for Canadian crude. Yet, while some traders are pricing in the reality of US tariffs, most market participants are skeptical of whether Trump's tariff plans would extend to Canadian crude due to the co-dependency between Albertan producers and some US refiners. US midcontinent refiners, many of whom were financial backers of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, are dependent on Canadian crude given a lack of access to alternative heavy sour crudes suited for their refineries. Canadian grades represent approximately 70pc of the US midcontinent refinery feedstock, with the remainder largely sourced in the US. US importers may take more crude from countries including Saudi Arabia, given the country has plenty of spare capacity to increase the production of heavy sour crude favored by US midcontinent refiners. However, replacing Canadian crude with waterborne supplies would result in a substantial increase in tanker demand. In August, only around 370,000 b/d of the 3.8mn b/d of Canadian crude imported by US refiners moved on tankers, Vortexa data show. Even if US refiners can replace Canadian and Mexican heavy crude, they are expected to face higher landed costs and, potentially, less reliable supplies. By Kyle Tsang Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: US Supreme Court tees up more energy cases

31/12/24

News

31/12/24

Viewpoint: US Supreme Court tees up more energy cases

Washington, 31 December (Argus) — The US Supreme Court is on track for another term that could significantly affect the energy sector, with rulings anticipated in the new year that could narrow environmental reviews and challenge California's authority to set its own tailpipe standards. The Supreme Court earlier this month held arguments in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v Eagle County, Colorado , a case in which the justices are being asked to decide whether federal rail regulators adequately studied the environmental effects of a proposed 88-mile railway that would transport 80,000 b/d of crude. A lower court last year found the review, prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), should have analyzed how building the project would affect drilling and refining. Business groups want the Supreme Court to issue an expansive ruling that would limit NEPA reviews only to "proximate" effects, such as how rail traffic could affect nearby wildlife, rather than reviewing distance effects. The court recently agreed to hear a separate case that could restrict California's unique authority under the Clean Air Act to issue its own greenhouse gas regulations for newly sold cars and pickup trucks that are more stringent than federal standards. Oil refiners and biofuel producers in that case, Diamond Alternative Energy v EPA , say they should have "standing" to advance a lawsuit challenging those standards — even though they could now show prevailing in the case would change fuel demand — based on the alleged "coercive and predictable effects of regulation on third parties". These two cases, likely to be decided by the end of June, follow on the heels of the court's blockbuster decision in June overturning the decades-old "Chevron deference", a foundation for administration law that had given federal agencies greater flexibility when writing regulations. Last term, the court also limited agency enforcement powers and halted a rule targeting cross-state air pollution sources. This term's cases are unlikely to have as far-reaching consequences for the energy sector as overturning Chevron. But industry officials hope the two pending cases will provide clarity on issues that have been problematic for developers, including the scope of federal environmental reviews and the ability of industry to win legal "standing" to bring lawsuits. Two other cases could have significant effects for the oil sector, if the court agrees to consider them at a conference set for 10 January. Utah has a pending complaint before the court designed to force the US to dispose of 18.5mn acres of "unappropriated" federal land in the state, including oil-producing acreage. Utah argues that indefinitely retaining the land — which covers about a third of Utah — is unconstitutional. In another pending case, Sunoco and other oil companies have asked for a ruling that could halt a series of lawsuits filed against them in state courts for alleged damages from greenhouse gas emissions. President-elect Donald Trump's re-election could create complications for cases pending before the Supreme Court, if the incoming administration adopts new legal positions. Trump plans to nominate John Sauer, who successfully represented Trump in his presidential immunity case, as his solicitor general before the Supreme Court. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: Trump tariffs may shift crude flows to USWC

30/12/24

News

30/12/24

Viewpoint: Trump tariffs may shift crude flows to USWC

Houston, 30 December (Argus) — President-elect Donald Trump's proposed 25pc tariff on Canadian and Mexican imports could redirect key imported oil grades from the US west coast, opening avenues for displaced Latin American crudes to reappear. The tariffs, which Trump announced on 25 November, could displace about 9pc of the crude US west coast refiners import. Canadian crude flows from the newly expanded 890,000 b/d Trans Mountain pipeline system, which recently have drawn purchases in the US west coast, would force barrels to Asia-Pacific . Mexican crude sellers would divert crude to other outlets as well, like Europe or Asia-Pacific. Refiners on the US west coast increased purchases of Canadian grades after the May startup of the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX). Cheaper prices and closer proximity to Vancouver, British Columbia, where TMX crude loads, allowed the heavy sour crudes to find favor along the US west coast. But the proposed tariffs could raise landed TMX prices, no longer making it the cheapest heavy sour option. US west coast buyers would pay a 25pc import tariff to US Customs and Border Protection on TMX crude once it has entered port. US west coast refiners received around 169,000 b/d of crude from the Vancouver area since the pipeline came on line in May, up from less than 40,000 b/d a year earlier, data analytics firm Vortexa shows. Around 60pc of Mexico's crude exports in 2024 went to the US, mostly to the US Gulf coast, according to Vortexa data. Tariffs could lead to a drop in prices to adjust to a tariffed American market or for Mexican crude going more often to other destinations such as Europe or Asia-Pacific. Spain, South Korea and India, were the second, third and fourth most common destinations for Mexican crude exports in 2024, respectively. Mexico's crude production and export infrastructure is concentrated on the country's east coast, making exports to Asia-Pacific difficult. Mexico would need to invest in building exporting infrastructure from the west coast to improve trade routes to Asia, market participants say. But Mexico's state-owned oil company Pemex plans to continue cost-cutting measures, led by recently elected President Claudia Sheinbaum, so infrastructure expansion is unlikely. Other Latin crudes could also experience a rise after being displaced by the commencement of TMX in May. Since then, heavier crudes from countries such as Colombia, Ecuador and Argentina have found more frequent routes to the US Gulf coast and Asia-Pacific. Market participants believe lighter Brazilian grades could find routes to the US west coast as TMX supply increases in China. China imported 683,000 b/d of Brazilian crudes in 2024, c ompared with 180,000 b/d of imports to the US west coast from Brazil, according to Vortexa. Sources say the tariffs are a bargaining chip by the incoming administration, and participants are skeptical they will be implemented by the Trump administration. Instead, the tariffs could exclude crude and other commodities. More than $3.3bn of goods and services cross the US-Canada border each day, according to Canada's Fall Economic Statement (FES), which notes Canada is the largest market for 36 US states. Market participants are vocally against the proposed tariffs. Tariffs on crude and refined products "will not help our industry compete, nor will they support US energy dominance and affordability for consumers," the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufactures said on 27 November . Cenovus is also trying to explain to policy makers in the incoming Trump administration how tariffs on Canada could impact the energy system in North America. But the incoming administration shows no sign of backing off the tariffs for 2025. By Rachel McGuire and João Scheller Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Viewpoint: MEH-Midland spread to remain wider in 2025

26/12/24

News

26/12/24

Viewpoint: MEH-Midland spread to remain wider in 2025

Houston, 26 December (Argus) — WTI Houston's premium to WTI in Midland, Texas, is set to hold at 50¢/bl or wider in 2025, boosted by swelling volumes headed toward the Gulf coast as Houston grows in importance as a center for price discovery. The locational spread between WTI Houston and Midland rose steadily throughout 2024, averaging 49¢/bl year-to-date and widening as high as $1.41/bl during the June trade month as the 1.5mn b/d Wink-to-Webster pipeline was taken offline for repairs. In 2023, the spread averaged 21¢/bl. Trading activity for WTI at Oneok's Magellan East Houston (MEH) terminal — both in the physical and financial markets — climbed to all-time highs in 2024. Reported trade month volumes for WTI Houston swelled to 1.26mn b/d during the December trade cycle, a high for the year, and just 0.8pc below its previous record. On 16 December, WTI Houston trade closed the day at 153,000 b/d for the January trade cycle, the highest single-day trade volume in the history of Argus assessments of the grade. In financial markets, WTI Houston trade activity broke records in 2024, with open interest on CME's WTI Houston futures contract climbing to an all-time high of 412,519 lots — each 1,000 bl — on 21 November. MEH demand up despite export slowdown Trading activity broke records even as US crude exports slowed in the latter half of 2024 on Chinese economic woes that dampened Asian demand. New Chinese stimulus initiatives, namely relaxed fiscal and monetary policy , are meant to reverse that trend, but it remains to be seen if the efforts will work. Further challenges weighing on the US export market are a strengthening dollar combined with a high degree of uncertainty surrounding president-elect Donald Trump's proposed tariff plans, which feature ratcheting-up trade tensions with China even more. Multiple projects to add Permian takeaway capacity at the Texas Gulf coast are in various stages of planning, which could eventually open the window for ever-larger WTI export volumes, and further support WTI Houston against Midland. But industry participants have grown skeptical of the need for new export terminals or other projects. Midstream companies showed little enthusiasm for pitching new coast-bound pipelines from the Permian basin in their end-of-year investor reports . Key firms previously sought more takeaway capacity before the Covid-19 pandemic, when WTI Houston premiums to WTI in Midland consistently topped $1/bl, which would help recoup pipeline construction costs. As it stands, the roughly 3mn b/d total available pipeline capacity from the Permian basin to the Houston area is likely to remain static in coming years. This status quo for onshore infrastructure will help prop open the Houston-Midland WTI premium for the coming year, even if export demand fails to picks up in 2025. By Gordon Pollock WTI Houston-WTI Midland spread Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more