Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Indian oil minister warns of consequences of Opec+ cuts

  • Market: Crude oil, Oil products
  • 04/10/23

India has been a key actor in the reshaped oil market of the past two years, absorbing much of Russia's redirected crude exports to cement its position among the world's fastest-growing oil demand countries. And it is pursuing further growth in oil products, through ambitious plans for refinery construction. But it remains a price-taker, and has been vocal on the need to allow developing economies room to breathe. India's oil minister Hardeep Singh Puri spoke to Argus at the Adipec conference in Abu Dhabi on 3 October about Opec+, oil prices and supply, and those refinery plans. Edited highlights follow:

You were expressing concerns around Opec production cuts when prices were around $75/bl. Now it is a different situation, and we are at around $90/bl. What is your message to Opec and Opec+ ministers? They are about to meet again to decide if any changes are needed to policy.

There is a context to everything. When I was expressing concern, even then I said it is your sovereign right, every producer's sovereign right, to decide how much crude oil you want to produce. You tell me that you don't determine the price, to which I say my understanding is that the amount of oil which is produced and released into the market in turn determines the price.

So, when at $75/bl, I was making a philosophical point. Today, well the price has come down by $5/bl since yesterday, but I'm making a point in a different context. What has happened in the last few months is that 5.2mn b/d of oil production has been taken off through voluntary production cuts. I am not getting into who has done it or why it was done. As against 102mn b/d that you had, you're down by 5.2mn b/d. Now, what has happened is they say that "we are trying to anticipate" because there is a reduction in demand. This is neither here nor there. You have got a problem on your hands.

This has happened once earlier. In 2008, the price had gone up to $130/bl and it came crashing down to $36/bl, which was neither in the interest of producers nor of consumers.

My limited point is that if you think that an unrealistic price can be taken and sustained by the market, then I place the following facts before you. It is not my opinion, the fact is half the world is either under, in, or slightly below recession. Even the economies which are not in recession are flirting with the whole idea of recession. Quarter to quarter, growth is 0.1pc down, 0.8pc up — that is not a very healthy situation.

Secondly, clearly you have a lot of inflationary liquidity caused by stimulus packages etc during the pandemic. You have the liquidity in the market, people have been trying to raise interest rates to mop up the liquidity. If on top of that you get high prices, then it tips that inflationary situation into a really big [arc]. That is the consistency in my argument of between $75/bl and $90/bl.

I talk to the main companies in the world, some of them think, well, it will peak and then come down to $70-75-80/bl. That's neither here nor there. We have to be responsible for what we do.

On behalf of India, my position has always has been that it's a sovereign right to determine how much you want to [produce], but don't be unmindful of the consequences. And it can become a self-fulfilling prophecy that demand will drop because people don't have the capacity to sustain it. My take is that in the last 18 months this has driven some 100mn people into abject poverty. People have gone back to using unconventional or non-conventional firewood for cooking and other purposes.

Therefore, it's not [a question of] how much it affects India. Of course India would be happier if oil prices were $80/bl or below, but India will survive. India has the capacity. We are also a major producing country now, we're also a major exporting country now. But it's a question of what happens in the global economy, which is far from recovered from a number of crises.

What about the idea that higher prices are needed to drive the investment required to sustain production in the longer run?

I have heard this argument many times earlier. Sure, there should be more investment. But when you take 5.2mn b/d out, it is not due to a lack of investment. You've taken it out because you want to do supply-side management.

So, if we talk about India's crude imports, the pattern of crude imports has obviously changed in the last year and a half or so. First we saw rising imports from Russia and then reduced flows from the Middle East. Over the last few months, we have seen something of a reversal on that side. How do you see this evolving going forward?

I think it's a very simple explanation. The Indian government doesn't buy oil. We tender. Our companies, some of them are purely private-sector companies, while some are public sector, but at arms length. They will issue tenders and they will buy oil from wherever they can get it at the cheapest price.

There was a time before February 2022 when our total imports from Russia wouldn't show up in any calculation. They were what you guys call de minimis — 0.2pc. It didn't show up. But you know where the market started going and Russia wanted to export etc. The Russians still produce 11mn b/d and they consume 4mn b/d or so. They still have to sell the 7mn b/d. So, what happens if India is not buying it? And if India starts buying Middle Eastern oil instead, then the price will go up even more. So, it's a complicated situation.

My own sense is that this price sensitivity being a determinant should also be seen in terms of the diversification we have done. Earlier we used to buy from 27 countries — we are buying from 39 countries now. And then there are all manner of people who come in and say, well, we want to sell oil. As long as I'm clear it's not sanctioned oil or something like that, we will buy it.

In terms of the Russian oil payment structure, is that something done in rupees?

There are some discussions on it. I think we've done a rupee payment with the UAE in one consignment, but it is a small percentage — 10pc only.

So, this is not something we are likely to see much more of in the future?

No, no, we would be happy to do it but then it takes two to tango. You need to work on an ecosystem to be able to do that. Somebody asked me today if I see de-dollarisation. I think it's too early for that. I still see the US as the major economy, the world's largest economy that's going to be around for a long time.

A big Saudi delegation came to India after last month's G20 summit. Were there any discussions around the Ratnagiri refinery joint venture with Saudi Aramco?

The discussion is still on but let me give you a perspective on that. Typically, a refinery in India is about 11mn t/yr (220,000 b/d). This predates me as minister. The discussion in Ratnagiri was for a large refinery of 60mn t/yr, which is huge. So, I think you're probably better off in terms of sure ground footing to have three refineries of 20mn t/yr each because there are local issues. Not just in India, even outside, I don't know if anybody has experience in producing and running a refinery of 60mn t/yr. It is very high.

We are keen on it. We are expanding our refining capacity. We're at about 252mn t/yr, we are taking that to 300mn-330mn t/yr and ultimately to 400mn-450mn t/yr. We have very good relations with the Saudis. Very important, not only in the energy sector, but elsewhere. But on individual projects, I would not know. We have a lot of actors who would act on this.

There were issues regarding land ownership around the refinery. Is there anything that could be done from the government side to move things along?

The government will encourage, but I think it's better if you can break it into three 20mn t/yr refineries rather than a 60mn t/yr one. There has been a lot of talk about it.

When you see the Saudis in China, for example, you're seeing a lot of downstream investment going into China. Is this something India is also looking at and thinking you'd like to attract as well?

We are open to all manner of investments. But obviously Indian companies will look at bilateral investments in terms of what is win-win for them. If they're already strong in an area, why would they want outside investment now? Fortunately, for the energy sector, we have a large number of companies who are doing very well. IOC, ONGC, HPCL and BPCL, they are doing well but are also looking to acquire assets outside. So, it is a question of synergies and doing good commercial negotiations.

So focusing on Saudi investment is not something India is necessarily looking to do?

India is looking to do business with everybody. India, we have $16bn of investment in Russia — Russia has $13bn of investment in India. There is a lot of Saudi investment which we welcome to India, from the UAE or all over the world.

Following recent discussions with Iraq, there was an announcement that India would like to increase oil imports beyond the total 1bn bl that it currently takes annually. Is there any reference point for the size of such an increase?

It's all price sensitivity. In India, the government does not do the oil buying. We don't do the target setting either. Typically, we used to import 4mn-5mn b/d roughly for our refining, out of which we equally divided 800,000 b/d between four or five suppliers, and the rest would come from outside. I've seen the Iraqis move up very quickly. I think it's over 1mn b/d [that Iraq supplies to India] now if you look at the total capacity. I see that the supply is increasing. And there is a good reason for all this. This is a tender which is being floated and you decide if you want to respond with a price. Some others may be discussing charging an Asian premium or some extra price etc, obviously the market will move away from that.

So this is more about economics than a political initiative?

There is no politics in this. We are happy with the politics of everyone. You know ultimately it is the price at which you can bring it to the consumer.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
19/03/25

UK study sets out Grangemouth's post-refining future

UK study sets out Grangemouth's post-refining future

Edinburgh, 19 March (Argus) — A government-funded study has identified nine potential low-carbon and renewable options for the Grangemouth site in Scotland following the planned closure of its 150,000 b/d refinery in the second quarter this year. The nine possible projects outlined in the Project Willow study centre around waste, bio-feedstocks and industries supporting the development of offshore wind. They could benefit each other through synergies and create up to 800 direct jobs, but their success "will require significant contributions from both the public and private sector", with an initial £3.5bn ($4.5bn) in capital investments needed, the study said. The £1.5mn report, paid for by the UK and Scottish governments, was commissioned by Grangemouth refinery operator Petroineos, which announced in November 2023 that it was going to close the plant and convert it into a fuel import terminal. The UK and Scottish governments have since set aside £25mn and £200mn for Grangemouth, along with other initiatives such as Scotland's £100mn Falkirk and Grangemouth Growth Deal package. The study's 'waste' pathway comprises a hydrothermal plastic recycling project, a dissolution plastic recycling facility and a bio-refining project relying on bacterial fermentation (ABE). Under the 'bio-feedstock' pathway, the study envisages a second-generation bioethanol plant on Scottish timber feedstock and an anaerobic digestion facility using organic waste to produce biomethane. Second-generation bioethanol refers to ethanol made from non-edible resources such as biomass. This pathway also suggests a sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) plant, with production made from hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA). UK trade union Unite has been supportive of this option , but Petroineos deemed it unviable "under current regulatory conditions". The third pathway — called conduit for offshore wind — is mostly focused on hydrogen. It includes fuel switching, producing jet from e-methanol and methanol as well as producing low-carbon ammonia for the shipping and chemicals industry. The second-generation ethanol plant and the HEFA facility, as well as the e-methanol and e-ammonia projects, would have a longer 2030-40 timeline, against a 2028-30 timeline for the other projects. The projects would benefit from existing infrastructure such as Grangemouth's port, which includes container, bulk and liquid fuel terminals. "There are also opportunities to reuse existing tank storage, ethanol facilities, and other ancillary assets at the site," the study said. Unite has criticised the study's project timelines, pointing out most would start years after the refinery had closed, by which time jobs would have been lost. Many of the projects "could be fast tracked and implemented now", including converting the refinery to SAF production, the union said. "Project Willow was created by Petroineos as a fig leaf to justify its act of industrial vandalism of shutting the refinery and axing jobs. It asked the wrong questions and then failed to provide the answers that Grangemouth refinery workers need," Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said. "There are projects like SAF production which can be swiftly enacted to protect jobs and those opportunities must not be lost. This would pave the way for the UK to become a world leader in green aviation." By Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Dangote suspends refined product sales in naira


19/03/25
News
19/03/25

Dangote suspends refined product sales in naira

London, 19 March (Argus) — Nigeria's independently-owned 650,000 b/d Dangote refinery has "temporarily halted" the sale of petroleum products in the country's naira currency, according to a statement seen by Argus today. The decision was taken to "avoid a mismatch between our sales proceeds and our crude oil purchase obligations, which are currently denominated in US dollars", the statement read. Dangote said refined product sales in naira "have exceeded the value of naira-denominated crude" the refinery has received, and it will resume naria-denominated product sales as soon as it receives a naira-denominated crude cargo. Nigeria's state-owned NNPC recently said it is in negotiations with Dangote refinery about extending a local currency crude sales arrangement. By George Maher-Bonnett Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Vitol's Malaysian storage to take third bitumen cargo


19/03/25
News
19/03/25

Vitol's Malaysian storage to take third bitumen cargo

Mumbai, 19 March (Argus) — Global energy trading firm Vitol will take a third bitumen shipment from Singapore for its recently built 50,000-70,000t storage facility in Malaysia's Tanjung Bin, vessel tracking data showed. The cargo aboard the 5,869 deadweight tonne (dwt) Erica 10 vessel was loaded from Singapore Refining's terminal in Jurong, Singapore over 16-17 March and is scheduled to discharge in Tanjung Bin over 20-21 March, Kpler and Vortexa data showed. The same vessel carried the firm's second cargo the previous week, while the first shipment was loaded aboard the 4,020dwt Sidra Qatar vessel at the end of January from ExxonMobil's terminal in Singapore and was discharged into Tanjung Bin in early February, the data showed. The trading firm is likely importing cargoes into its storage facility to stock up, but it cannot be determined if it would start exporting from Tanjung Bin in the near term. By Sathya Narayanan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

State of emergency after Nigeria pipeline attack:Update


18/03/25
News
18/03/25

State of emergency after Nigeria pipeline attack:Update

Updates with state of emergency declared London, 18 March (Argus) — The Nigerian government has declared a state of emergency in Rivers State, after an apparent attack on the Trans-Niger Pipeline (TNP) halted crude movements to Nigeria's Bonny Light export terminal. A fire occurred on the pipeline at the border of the Kpor and Bodo communities, and the pipeline's management has shut down the affected section, the Rivers State police said. Operator Renaissance Africa said it is responding to an incident. The 180,000 b/d, 60km TNP carries crude to the Bonny terminal, from where the Bonny Light grade is exported. TNP was operated until 14 March by Shell subsidiary SPDC . The pipeline has been the target of repeated oil theft, vandalism and sabotage in the past, and Shell shut the TNP entirely between April and October 2022. Nigerian President Bola Tinubu today said the resumption of "disturbing incidents" had happened "without the [state] governor taking any action to curtail them". Tinubu suspended the Rivers State governor and his deputy and said the region will be under federal control, effective immediately. It is unclear what if any effect this will have on the region's oil production, a source within state-owned oil firm NNPC told Argus . But it appears the pipeline attack has halted loadings at the Bonny terminal. The Almi Voyager was the most recent tanker to load there, with around 550,000 bl of crude on 14 March. Loading operations are seemingly halted as the pumping of 475,000 bl to NNPC's 210,000 b/d Port Harcourt refinery was the next scheduled operation before the explosion. Market sources said they are monitoring the situation and awaiting a possible declaration of force majeure by Renaissance Africa. Sources added that loading operations at the export terminal were already running up to two weeks behind schedule. By Elena Mataro, Adebiyi Olusolape and Sanjana Shivdas Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Dangote expands crude sourcing with Brazilian supplies


18/03/25
News
18/03/25

Dangote expands crude sourcing with Brazilian supplies

London, 18 March (Argus) — Nigeria's 650,000 b/d Dangote refinery has tapped the Brazilian crude market for the first time as it expands its global reach with a diversified crude slate and further reduces dependency on domestic grades. Sources told Argus Dangote bought a 1mn bl shipment of medium sweet Buzios this week for delivery between 25 March–5 April, from trading firm Vitol. The equity producer of the Buzios shipment was said by sources to be China's CNOOC. Details on price levels were kept under wraps. Brazilian grades typically trade as a differential to North Sea Dated in the month of delivery. European buyers took less Brazilian supply for delivery in April than in March, as refiners turned to competitively priced Mediterranean grades, according to traders. Buzios for April delivery to Europe was priced at around a $2/bl premium to the average of Dated in the month of delivery. Key medium sweet Nigerian grades Forcados and Escravos were assessed on a fob basis at a $1.70/bl and a $1.50/bl premium to Dated, respectively, with shipping costs yet to be added. This makes Brazilian supplies more appealing despite a much longer voyage. Around 30pc of Buzios exports, or 96,000 b/d, found an outlet in China in 2024, according to data from Vortexa, while 22pc went to Spain and 14pc to Portugal. Dangote's purchase of Buzios comes as the refinery looks to widen its crude procurement strategy and reduce dependency on supplies from Nigeria. The refinery could be considering other west African grades, sources with knowledge of the matter said. Refinery sources told Argus in January that Dangote will source at least 50pc of its crude needs on the import market, and it is building eight storage tanks to facilitate this. The tanks will add 6.3mn bl of storage capacity to around 12mn bl in place, serving as a buffer for the additional shipping times compared to domestic grades. Dangote has of late diversified its crude sources to include a broad array of regions. Last week it bought a first cargo of Equatorial Guinea's medium sweet Ceiba , for loading over 12-13 April from BP, after an earlier purchase of Algeria's light sweet Saharan Blend from trading firm Glencore arriving over 15-20 March. Dangote recently bought 2mn bl of US light sweet WTI for arrival over 10-20 April from Glencore, sources said. On purchases closer to home, the refinery has bought 950,000 bl cargoes of April-loading Amenam, Yoho, Qua Iboe and Egina from state-owned NNPC. This is unconfirmed. By Sanjana Shivdas and Lina Bulyk Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more