Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Energy security under threat as Asia tensions rise

  • Market: Crude oil, Natural gas, Oil products
  • 04/08/21

How China's disputes with its regional rivals and the US pan out will dictate the future of global energy trade, writes Kevin Foster

A crude cargo shipped from the Mideast Gulf to northeast Asia passes through the most dynamic — and potentially unstable — part of the globe. Tankers leaving the Gulf head south of Gwadar port in Pakistan's unstable Balochistan province, the terminus of the troubled China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, before passing by major importer India and Myanmar (Burma), where civil unrest is threatening China's oil pipeline links to the Indian Ocean. Transiting the narrow, pirate-ridden strait of Malacca, cargoes then move north through the contested waters of the South China Sea and the Taiwan strait to discharge at ports in China, Japan or South Korea, in the shadow of North Korea's nuclear weapons.

Around 9mn b/d of crude is shipped every day from the world's biggest oil producing region to the top importer, passing by countries that account for almost half of global crude import demand, but which are also home to rising nationalism, festering territorial conflicts and intensifying superpower competition between the US and China for primacy in Asia. What is the risk of one of these flashpoints igniting a wider conflict — and what would it mean for energy trade and demand if it did?

China rising

Local conflicts notwithstanding, the common theme driving regional instability is China's attempt to carve out a place in the world commensurate with its economic heft. The world's second-largest economy and top energy importer is operating within global economic and political structures shaped by the US after World War 2, when China was mired in civil war. And as China moves towards regaining the top spot in the global economy that it occupied for much of the past 1,000 years, it is increasingly attempting to shape those structures to its own benefit.

"China has gone through the stages of standing up and getting rich and is now advancing to the stage of becoming strong," says Yan Xuetong, dean of the institute of international relations at the country's Tsinghua University. Beijing's efforts to shift the regional balance of power in its favour are seen nowhere more clearly than in the South China Sea, where the risks of a conflict over energy resources or control of sea lanes have intensified sharply in recent years (see map).

China claims sovereignty over large parts of the sea, including in areas also claimed by a total of six other littoral nations. Naval clashes over disputed oil and gas reserves, tensions over US "freedom of navigation" operations to challenge what Washington calls "unlawful" maritime claims, and rival claimants' construction of military bases on contested islands together led US secretary of state Tony Blinken to say in July that "nowhere is the rules-based order under greater threat than in the South China Sea".

Beijing denies that freedom of navigation is threatened and claims to have recently driven off a US warship that was "violating its sovereignty" by passing near disputed territory. Any military clash between US and Chinese vessels could have major repercussions for energy flows — about 10mn b/d of crude and 100mn t/yr of LNG pass through the South China Sea, along with 30pc of global seaborne trade. Meanwhile, the sea's estimated energy resources of up to 11bn bl of oil and 190 trillion ft³ (5.4 trillion m³) of gas lie largely undeveloped as a result.

Dire straits

A potentially bigger flashpoint lies to the north, in Taiwan. On any given day, around 7mn bl of crude passes along Taiwan's east and west coasts, while Chinese and Taiwanese naval and air forces face off across the Taiwan strait. Beijing, which sees Taiwan as an "inalienable part of China", has stepped up its military activity in the strait since the 2016 election of Taiwanese president Tsai Ing-wen, who opposes unification with the mainland. In July, Chinese president Xi Jinping promised a "complete reunification" with Taiwan during a major speech marking the centenary of the Chinese Communist Party, adding to Beijing's increasingly aggressive rhetoric. Foreign forces bullying China will "smash their heads bloody" against a great wall of steel built by the Chinese people, Xi says.

China could invade Taiwan within the next six years, the US' top military commander in Asia-Pacific, admiral Philip Davidson, warned a US Senate committee this year. Other observers play down the risks of armed conflict, arguing that the likely international condemnation — and potential for economic sanctions against Beijing — could derail China's carefully managed economic rise and lead to upheaval in oil imports.

The US could respond to any Chinese blockade of Taiwan with a counter-blockade of its own, including by "interfering… in the Indo-Pacific region and the [Mideast Gulf] with a lot of Chinese access to oil and other raw materials", US research group Brookings senior fellow Michael O'Hanlon told think-tank the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in July.

A new defence bill moving through the US Congress commits the country's armed forces to maintaining the ability to deny a "fait accompli" against Taiwan, in an attempt to deter China from using military force — suggesting tensions will only rise further in the short term. And should China decide to take Taiwan by force, the risks of a wider conflict appear to be increasing. Japan's deputy prime minister, Taro Aso, recently hinted that Tokyo might come to Taiwan's aid in the event of an attack — remarks that Beijing described as "extremely wrong and dangerous".

Energy vulnerability

Energy importers in the region are trying to manage the rising risks by diversifying their supply sources, although with limited success. China is increasingly sensitive to the risks that stem from its heavy oil and gas import dependence. Its latest five-year plan includes a section on energy security for the first time, and refers to the importance of securing "critical chokepoints" along import routes.

Beijing has sought to reduce its reliance on seaborne imports through a huge programme to build or expand its overland oil and gas pipeline links with Russia, central Asia and Myanmar. Cross-border pipelines supplied only about 7pc of China's crude imports last year. And the pipelines bring their own security risks.

Beijing has strengthened its ties with Moscow and many of its central Asian neighbours in recent years, helped in part by its booming energy trade, as well as by investments under its huge Belt and Road Initiative. But turmoil in Myanmar following this year's military coup threatens the security of China's Burma Road pipelines, which carried 200,000 b/d of Mideast Gulf crude to China last year. And Beijing's ambitions to further bypass the strait of Malacca by securing access to Pakistan's Indian Ocean port of Gwadar have been plagued by problems, including a militant attack in July that killed nine Chinese workers.

Other regional importers have even fewer alternatives to seaborne imports. South Korea — where imports cover more than 90pc of energy and natural resource needs — has focused on strengthening energy ties with exporters such as the US and countries in the Middle East, its foreign ministry says. India is scrambling to diversify oil imports and boost domestic supplies, with minimal success. The increased tension in the Taiwan strait, along with US-China rivalry in the South China Sea, has also highlighted the risks to energy security in Japan, which relied on Middle East suppliers for 92pc of its 2.5mn b/d of crude imports last year (see table). Policy advisers to Japanese premier Yoshihide Suga are urging the government to look for alternatives to the main import routes through the strait of Malacca and the South and East China seas.

Pivot points

Big energy importers have another option to reduce risk — cutting oil and gas imports altogether through a transition to cleaner energy sources. Japan's total fuel demand could fall by 50pc by 2040, according to the country's biggest refiner, Eneos, while oil's share of China's energy mix could drop to as low as 3pc by 2050, from 18pc now, as part of the government's commitment to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, according to Tsinghua University estimates.

The energy transition will not eliminate security risks entirely, with the emergence of an international market for hydrogen hinting at one potential future for global commodity trade. But China's dominant position in global rare earth supplies provides a sharp contrast to its dependence on imported crude and gas, while the localised nature of renewables such as solar and wind could also reshape supply dynamics.

Looming over Asia-Pacific is the US, in the role of guarantor of stability and freedom of sea lanes that it has played since 1945. But Washington has overstretched its military power after two decades of conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan, and its commitment to safeguarding its faraway allies looks shakier after four years of "America First" policies under former president Donald Trump.

"We have historically a strong position in Asia [but] that position has slipped and we are at risk," White House Indo-Pacific co-ordinator Kurt Campbell says. "China wants to reshape the operating system of Asia." Trump's successor Joe Biden is acting to repair damaged bilateral relationships with Asian allies such as Japan and South Korea to promote a multilateral front against China, as his administration embraces as tough a line towards Beijing as Trump's did.

Despite the change in rhetoric under Biden, questions remain about US engagement in Asia. Former president Barack Obama's "pivot to Asia" was stalled by a competing US security focus on Russia and the Middle East, creating the perception of a growing security vacuum. Biden is keen to avoid the same trap by seeking an equilibrium in relations with Russia and ending the US' combat role in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The growth in trade between the US and China — notwithstanding periods of turmoil under Trump — as well as within Asia-Pacific itself, still holds out hope that economic integration will outweigh political rivalries. The shale boom resulted in the US strengthening its energy trade with east Asia over the past decade — even as political relations grew increasingly uncertain — and US oil and gas exports through the Panama Canal bypass many of the flashpoints that threaten Asia-Pacific trade with the Mideast Gulf. China has imported more than 500,000 b/d of US crude in the past 12 months. And US-China trade totalled almost $560bn in 2020, up by more than 20pc from 10 years earlier.

Conscious decoupling

But history has another warning. While the rise of China could herald the end of the post-1945 global political system, some observers see a more worrying analogy for modern-day Asia-Pacific in the build-up to World War 1. China's challenge to US primacy echoes the dynamics between Germany and Great Britain that sparked that conflict, and trade between those countries was also on the rise ahead of the start of hostilities.

Whether a similar disaster can be avoided a century later in east Asia could become the most important question for global energy trade. And Washington's policies to decouple its economy from that of China — accelerating as US actions to limit investment flows to China find a counterpart in Beijing's move to cut off access to western finance for its own technology sector — may already be eroding the stabilising effect of financial and economic interdependence.

South China Sea energy trade exposure, 2020
ToFrom
Crude '000 b/d*
Middle EastW AfricaEuropeS America
China5,1221,4323751,436
Japan2,218103244
Singapore554620106
Other3,60031958104
Natural gas (as LNG) bn m³
Middle EastAfricaIndonesiaMalaysia
China13.04.97.48.3
Japan14.62.03.014.8
South Korea18.71.43.76.7
Taiwan7.30.71.61.0
Other8.01.90.71.9
*includes condensates

South China Sea territorial claims

China's estimated seaborne oil trade

China-Myanmar crude infrastructure

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
03/04/25

Funding cuts could delay US river lock renovations

Funding cuts could delay US river lock renovations

Houston, 3 April (Argus) — The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) will have to choose between various lock reconstruction and waterway projects for its annual construction plan after its funding was cut earlier this year. Last year Congress allowed the Corps to use $800mn from unspent infrastructure funds for other waterways projects. But when Congress passed a continuing resolutions for this year's budget they effectively removed that $800mn from what was a $2.6bn annual budget for lock reconstruction and waterways projects. This means a construction plan that must be sent to Congress by 14 May can only include $1.8bn in spending. No specific projects were allocated funding by Congress, allowing the Corps the final say on what projects it pursues under the new budget. River industry trade group Waterways Council said its top priority is for the Corps to provide a combined $205mn for work at the Montgomery lock in Pennsylvania on the Ohio River and Chickamauga lock in Tennesee on the Tennessee River since they are the nearest to completion and could become more expensive if further delayed. There are seven active navigation construction projects expected to take precedent, including the following: the Chickamauga and Kentucky Locks on the Tennessee River; Locks 2-4 on the Monongahela River; the Three Rivers project on the Arkansas River; the LaGrange Lock and Lock 25 on the Illinois River; and the Montgomery Lock on the Ohio River. There are three other locks in Texas, Pennsylvania and Illinois that are in the active design phase (see map) . By Meghan Yoyotte Corps active construction projects 2025 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Mexico, Canada sidestep latest Trump tariffs: Update


03/04/25
News
03/04/25

Mexico, Canada sidestep latest Trump tariffs: Update

Adds Canada reaction Mexico City, 3 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's sweeping tariff measures largely spared Mexico and Canada from additional penalties, as the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA) will continue to exempt most commerce, including Mexico's energy exports. According to Trump's tariff announcement on Wednesday , all foreign imports into the US will be subject to a minimum 10pc tax starting on 5 April, with levels as high as 34pc for China and 20pc for the EU. Mexico and Canada are the US' closest trading partners and have seen tariffs imposed and then postponed several times this year, but remained mostly exempt from Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs. Energy and "certain minerals that are not available in the US" imported from all other countries also will be exempt from the tariffs. Trump also did not reimpose punitive tariffs on energy and other imports from Canada and Mexico. All products covered by the USMCA, which include energy commodities, are exempt as well. Yet steel and aluminum, cars, trucks and auto parts from Mexico and Canada remain subject to separate tariffs. Steel and aluminum imports are subject to 25pc, in effect since 12 March. The 25pc tariff on all imported cars and trucks will go into effect on Thursday, whereas a 25pc tax on auto parts will go into effect on 3 May. Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum this morning emphasized the "good relationship" and "mutual respect" between Mexico and the US, which she said was key to Trump's decision to prioritize the USMCA over potential further tariffs on Mexican imports. "So far, we have managed to reach a relatively more privileged position when it comes to these tariffs," Sheinbaum said. "Many of our industries are now exempt from tariffs. We aim to reach a better position regarding steel, aluminum and auto parts exports, too." The Mexican peso strengthened by 1.5pc against the US dollar in the wake of the tariff announcement, to Ps19.96/$1 by late morning on Thursday from Ps20.25/$1 on Wednesday. Mexico has not placed any tariffs on imports from the US, which may have eliminated the need for the US to reciprocate with tariffs. "In contrast to what will apply to 185 global economies, Mexico remains exempt from reciprocal tariffs," Mexico's economy minister Marcelo Ebrard said. Mexico exported 500,000 b/d of crude to the US last year, making the US by far the most important export market for the nation's commodity. Mexico also imports the majority of its motor fuels and LPG from the US. If US won't lead, Canada will: Carney To the north, Canada's prime minister says the US' latest trade actions will "rupture" the global economy. "The global economy is fundamentally different today than it was yesterday," said prime minister Mark Carney on Thursday while announcing retaliatory tariffs on auto imports from the US. Canada is matching the US with 25pc tariffs on all vehicles imported from the US that are not compliant with the USMCA, referred to as CUSMA in Canada. But unlike the US tariffs, which took effect Thursday, Canada's will not include auto parts. Automaker Stellantis has informed Unifor Local 444 that it is shutting down the Windsor Assembly Plant in Ontario for two weeks starting on 7 April, with the primary driver being Trump's tariffs. The closure will affect 3,600 workers. Trump on 2 April unveiled a chart of dozens of countries the US is targeting with new tariffs, but that lengthy list may also represent opportunity for Canada and Mexico, who have already been dealing with US trade action. "The world is waking up today to a reality that Canada has been living with for months," Canadian Chamber of Commerce president Candace Laing said, a reality which Carney views as an opportunity for his country. "Canada is ready to take a leadership role in building a coalition of like-minded countries who share our values," said Carney. "If the United States no longer wants to lead, Canada will." By Cas Biekmann and Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

CMA CGM LNG bunker demand up 78pc in 2024


03/04/25
News
03/04/25

CMA CGM LNG bunker demand up 78pc in 2024

New York, 3 April (Argus) — France-based shipping company CMA CGM increased its consumption of LNG for bunkering by 78pc in 2024 compared with 2023 as part of its efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The company consumed a total of 9.2mn tonnes (t) of marine fuel last year. LNG accounted for 10pc of total demand, or 962,200t of very low sulphur fuel oil equivalent (VLSFOe) up from 539,200t VLSFOe, or 7pc, in 2023. CMA CGM attributed the overall rise in marine fuel consumption to disruptions in the Red Sea, where geopolitical tensions forced its vessels to reroute around Africa via the Cape of Good Hope. The company has established LNG bunker supply partnerships with TotalEnergies and Shell, securing fuel at key ports including Singapore, Rotterdam in the Netherlands, Fos-sur-Mer in France, and Shanghai in China. CMA CGM has also invested in French firm Waga Energy, which produces biomethane from landfill gas. The company acknowledges methane slip — unburned methane emissions during combustion — is a key challenge with LNG. To mitigate this, CMA CGM has outfitted select vessels with systems that recirculate and combust leaked gas. It is also implementing high-pressure gas injection and is modifying engine intake valves to ensure more complete combustion. Looking ahead, CMA CGM plans to expand its dual-fuel fleet significantly by 2029. It will add 153 such vessels, including 129 that can run on LNG and 24 powered on methanol. In addition to LNG and methanol, CMA CGM is increasing its use of shore power. The number of its vessels equipped with shore-side electric power connections rose to 116 in 2024, representing 38pc of its owned fleet, up from 67 vessels (26pc) in 2023. CMA CGM also utilizes biofuels for bunkering, though demand declined to 50,900t in 2024, from 76,800t in 2023 and 99,800t in 2022, representing just 1pc of its total marine fuel use. In northwest Europe, LNG carried a $144/t premium over VLSFO, in March, with VLSFO averaging $485/t, according to Argus data. Bio-LNG and B30 biofuel there were priced at premiums of $396/t and $338/t, respectively. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Opec+ eight to speed up unwinding cuts from May: Update


03/04/25
News
03/04/25

Opec+ eight to speed up unwinding cuts from May: Update

Adds details throughout Dubai, 3 April (Argus) — A core group of eight Opec+ crude producers, in a surprise move, today agreed to speed up plans to gradually unwind 2.2mn b/d of production cuts by increasing their collective output target for May by 411,000 b/d — three times the rise originally planned. "In view of the continuing healthy market fundamentals and the positive market outlook… the eight participating countries will implement a production adjustment of 411,000 b/d, equivalent to three monthly increments, in May 2025," the group said. Front month Ice Brent futures fell by around $1/bl to $70.50/bl in response to the news, and slipped further to below $70/bl later before recovering slightly. The eight countries ꟷ Saudi Arabia, Russia, the UAE, Kuwait, Iraq, Algeria, Oman and Kazakhstan ꟷ last month decided to proceed with a plan to begin gradually unwinding the 2.2mn b/d of production cuts from April over 18 months. The original plan was to see their combined output target rise by 137,000 b/d on a monthly basis until September 2026. Although it is unclear whether the group will revert back to 137,000 b/d increments after May, this change should, theoretically, mean that the eight will return the last of the 2.2mn b/d in July 2026, rather than September. But the volume of oil that actually returns to the market each month will probably be less than the monthly target increases as all of the eight countries, bar Algeria, have past overproduction which they have committed to compensating for over the months ahead. The group said today that the decision to raise output targets by 411,000 b/d for May, versus 137,000 b/d, would also "provide an opportunity for the participating countries to accelerate their compensation". The seven countries with overproduction to compensate for submitted their updated plans to the Opec secretariat two weeks ago, outlining how they plan to deliver that compensation. It is unclear whether today's decision has rendered those plans moot, but it should allow for at least some of the countries to clear more of that they owe next month. Full implementation of the compensation cuts has become increasingly important for the group as it looks to balance market expectations with internal group dynamics. Frustration has built up among some members of the group towards the likes of Iraq and Kazakhstan which have regularly flouted their quotas. What is most surprising about the move is timing, coming the day after US President Donald Trump announced sweeping new global tariffs on a range of imports. That triggered an immediate sell-off in oil futures and stock markets over fears of deteriorating demand in an escalating trade war. But the tariff announcements did not appear to be at the forefront of Opec+ eight minds, with one delegate expressing scepticism that the Trump administration's tariffs were here to stay. The impact is unlikely to be as severe as many fear, they said. Instead, the decision primarily factored in the pick up in oil demand that typically comes with the start of the summer in the northern hemisphere. "A big part of this 411,000 b/d will go to meet that additional demand," one delegate said. Additionally, the move should also enhance internal group dynamics, given the frustration that had been building among some in the group prior to last month's decision to start the unwinding in April, while at the same time getting the thumbs up from the US president who had already called on Opec and its allies to "bring down the cost of oil," something it could only achieve by raising output. Trump has said that he will be visiting Saudi Arabia sometime in May, when the group of eight countries begins to accelerate the return of those barrels. By Bachar Halabi and Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump to 'stand firm' on tariffs as markets crash


03/04/25
News
03/04/25

Trump to 'stand firm' on tariffs as markets crash

Washington, 3 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump does not intend to back down from his plan for sweeping import tariffs that have already caused a sell-off in global equity markets and some commodities, administration officials say. The tariffs — which will start at 10pc for most imports on 5 April before steeper country-specific tariffs take effect on 9 April, with exceptions for some energy and mineral imports — have caused key stock indexes to drop by as much as 5pc, with even larger declines in crude futures, as investors brace for lower growth and a higher chance of a recession. Trump earlier today defended the tariffs, as he prepared to leave the White House for a dinner tonight at a golf tournament at one of his resorts in Florida. "THE OPERATION IS OVER! THE PATIENT LIVED, AND IS HEALING," Trump wrote in a social media post before major stock markets opened. Trump's cabinet has downplayed the short-term price effect of the tariffs, which they say will boost economic growth in the US and cause a resurgence in domestic manufacturing. US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick said he does not think there is "any chance" that Trump will rescind the tariffs, and said Trump will only begin to work on new trade deals once a country has "really, really changed their ways" on trade practices. "Trump is going to stand firm because he is reordering global trade," Lutnick said today in an interview with CNN. "Make no mistake about it, America has been exploited, and he is done allowing America to be exploited." Other administration officials have suggested a greater potential for lower tariffs in the near-term. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent has encouraged world leaders to "take a deep breath" and not to "panic" because the tariff rates that Trump announced were a "ceiling" that might come down, so long as there was no retaliation. "Don't immediately retaliate, let's see where this goes, because if you retaliate, that's how we get escalation," Bessent said on 2 April during interview on Fox News. The tariffs have caused bipartisan backlash on Capitol Hill, but so far legislative action has been symbolic and unlikely to become law. The US Senate, in a bipartisan vote on 2 April, approved a joint resolution that would end the justification Trump has used to put tariffs on Canada. US senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) introduced a bill today to eliminate most new presidential tariffs after 60 days without approval by the US Congress. Democrats say the tariffs will force consumers to pay far more on everyday goods, with revenue offsetting Republican plans to provide more than $5 trillion in tax cuts. "Donald Trump is using tariffs in the dumbest way imaginable. In fact, Donald Trump slapped tariffs on penguins and not on Putin," US Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) said today, in reference to Trump's decision to put a 10pc tariff on an island populated only with penguins. Trump has claimed his country-specific tariffs are "reciprocal" even though they have no relation to the tariffs each country charges on US imports. Instead, Trump's tariffs were calculated based on a universal equation that is set at half of the country's trade deficit with the US, divided by the country's imports from the US, with a minimum tariff rate of 10pc. US major trading partners are preparing for retaliatory tariffs. Canada's prime minister Mark Carney said he would respond to Trump's tariffs on automobiles, which took effect today, by "matching the US approach" and imposing a 25pc tariff on auto imports that do not comply with the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement. China said it was preparing unspecified countermeasures to US tariffs that would be set at 54pc. Trump's cabinet today dismissed the market reaction to the tariffs. Stock markets are going through a "short-term adjustment" but the tariffs will ultimately result in more growth and additional investments, US Small Business Administration administrator Kelly Loeffler said today in an interview on Fox News "The gravy train is over for the globalist elites," said Loeffler, who previously was a top executive at US exchange operator ICE. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more