Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Energy security under threat as Asia tensions rise

  • Market: Crude oil, Natural gas, Oil products
  • 04/08/21

How China's disputes with its regional rivals and the US pan out will dictate the future of global energy trade, writes Kevin Foster

A crude cargo shipped from the Mideast Gulf to northeast Asia passes through the most dynamic — and potentially unstable — part of the globe. Tankers leaving the Gulf head south of Gwadar port in Pakistan's unstable Balochistan province, the terminus of the troubled China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, before passing by major importer India and Myanmar (Burma), where civil unrest is threatening China's oil pipeline links to the Indian Ocean. Transiting the narrow, pirate-ridden strait of Malacca, cargoes then move north through the contested waters of the South China Sea and the Taiwan strait to discharge at ports in China, Japan or South Korea, in the shadow of North Korea's nuclear weapons.

Around 9mn b/d of crude is shipped every day from the world's biggest oil producing region to the top importer, passing by countries that account for almost half of global crude import demand, but which are also home to rising nationalism, festering territorial conflicts and intensifying superpower competition between the US and China for primacy in Asia. What is the risk of one of these flashpoints igniting a wider conflict — and what would it mean for energy trade and demand if it did?

China rising

Local conflicts notwithstanding, the common theme driving regional instability is China's attempt to carve out a place in the world commensurate with its economic heft. The world's second-largest economy and top energy importer is operating within global economic and political structures shaped by the US after World War 2, when China was mired in civil war. And as China moves towards regaining the top spot in the global economy that it occupied for much of the past 1,000 years, it is increasingly attempting to shape those structures to its own benefit.

"China has gone through the stages of standing up and getting rich and is now advancing to the stage of becoming strong," says Yan Xuetong, dean of the institute of international relations at the country's Tsinghua University. Beijing's efforts to shift the regional balance of power in its favour are seen nowhere more clearly than in the South China Sea, where the risks of a conflict over energy resources or control of sea lanes have intensified sharply in recent years (see map).

China claims sovereignty over large parts of the sea, including in areas also claimed by a total of six other littoral nations. Naval clashes over disputed oil and gas reserves, tensions over US "freedom of navigation" operations to challenge what Washington calls "unlawful" maritime claims, and rival claimants' construction of military bases on contested islands together led US secretary of state Tony Blinken to say in July that "nowhere is the rules-based order under greater threat than in the South China Sea".

Beijing denies that freedom of navigation is threatened and claims to have recently driven off a US warship that was "violating its sovereignty" by passing near disputed territory. Any military clash between US and Chinese vessels could have major repercussions for energy flows — about 10mn b/d of crude and 100mn t/yr of LNG pass through the South China Sea, along with 30pc of global seaborne trade. Meanwhile, the sea's estimated energy resources of up to 11bn bl of oil and 190 trillion ft³ (5.4 trillion m³) of gas lie largely undeveloped as a result.

Dire straits

A potentially bigger flashpoint lies to the north, in Taiwan. On any given day, around 7mn bl of crude passes along Taiwan's east and west coasts, while Chinese and Taiwanese naval and air forces face off across the Taiwan strait. Beijing, which sees Taiwan as an "inalienable part of China", has stepped up its military activity in the strait since the 2016 election of Taiwanese president Tsai Ing-wen, who opposes unification with the mainland. In July, Chinese president Xi Jinping promised a "complete reunification" with Taiwan during a major speech marking the centenary of the Chinese Communist Party, adding to Beijing's increasingly aggressive rhetoric. Foreign forces bullying China will "smash their heads bloody" against a great wall of steel built by the Chinese people, Xi says.

China could invade Taiwan within the next six years, the US' top military commander in Asia-Pacific, admiral Philip Davidson, warned a US Senate committee this year. Other observers play down the risks of armed conflict, arguing that the likely international condemnation — and potential for economic sanctions against Beijing — could derail China's carefully managed economic rise and lead to upheaval in oil imports.

The US could respond to any Chinese blockade of Taiwan with a counter-blockade of its own, including by "interfering… in the Indo-Pacific region and the [Mideast Gulf] with a lot of Chinese access to oil and other raw materials", US research group Brookings senior fellow Michael O'Hanlon told think-tank the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in July.

A new defence bill moving through the US Congress commits the country's armed forces to maintaining the ability to deny a "fait accompli" against Taiwan, in an attempt to deter China from using military force — suggesting tensions will only rise further in the short term. And should China decide to take Taiwan by force, the risks of a wider conflict appear to be increasing. Japan's deputy prime minister, Taro Aso, recently hinted that Tokyo might come to Taiwan's aid in the event of an attack — remarks that Beijing described as "extremely wrong and dangerous".

Energy vulnerability

Energy importers in the region are trying to manage the rising risks by diversifying their supply sources, although with limited success. China is increasingly sensitive to the risks that stem from its heavy oil and gas import dependence. Its latest five-year plan includes a section on energy security for the first time, and refers to the importance of securing "critical chokepoints" along import routes.

Beijing has sought to reduce its reliance on seaborne imports through a huge programme to build or expand its overland oil and gas pipeline links with Russia, central Asia and Myanmar. Cross-border pipelines supplied only about 7pc of China's crude imports last year. And the pipelines bring their own security risks.

Beijing has strengthened its ties with Moscow and many of its central Asian neighbours in recent years, helped in part by its booming energy trade, as well as by investments under its huge Belt and Road Initiative. But turmoil in Myanmar following this year's military coup threatens the security of China's Burma Road pipelines, which carried 200,000 b/d of Mideast Gulf crude to China last year. And Beijing's ambitions to further bypass the strait of Malacca by securing access to Pakistan's Indian Ocean port of Gwadar have been plagued by problems, including a militant attack in July that killed nine Chinese workers.

Other regional importers have even fewer alternatives to seaborne imports. South Korea — where imports cover more than 90pc of energy and natural resource needs — has focused on strengthening energy ties with exporters such as the US and countries in the Middle East, its foreign ministry says. India is scrambling to diversify oil imports and boost domestic supplies, with minimal success. The increased tension in the Taiwan strait, along with US-China rivalry in the South China Sea, has also highlighted the risks to energy security in Japan, which relied on Middle East suppliers for 92pc of its 2.5mn b/d of crude imports last year (see table). Policy advisers to Japanese premier Yoshihide Suga are urging the government to look for alternatives to the main import routes through the strait of Malacca and the South and East China seas.

Pivot points

Big energy importers have another option to reduce risk — cutting oil and gas imports altogether through a transition to cleaner energy sources. Japan's total fuel demand could fall by 50pc by 2040, according to the country's biggest refiner, Eneos, while oil's share of China's energy mix could drop to as low as 3pc by 2050, from 18pc now, as part of the government's commitment to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, according to Tsinghua University estimates.

The energy transition will not eliminate security risks entirely, with the emergence of an international market for hydrogen hinting at one potential future for global commodity trade. But China's dominant position in global rare earth supplies provides a sharp contrast to its dependence on imported crude and gas, while the localised nature of renewables such as solar and wind could also reshape supply dynamics.

Looming over Asia-Pacific is the US, in the role of guarantor of stability and freedom of sea lanes that it has played since 1945. But Washington has overstretched its military power after two decades of conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan, and its commitment to safeguarding its faraway allies looks shakier after four years of "America First" policies under former president Donald Trump.

"We have historically a strong position in Asia [but] that position has slipped and we are at risk," White House Indo-Pacific co-ordinator Kurt Campbell says. "China wants to reshape the operating system of Asia." Trump's successor Joe Biden is acting to repair damaged bilateral relationships with Asian allies such as Japan and South Korea to promote a multilateral front against China, as his administration embraces as tough a line towards Beijing as Trump's did.

Despite the change in rhetoric under Biden, questions remain about US engagement in Asia. Former president Barack Obama's "pivot to Asia" was stalled by a competing US security focus on Russia and the Middle East, creating the perception of a growing security vacuum. Biden is keen to avoid the same trap by seeking an equilibrium in relations with Russia and ending the US' combat role in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The growth in trade between the US and China — notwithstanding periods of turmoil under Trump — as well as within Asia-Pacific itself, still holds out hope that economic integration will outweigh political rivalries. The shale boom resulted in the US strengthening its energy trade with east Asia over the past decade — even as political relations grew increasingly uncertain — and US oil and gas exports through the Panama Canal bypass many of the flashpoints that threaten Asia-Pacific trade with the Mideast Gulf. China has imported more than 500,000 b/d of US crude in the past 12 months. And US-China trade totalled almost $560bn in 2020, up by more than 20pc from 10 years earlier.

Conscious decoupling

But history has another warning. While the rise of China could herald the end of the post-1945 global political system, some observers see a more worrying analogy for modern-day Asia-Pacific in the build-up to World War 1. China's challenge to US primacy echoes the dynamics between Germany and Great Britain that sparked that conflict, and trade between those countries was also on the rise ahead of the start of hostilities.

Whether a similar disaster can be avoided a century later in east Asia could become the most important question for global energy trade. And Washington's policies to decouple its economy from that of China — accelerating as US actions to limit investment flows to China find a counterpart in Beijing's move to cut off access to western finance for its own technology sector — may already be eroding the stabilising effect of financial and economic interdependence.

South China Sea energy trade exposure, 2020
ToFrom
Crude '000 b/d*
Middle EastW AfricaEuropeS America
China5,1221,4323751,436
Japan2,218103244
Singapore554620106
Other3,60031958104
Natural gas (as LNG) bn m³
Middle EastAfricaIndonesiaMalaysia
China13.04.97.48.3
Japan14.62.03.014.8
South Korea18.71.43.76.7
Taiwan7.30.71.61.0
Other8.01.90.71.9
*includes condensates

South China Sea territorial claims

China's estimated seaborne oil trade

China-Myanmar crude infrastructure

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
04/04/25

WTI crude falls near 4-year low on trade war: Update

WTI crude falls near 4-year low on trade war: Update

Adds end of day changes to stock markets, WTI, Treasuries Calgary, 4 April (Argus) — The US light sweet crude benchmark WTI fell by more than 7pc after China retaliated against the US' latest tariff action, while a selloff in global equity markets deepened. May Nymex WTI fell by $4.96/bl to $61.99/bl, the lowest since 26 April 2021, and is down by $9.72/bl over the most recent two days. Turmoil also continued for a second day in equity markets with the S&P 500 down by 6pc, the Nasdaq down by 5.8pc and the Dow Jones Industrial Average down by 5.5pc from the day prior, which saw similiar losses, wiping out nearly a year of gains for the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq. Trillions of dollars in value were wiped out. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note fell to end the day just above 4pc, its lowest since October, as Treasury prices rallied as investors sought safe haven in the dollar-denominated notes. Treasury yields and prices move counter to each other. The equity selloff persisted on mounting fears of a recession after US president Donald Trump on 2 April imposed sweeping tariffs on dozens of global trading partners for imports into the US. China hit back on Friday with a 34pc tariff of its own against the US from 10 April, driving away any hope by investors for a rebound after a selloff the day before. WTI fell by as much as 9pc during Friday's session after China's retaliation, bottoming out at $60.45/bl. The gloomy economic outlook overshadowed a strong job report that showed the US added a more-than-expected 228,000 jobs in March, showing hiring was picking up last month just as the new US administration began mass federal firings and announced tariffs on trading partners. The IMF say tariffs represent a "significant risk" to the global outlook while US-based bank Goldman Sachs said Friday it has cut its oil demand growth estimate for this year to 600,000 b/d from 900,000 b/d, based on its economists' new view of economic growth. Adding price pressure this week has also been the unexpected plans by eight Opec+ members to unwind production cuts faster , upping output in May by 411,000 b/d. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Tariffs and their impact larger than expected: Powell


04/04/25
News
04/04/25

Tariffs and their impact larger than expected: Powell

New York, 4 April (Argus) — Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell said today tariff increases unveiled by US president Donald Trump will be "significantly larger" than expected, as will the expected economic fallout. "The same is likely to be true of the economic effects, which will include higher inflation and slower growth," Powell said today at the Society for Advancing Business Editing and Writing's annual conference in Arlington, Virginia. The central bank will continue to carefully monitor incoming data to assess the outlook and the balance of risks, he said. "We're well positioned to wait for greater clarity before considering any adjustments to our policy stance," Powell added. "It is too soon to say what will be the appropriate path for monetary policy." As of 1pm ET today, Fed funds futures markets are pricing in 29pc odds of a quarter point cut by the Federal Reserve at its next meeting in May and 99pc odds of at least a quarter point rate cut in June. Earlier in the day the June odds were at 100pc. The Fed chairman spoke after trillions of dollars in value were wiped off stock markets around the world and crude prices plummeted following Trump's rollout of across-the-board tariffs earlier in the week. Just before his appearance, Trump pressed Powell in a post on his social media platform to "STOP PLAYING POLITICS!" and cut interest rates without delay. A closely-watched government report showed the US added a greater-than-expected 228,000 jobs in March , showing hiring was picking up last month. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump talks up tariff deals as markets slide


04/04/25
News
04/04/25

Trump talks up tariff deals as markets slide

Washington, 4 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump held out prospects of a negotiated reduction in high tariffs targeting key US trading partners while insisting that import taxes are here to say. Trump via his social media platform said today he spoke with Vietnam Communist Party leader To Lam, who promised to cut their tariffs to zero on US products. Under the plan Trump unveiled on 2 April, US imports from Vietnam will be subject to a 46pc tariff. Trump late Thursday told reporters that a deal on tariffs is possible "if somebody said that we're going to give you something that's so phenomenal." He mentioned a possible deal with China over the sale of social platform TikTok, which is owned by Chinese company ByteDance. "We have a situation with Tiktok where China will probably say, we'll approve a deal, but will you do something on the tariff?", Trump said. The Trump administration is forcing ByteDance to sell TikTok to a US company, but Beijing must approve the sale. "The tariffs give us great power to negotiate," Trump said. But China's commerce ministry today unveiled a 34pc tariff on all imports from the US from 10 April, and vowed that no exemptions will be granted, unlike in its previous round of tit-for-tat tariffs on US commodities. Trump on 2 April announced a 10pc baseline tax on all foreign imports starting on 5 April, while many major US trading partners would be subject to an even higher tax beginning on 9 April. Imports from the EU would be subject to a 20pc tariff beginning on 9 April and imports from China subject to a 34pc tariff in addition to the previously imposed 20pc tariffs. "CHINA PLAYED IT WRONG, THEY PANICKED - THE ONE THING THEY CANNOT AFFORD TO DO!", Trump said on social media after the announcement from Beijing. Trump's executive order exempted energy commodities and many critical minerals from new tariffs, as well as trade already covered under the US Mexico Canada free trade agreement (USMCA). But oil and stock markets continued to slide today as economists and investors concluded that the US tariffs and potential foreign counter-measures would lead to a protracted trade war and reduce economic growth globally. The latest tariffs are likely to cut global growth rates by 0.5 percentage points and reduce US GDP growth by 1pc in 2025-26, analysts with investment bank Standard Chartered said in a note to clients today. Federal Reserve chairman Jay Powell, speaking at a conference in Arlington, Virginia, today, warned that the latest bout of tariffs will lead to "higher inflation and slower growth." IMF executive director Kristalina Georgieva issued a similar warning on Thursday evening. Trump retorted via his social media platform that "This would be a PERFECT time for Fed Chairman Jerome Powell to cut Interest Rates." What's next? Despite touting possible deals to avoid high tariffs, Trump also said today that investors planning to move manufacturing to the US should expect no changes in his tariff policies. Trump's cabinet also struggled to articulate what comes next, with commerce secretary Howard Lutnick saying that Trump would not lift the tariffs announced this week, while treasury secretary Scott Bessent said deals over tariff levels were possible. Secretary of state Marco Rubio, speaking to reporters on a trip to Brussels, Belgium, said that "it's not fair to say that the economies are crashing — markets are crashing because markets are based on the stock value of companies who today are embedded in modes of production that are bad for the US. "The markets will adjust business around the world, including in trade," Rubio said. "They just need to know what the rules are." By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

UK considers import tariffs on US oil products


04/04/25
News
04/04/25

UK considers import tariffs on US oil products

London, 4 April (Argus) — The UK government has included refined oil products from the US in a list of goods that could be subject to retaliatory tariffs. The government said it was considering "potential tariff measures on US goods, should this be deemed necessary" in response to a 10pc US import tariff on UK goods and services — excluding energy — due to take effect on 5 April. The consultation will last until 1 May. Light oils, gasoils, jet fuel, fuel oils, lubricants and bitumen all feature in the list of products possibly subject to retaliatory tariffs. The UK could be particularly exposed to any tariff impact on US middle distillate imports in the event of retaliation. The UK sourced over a quarter of its 14.37mn t of 10ppm diesel and gasoil from the US last year, according to Vortexa, while 3pc of its 10.15mn t of jet and kerosine imports were sourced from the US. It is not clear what tariff rate the UK is targeting in its potential retaliation. For other oil products, any potential import tariff impact would become more muted as US refined product imports become less significant. The UK received just 6pc of its 1.92mn t total fuel oil imports from the US last year, while the UK was the fourth largest gasoline supplier to the US and received none of the product from its trade partner. European refined product values have collapsed as a result of the escalating trade war which saw China retaliate today against the US' latest tariff action. Eurobob non-oxy gasoline barge prices dropped by 4pc to $700.75/t on 3 April at a time when trading activity typically picks up ahead of the US summer driving season. Indicated non-oxy barge values were set to drop further in the trading session today. The EU is similarly preparing countermeasures against US import tariffs, which Washington set at 20pc from 9 April in addition to existing rates. Ice gasoil futures had dropped by 10pc since President Trump announced the new tariff regime on 2 April to $615.75/t by the close today. Ice gasoil futures are used as the pricing basis against which diesel, gasoil and jet fuel grades are assessed in the European middle distillates markets. European refined products market participants have pointed to a darker global economic outlook triggered by the US import tariffs as the driving force behind the drop-off in European product values. By George Maher-Bonnett Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

WTI crude falls to 4-year low on escalating trade war


04/04/25
News
04/04/25

WTI crude falls to 4-year low on escalating trade war

Calgary, 4 April (Argus) — The US light sweet crude benchmark WTI fell by as much as 9pc this morning after China retaliated to the US' latest tariff action, while a selloff in global equity markets deepened. May Nymex WTI traded as low as $60.81/bl Friday morning, a more than $6/bl tumble from the settled price in the session before when it gave up $4.76/bl. Prompt month WTI has not been this low since 13 April 2021 when it settled at $60.18/bl. Prices across commodities and equities are down sharply after China on Friday said it will impose a 34pc tariff on all imports from the US from 10 April, a retaliation for new tariffs launched by US president Donald Trump on 2 April . China faces a 34pc import tariff from 9 April, on top of the 20pc tariffs Trump has imposed over the past two months. The prompt-month WTI contract has given up more than $10/bl, or 17pc, in the two days since Trump announced that dozens of countries would be subject to "reciprocal" tariffs, prompting serious concerns over lower global economic growth and a higher chance of a recession. The IMF say tariffs represent a "significant risk" to the global outlook while US-based bank Goldman Sachs said Friday it has cut its oil demand growth estimate for this year to 600,000 b/d from 900,000 b/d, based on its economists' new view of economic growth. Adding price pressure this week has also been the unexpected plans by eight Opec+ members to unwind production cuts faster , upping output in May by 411,000 b/d. Turmoil continued for the second-straight day in equity markets, with the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq all down between 3-5pc so far. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more