Oil firms struggle with 'carbon offset' messaging
Oil and gas firms' carbon offset claims are being met with scepticism in the absence of industry-wide and verified definitions and methodologies.
BP this month made what it calls a carbon offset LNG delivery in Asia-Pacific, saying it estimated "the greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions from wellhead to discharge terminal associated with the specific source and voyage for the LNG cargo, using its own quantification methodology". The credits for this "carbon offset LNG cargo" come from the firm's carbon trading portfolio.
BP is not the only company offering what are described as "carbon offset" and "carbon neutral" hydrocarbon cargoes. Oil and gas firms insist that gas and LNG in particular have an important transition role to play in the world's drive to reduce emissions. And "carbon offset" deliveries — even of crude — also seem to attract at least some new buyers. But climate activists and some organisations — including the IEA — have quite a few issues with carbon offset claims.
Key among these is the lack of transparency and standardisation on monitoring, reporting and verifying the GHG emissions associated with such cargoes, resulting in companies effectively judging themselves and making assumptions, without any third-party verification. There are similar problems with monitoring and comparing oil firms' energy transition targets, including those related to carbon intensity cuts, as companies use different criteria in their calculations.
Furthermore, carbon offset cargoes generally do not cover Scope 3 emissions — those from customer use of products, which are by far the largest part of the industry's carbon footprint. And things on the consumer side are similarly far from clear. The Netherlands' advertising regulator made a non-binding decision in late August that Shell's "Drive CO2 neutral" campaign — claiming that retail station customers can offset their carbon emissions by paying slightly more for fuel — is misleading. The regulator ruled that Shell cannot prove how much it is offsetting the emissions. The company says the extra payment goes towards offset solutions such as tree planting, and that the campaign is based on research and is "a genuine and important initiative" to allow consumers to offset CO2 from their fuel use.
Credit where credit's due
Carbon credits play an important role in many oil and gas firms' transition strategies, although to a different degree. BP, the only major to have pledged a sharp cut — 40pc — in hydrocarbons output this decade, says it "does not intend to rely on carbon credits" to meet its 2030 emission reduction targets. Others, such as Shell, are putting more emphasis on nature-based solutions to achieve climate goals, and need to convince investors and society that their approach does not lack credibility.
This year's extreme weather events do not help. Wildfires have swept through some forests that generate carbon credits for large firms in industries including oil and gas, reinforcing perceptions of a vicious cycle. Upstream independent Lundin Energy's recent claim that it sold a carbon neutral certified oil cargo was dismissed by environmental group Greenpeace as the oil sector sinking to "new depths in desperate attempts to greenwash its climate-wrecking industry".
Investor research group Transition Pathway Initiative is launching a new energy sector report next month, aiming to show investors whether a company's carbon performance aligns with a 1.5°C pathway. The associated benchmark will be built using the the IEA's Net Zero by 2050 emissions roadmap, which assumes no need for any new oil or gas fields beyond those already approved for development. Oil and gas firms may want to rethink their own energy transition messaging to show that their strategies are credible, rather than draw accusations of desperate greenwashing in an attempt to prolong the shelf life of hydrocarbons.
Related news posts
Libyan crude production slips below 600,000 b/d
Libyan crude production slips below 600,000 b/d
Dubai, 30 August (Argus) — Libya's crude output has fallen to below 600,000 b/d, less than half what the country was producing just a month ago, according to figures reported by state-owned oil company NOC. Production has plummeted in recent days after Libya's eastern-based administration announced a blockade on oil output and exports in response to moves by its rival, the Tripoli-based Presidential Council, to replace the central bank governor. Libya produced 591,024 bl on 28 August, NOC said, down from 783,422 bl on 27 August and 958,979 bl on 26 August, NOC said. Production is almost certain to have fallen further on 29-30 August. It represents a more than halving of output in the space of just a month. Production stood at 1.28mn bl on 20 July, NOC said, while Argus assessed the July average at 1.2mn b/d. Total losses over 26-28 August amounted to around 1.5mn bl, worth just over $120mn. NOC said. All of Libya's eastern oil terminals — Es Sider, Ras Lanuf, Zueitina, Marsa el Hariga and Marsa el Brega — received instructions to stop operations at 15:00 local time on 29 August, according to port agents in the country. Some tankers have managed to load crude since the blockade was announced at the start of the week. The New Amorgos and Ohio loaded at Zueitina and Es Sider, respectively, and have since sailed from the country. Five more tankers were scheduled to load crude in the country from today, according to Kpler tracking, four of them in the east. The clash between the rival east and west political factions in Libya had been brewing for over week before the blockade announcement. The eastern-based Libyan National Army (LNA) has imposed several politically motivated oil blockades in the past few years. The LNA ordered the shutdown of the El Sharara field earlier this month, resulting in the loss of around 250,000 b/d of output. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australia's Qantas records higher fuel costs in 2023-24
Australia's Qantas records higher fuel costs in 2023-24
Singapore, 30 August (Argus) — Australian airline Qantas Airways recorded a higher fuel bill in the 2023-24 fiscal year to 30 June, as more flights, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) expenses and carbon offset programmes weighed on costs. Qantas saw its fuel costs rise by 17pc from a year earlier to A$5.32bn ($3.62bn) in 2023-24, according to the company's full-year financial results released on 29 August. The airline group's passenger carrying capacity was up by 21pc on the previous year, with growth in domestic and international capaicty. This saw the group's overall fuel consumption grow to 29mn bl (79,000 b/d), or 18pc up on the previous year. Qantas expects fuel costs in the first half of 2024-25 to remain stable from a year earlier at about A$2.7bn, including hedging and gross carbon costs, with the group forecasting to consume 15.6mn bl of fuel, including SAF. Qantas forecasts domestic group capacity to rise to 104pc of pre-Covid 19 pandemic capacity in the first half of 2024-25. Its international capacity guidance, excluding Jetstar Asia, is expected to rise by about 16pc from the previous year to achieve 102pc of pre-Covid levels in the first half. The group's passenger carrying capacity, measured by available seat kilometres (ASKs), was up on a year earlier by 21pc to 141mn ASK by 2023-24, although this was still about 93pc of pre-Covid levels. Qantas has agreements to offtake SAF, renewing its agreement to buy SAF for flights out of London Heathrow and doubling the size of its corporate customer SAF programme in 2023-24. But the group saw its 2023-24 profit fall, with underlying profit before tax down by 16pc on the previous year to A$2.08bn. By Cara Wong Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
India lifts curbs on use of sugarcane juice for ethanol
India lifts curbs on use of sugarcane juice for ethanol
Mumbai, 30 August (Argus) — The Indian government is allowing sugar mills and distilleries to use sugarcane juice and sugar syrup to produce ethanol during the November 2024-October 2025 supply year. The government in December last year halted the use of sugarcane juice and sugar syrup for ethanol production in the 2023-24 supply year, as insufficient rainfall in key growing regions led to a surge in domestic sugar prices and a shortage of the sweetener. Sugar mills and distilleries can also produce ethanol from B-heavy and C-heavy molasses. The food ministry's order added that it will, in co-ordination with the oil ministry, periodically review the diversion of sugar to ethanol production in relation to the production of sugar in the country to ensure the availability of sugar for domestic consumption throughout the year. The government also allowed the Food Corporation of India to sell rice to distilleries for ethanol production during August-October but capped the limit at 2.3mn t of rice. India had suspended supplies of excess rice to distilleries for ethanol production in July 2023 because of food availability and concerns about rising prices. Distilleries will be allowed to load rice during August-October subject to allocation of ethanol to the distilleries by oil marketing companies, the government order said. Of the total ethanol used for blending in gasoline in India, around 61pc comes from B-heavy molasses, 20pc from sugar syrup, 11pc from surplus rice, 6pc from damaged food grains and maize and 2pc from C-heavy molasses. India has a set a goal to increase ethanol blending in gasoline to 20pc by 2025, as part of efforts to reduce its dependence on crude imports. Ethanol blending in gasoline was 13.3pc during November 2023-July 2024 and 15.8pc during July 2024, oil ministry data show. Oil marketing companies buy ethanol from ethanol producers like sugar mills and distilleries to blend with gasoline. By Roshni Devi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Brazil's Bndes backs reforestation firm
Brazil's Bndes backs reforestation firm
Sao Paulo, 29 August (Argus) — Brazil's Bndes development bank approved R160mn ($28.7mn) in financing for reforestation company Mombak, which will use the funding for projects in Para state that will generate carbon offsets to be sold in the international market. The company has planted over 3mn native tree species in Para as part of its broader efforts to recover degraded areas in the Amazon basin where deforestation levels are highest. Mombak will receive R80mn from the Bndes' Climate fund and another R80mn from the banks' Finem line of credit. This is not Mobak's first project to sell carbon offsets. The company has a deal with Microsoft for 1.5mn offsets and with automobile racing firm McLaren. The funding is part of a partnership between Bndes and the environment ministry to reduce deforestation in an area known as the "deforestation arch" in the Amazon, with the goal of recovering 6mn hectares (ha) of degraded area in this region by 2030 and 18mn ha by 2050. This environmentally vulnerable region has received R1bn in financing since it was officially targeted at the Cop 28 UN climate talks. Mombak was founded in 2021 by former executives from Brazilian tech companies 99 and Nubank. The company has raised roughly R1bn in capital to invest in reforestation projects. It also received backing from the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Bain Capital, French insurance company AXA and the Rockefeller Foundation. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
![Generic Hero Banner](/_next/image?url=%2F-%2Fmedia%2Fproject%2Fargusmedia%2Fmainsite%2Fimages%2F14-generic-hero-banners%2Fherobanner_1600x530_generic-c.jpg%3Fh%3D530%26iar%3D0%26w%3D1600%26rev%3D8ec86dce0f724687bd325a9a917cffae%26hash%3D9FD39B08C9D84A160C91A3649C40A186&w=3840&q=75)
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more