Latest market news

Energy crisis casts shadow over Cop 27 climate goals

  • Market: Coal, Crude oil, Emissions, Hydrogen, Natural gas, Oil products
  • 07/11/22

World leaders are heading into the Cop 27 UN climate summit in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, today having struggled to turn commitments made at Cop 26 last year into actions, and with energy security concerns heightened by Russia's war in Ukraine at risk of clouding climate ambitions during the conference.

Egypt, which has taken over the Cop presidency from the UK, has dubbed the conference "the implementation Cop", following last year's flurry of pledges. But there are fears that some countries could backslide on commitments, using the energy crisis as a pretext for prioritising energy security — and fossil fuels — over net-zero goals. One of the main commitments made in the Glasgow climate pact agreed last year was to revisit and strengthen 2030 emission pledges — so-called nationally determined contributions (NDCs) — by the end of this year to align them with the 2015 Paris agreement goal of limiting global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, and ideally to 1.5°C.

But only around 25 countries of the nearly 200 parties to the Cop process have done so before Cop 27. More countries will head to Cop 27 with new targets — Chile, Vietnam, Turkey and Mexico have said that they would, and Brazil's new government will probably confirm its intention to strengthen goals — but it will remain far from enough. Under current pledges, the world is on course to reach 2.5°C of warming by the end of the century, according to the UN.

Delivering on finance is Cop 27's priority. Egypt wants to see progress on a headline finance target of $100bn/yr, a promise that developed countries were supposed to meet by 2020 to help developing nations hit their climate goals. The OECD estimates that the goal could be reached in 2023, but delivering on the target would make for a relatively small win in Sharm el-Sheikh, as Cop parties and observers are increasingly questioning the adequacy of the figure.

"Even if we multiplied the $100bn by 10, it would not even cover half of the funding gaps for developing economies to address climate change," UN climate change high-level champion for Egypt Mahmoud Mohieldin said, stressing that the topic of finance should not be limited to this amount. Cop 27 president-designate Sameh Shoukry said the aim of the summit is to "restore the grand bargain at the centre of the Paris agreement and our collective multilateral process", whereby developing countries agree to raise their ambitions in return for financial support.

Show me the money

Beyond the headline figure, developing countries want meaningful progress on adaptation and loss and damage, with the Group of 77 plus China — an inter-governmental organisation of developing nations comprising 134 members — pushing for funding arrangements on the latter to be put on the Cop 27 agenda. Adaptation refers to adjustments in ecological, social or economic systems, in response to climate change impact. Loss and damage refers to unavoidable, permanent and destructive climate change often affecting the lowest-emitting countries.

For the first time since the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) entered into force in 1994, loss and damage funding was yesterday put on the Cop agenda, following lengthy negotiations. Observers had feared that failing to agree on this could have derailed the summit from the start. But the issue needs to be properly addressed, after no new funding for loss and damage was agreed at Cop 26, and could still weigh on the outcome of negotiations.

Observers hope that the EU and the US will push the issue forward this year. European Commission executive vice-president Frans Timmermans talked, without mentioning concrete sums, of the bloc being ambitious and "building bridges" with developing countries, while US climate envoy John Kerry said Washington is committed to finding a path forward to address loss and damage.

Another cause of concern for the Egyptian Cop presidency is that, as well as Russia's invasion of Ukraine, strained relations between the US and China could be used as an excuse for backsliding on climate commitments. China, the world's largest emitter, last year secured with India a last-minute watering down of the language in Cop 26's text on coal. Although the US criticised the Chinese leadership's absence from last year's Cop, the two countries subsequently signed a climate pledge and agreed to work on methane emissions. But China has since halted talks with the US in response to US House speaker Nancy Pelosi's trip to Taiwan.

Kerry [said that the decision to restart discussions ultimately lies with Chinese president Xi Jinping]( https://direct.argusmedia.com/newsandanalysis/article/). "Until then we are in limbo." Observers expect further development from the two countries on methane, and hope that China will release a methane action plan during the conference.

Developed nations face a crisis of climate credibility at the summit, as they scramble to tame higher energy prices. Increased coal burning and the drive to secure fossil energy supplies in the EU in response to a gas shortfall resulting from Russia's war in Ukraine could cloud the bloc's position in negotiations, although Timmermans stressed this is only a temporary response. "Even if we use a bit more coal today, we'll be going much faster in our energy transition," he said.

Phase down, but not out

G7 countries in May committed to reaching "predominantly decarbonised electricity sectors" by 2035, taking further steps towards a phase-out of unabated coal-fired power generation. But discussions on coal-fired power generation could take an awkward turn in the near-term energy crisis context. Energy security issues are expected to push overall coal demand higher in the next few years.

Global coal consumption — comprising thermal and metallurgical usage —rebounded by 5.8pc to 7.9bn t in 2021, according to the Paris-based IEA, while the consumer country organisation expects 2022 consumption to increase to 8bn t, which would match a 2013 record high. China accounts for half of the world's production and consumption.

Some ground could be gained if discussions on potential Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs) with Vietnam, Indonesia and India progress during Cop 27. India's coal demand is projected to grow to 1.3bn-1.5bn t/yr by 2030 — 63pc higher than current levels — coal minister Pralhad Joshi said in March. The partnerships would be similar to the $8.5bn finance deal signed between South Africa and the US, UK, France, Germany and the EU at Cop 26 to support Africa's second-largest economy in phasing out coal. In the meantime, Germany's coal imports from South Africa have increased eightfold.

European countries have also pursued new gas projects in Africa to cut their dependence on Russian energy. Coal, and fossil fuels in general, were directly targeted for the first time in a Cop text last year. But the global energy crisis has made the issue of gas as a transition fuel a flashpoint, with some African countries likely to ask for financial support to develop their resources and economies, as Nigeria did last year at Cop 26. Uganda's oil minister last week defended the country's planned oil projects, saying that developed nations cannot tell the developing world "to remain in darkness".

It will be the first Cop to take place on the African continent since Marrakesh, Morocco, in 2016, and Egypt will be striving to lead by example, but energy security issues, as well as a currency crisis, have weighed on the country's decarbonisation plans. Kerry said last week that Egypt could pledge to reduce its gas use during the summit and build 10GW of new renewable energy capacity. Egyptian oil minister Tarek el-Molla said last month that natural gas will continue to play a key role in the future energy mix, calling it "the cleanest hydrocarbon fuel" at a meeting of the Gas Exporting Countries Forum.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
22/11/24

Cop: Brazil eyes $300bn/yr for climate finance goal

Cop: Brazil eyes $300bn/yr for climate finance goal

Baku, 22 November (Argus) — Brazil has set out a suggestion of "at least" $300bn/yr in climate finance to be provided by developed countries to developing nations. Brazilian representatives set out their proposal today, in response to a draft text on a new climate finance goal. Brazil's proposal of $300bn/yr in climate finance by 2030 and $390bn/yr by 2035 are in line with the recommendations of a UN-mandated expert group. Negotiations at Cop are continuing late into the evening of the official last day of the conference, with no final texts in sight. Discussions centre around the new collective quantified goal (NCQG) — the climate financing that will be made available to developing countries in the coming years to help them reduce emissions and adapt to the effects of climate change. The presidency draft text released this morning put the figure at $250bn/yr by 2035, with a call for "all actors" to work towards a stretch goal of $1.3tn/yr. Representatives of developing countries have reacted angrily to the figure put forward in the text, saying it is far too low. Brazil's proposal appears to call for all of the $300bn-$390bn to be made up of direct public financing, which could then mobilise further funding to reach the $1.3tn/yr. It was inspired by the findings of a UN report, Brazil said. The UN-backed independent high-level group on climate finance today said that the $250bn/yr figure was "too low," and recommended the higher $300bn-390bn/yr goal. Brazil's ask would be a significant step up in the required public financing. The $250bn/yr target includes direct public financing and mobilised private financing, and potentially includes contributions from both developed and developing countries. Wealthier developing countries have been hesitant to see their climate financing fall in this category, which they say should be made up exclusively of developed country money, in line with the Paris Agreement. But $300bn/yr would represent an increase in ambition, Brazil said, while the $250bn/yr called for in the draft text would be very similar to the $100bn/yr goal set in 2009, after taking into account inflation. Delegates at Cop look set to continue discussions into the night. A plenary session planned for late in the evening, which would have allowed parties to express their positions in public, has been cancelled, suggesting groups still have differences to hammer out. By Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Cop: Developing nations reject first finance offer


22/11/24
News
22/11/24

Cop: Developing nations reject first finance offer

Baku, 22 November (Argus) — Developing countries at the UN Cop 29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan have rejected the first climate finance amount put forward by developed nations, and are mulling counter-offers. A revised draft text for a new climate finance goal was released earlier today. Parties are negotiating the next iteration of the $100bn/yr that developed countries agreed to deliver to developing nations over 2020-25 — known as the new collective quantified goal (NCQG). The new text stated that developed nations should contribute $250bn/yr by 2035 in climate finance for developing countries. This is up from the previous $100bn/yr that developed countries agreed to deliver over 2020-25, but still a fraction of the 1.3 trillion/yr that developing countries have been calling for. "The [$250bn/yr] offered by developed countries is a spit on the face of vulnerable nations like mine," said Panama's representative Juan Carlos Monterrey Gomez. "They offer crumbs while we bear the dead," he said, adding that the amount offered is "outrageous, evil and remorseless." There is still "a lot to fight for," said a delegate from Honduras, as others suggested that major edits to the text are likely. The negotiating block the Alliance of Small Island States (Aosis) pointed out that the text ignores minimum allocation floors for small island developing states (Sids) and least developed countries (LDCs) of at least $39bn/yr and $220bn/yr, as proposed at the start of the summit. The LDCs also complained that "rich" members of the group of 77 (G77) — a UN coalition of developing nations —insisted on no carve-outs for the poorer and most vulnerable countries, according to a Somalian delegate. The proposed $250bn/yr will severely stagnate climate action efforts and does not raise the bar from the previous ineffective $100bn/yr goal, the Aosis group said. "We cannot be expected to agree to a text which shows such contempt for our vulnerable people." Counter-offer A UN-mandated finance expert group indicated that the figure put forward by developing countries "is too low" and not consistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement. The group's analysis shows that the new finance goal for developing countries, based on the components that it covers, should commit developed countries to provide at least $300bn/yr by 2030, and $390bn/yr by 2035. "We believe that these targets are feasible," the group said. Brazil indicated that the country is now pushing for these targets. The final amount for the new finance goal could potentially be around $300bn-350bn/yr, a Somalian delegate told Argus. Developed nations, in contrast, offered more muted responses. "It has been a significant lift over the past decade to meet the prior goal [of $100bn/yr]," said a senior US official, and the new goal will require even more ambition and "extraordinary reach." A delegate from Norway told Argus that the text is "something to work on" and that they were "happier than yesterday." "We should leave Baku with a goal that at least gets to $300bn/yr by 2035," said climate think-tank WRI's finance programme director Melanie Robinson. "This is achievable with projected finance, further reforms and shareholder support at multilateral banks, and some growth in bilateral funding," she said. By Prethika Nair and Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Blenders credit extension stalled in US Senate


22/11/24
News
22/11/24

Blenders credit extension stalled in US Senate

New York, 22 November (Argus) — A push for US lawmakers to extend various biofuel incentives before the end of the year has met resistance in the Senate. A growing coalition of biofuel and soybean groups has endorsed extending for one year a $1/USG federal tax credit for blenders of biomass-based diesel, which would otherwise expire after December and be replaced by the Inflation Reduction Act's carbon-intensity-based "45Z" credit. But lawmakers have various other priorities in the final weeks of this legislative session, and a staffer with the Democratic-controlled US Senate Finance Committee confirmed that prospects for a deal to extend biofuel tax credits are slim. "Republicans have showed very little interest in working with Democrats on much of anything related to tax," said Ryan Carey, chief communications advisor and deputy policy director at the Committee on Finance. "Their focus is primarily on the next Congress, when they're going to attempt to pass an extension of the first Trump tax law on a partisan basis." Another Senate office acknowledged on background that it is "unlikely" Congress will come to any major tax deal before the end of the year. Congress has other priorities for its brief lame duck session before president-elect Donald Trump begins his second term, including government funding, the federal debt limit, and a new farm bill. Tax policy could still fit into an end-of-year package, with some less controversial tax provisions and a bipartisan business tax proposal backed by Senate Finance Committee chair Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) still under discussion. But prolonging the biodiesel blenders credit — plus other biofuel credits benefiting sustainable aviation fuel and cellulosic fuels that some groups have also pushed to extend — appears to be a tougher lift. With Trump in the White House and Republicans set to control both chambers of Congress, Republicans are now preparing major tax policy legislation next year to prolong tax cuts passed during Trump's first term that are set to expire at the end of 2025. Lawmakers are likely to look at repealing some Inflation Reduction Act clean energy subsidies to help offset the cost of that proposal. Republicans on the House tax-writing committee this week requested public input on the 45Z credit specifically, a signal that they are at least open to modifications — and are already looking to tax policy next year. Biofuel subsidies are seen by analysts and lobbyists as less likely targets for repeal than other Inflation Reduction Act credits, given support for the industry among farm state lawmakers. But the request-for-information this week suggested that Republicans are wary of elements of the current 45Z credit and could support changes that benefit agribusiness. Even biofuel groups generally supportive of the 45Z credit's structure have been frustrated by President Joe Biden's administration, which has yet to issue guidance clarifying how it will calculate the carbon intensities of different fuels and feedstocks. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Cop: Decision on 2026 host unlikely in Baku


22/11/24
News
22/11/24

Cop: Decision on 2026 host unlikely in Baku

Washington, 22 November (Argus) — A decision on which country will host the UN Cop 31 climate talks in 2026 may not come until next year, as Australia and Turkey vie to be the next host. Draft decision text released on Friday at Cop 29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, would punt the decision and call on western European and other States to accelerate their consultations" and be prepared to present an offer to host in June 2025. Australia formally bid in 2022 to host Cop 31 and had little competition other than Turkey, which has refused to back down. Pushing the decision to next year would shorten the amount of time the eventual host has to prepare. But Azerbaijan won its hosting duties [only last year] at Cop 28 in Dubai. Brazil, the host of Cop 30, had its bid accepted in May 2023 . Under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Turkey is part of a grouping of western European countries, while Australia is in a group of "other states" that also includes Canada, Iceland, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and the US. The Australian delegation in Baku did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The draft text said that Cop 32 will be held in an African country from 8-19 November 2027. By Michael Ball Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Cop: Drafts point to trade-off on finance, fossil fuels


22/11/24
News
22/11/24

Cop: Drafts point to trade-off on finance, fossil fuels

Baku, 22 November (Argus) — The new draft on the climate finance goal from the UN Cop 29 climate summit presidency has developed nations contributing $250bn/yr by 2035, while language on fossil fuels has been dropped, indicating work towards a compromise on these two central issues. There is no mention of fossil fuels in either the new draft text on the global stocktake — which follows up the outcome of Cop 28 last year, including "transitioning away" from fossil fuels — or in the new draft for the climate finance goal. Developed countries wanted a reference to moving away from fossil fuels included, indicating that not having one would be a red line. The new draft text on the climate finance goal would mark a substantial compromise for developing countries, with non-profit WRI noting that this is "the bridging text". Parties are negotiating the next iteration of the $100bn/yr that developed countries agreed to deliver to developing nations over 2020-25 — known as the new collective quantified goal (NCQG). The new draft sets out a figure of $250bn/yr by 2035, "from a wide variety of sources, public and private, bilateral and multilateral, including alternative sources". It also notes that developed countries will "take the lead". It sets out that the finance could come from multilateral development banks (MDBs) too. "It has been a significant lift over the past decade to meet the prior, smaller goal... $250bn will require even more ambition and extraordinary reach," a US official said. "This goal will need to be supported by ambitious bilateral action, MDB contributions and efforts to better mobilise private finance, among other critical factors," the official added. India had indicated earlier this week that the country was seeking around $600bn/yr for a public finance layer from developed countries. Developing countries had been asking for $1.3 trillion/yr in climate finance from developed countries, a sum which the new text instead calls for "all actors" to work toward. The draft text acknowledges the need to "enable the scaling up of financing… from all public and private sources" to that figure. On the contributor base — which developed countries have long pushed to expand — the text indicates that climate finance contributions from developing countries could supplement the finance goal. It is unclear how this language will land with developing nations. China yesterday reiterated that "the voluntary support" of the global south is not part of the goal. The global stocktake draft largely focuses on the initiatives set out by the Cop 29 presidency, on enhancing power grids and energy storage, though it does stress the "urgent need for accelerated implementation of domestic mitigation measures". It dropped a previous option, opposed by Saudi Arabia, that mentioned actions aimed at "transitioning away from fossil fuels". Mitigation, or cutting emissions, and climate finance have been the overriding issues at Cop 29. Developing countries have long said they cannot decarbonise or implement an energy transition without adequate finance. Developed countries are calling for substantially stronger global action on emissions reduction. By Georgia Gratton and Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more